Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 5609. (Read 26606831 times)

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Bring back Primecoin.

Primecoin, the coin that did something. I miss it too.

Oh shit. This is my 10000th 9999th post.

I was planning to unveil some master conspiracy involving treachery and high treason in Bitcoin for my 10000th post, but nah. After all, my 5000th post was the formal Scam Accusation against BSV. Alas, I'm busy AF in the real world, trying not to get sucked into entropy's hyperspeed.

Glad things are on schedule for WO domination of the world. Here's to all the dildo lovers, big and small.

copper member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2890

Well it’s Elon, Easa or Russia...
Russia is kind of a bad political idea....

And why are we going back to the moon... we needs to go to Mars  Cool
the reasons for going to the moon are more than just stepping stone to mars, first there maybe some minerals there that are economic to mine, but that's still speculative, to be proven.

most importantly though China has made moves that looks like it is intending to take the "commanding heights" militarily on the moon, this is no shit serious.

we may see the moon, or lunar orbits, cis lunar orbits, earth-moon L1 Lagrange point or earth orbits become the next battlefield.

1. The moon isn’t a stepping stone to Mars. Going direct to Mars saves time money and resources.
2. The moon is geologically dead and mostly made of the same stuff as earth. If it was pure diamond or gold then I’d understand. I believe He3 to be the most interesting...

....

3. Yup it’s showing their big dick again by putting military presence on the moon 🌚

Well gravity says you are so very wrong.
Along with atmosphere or lack of it.

We could shuttle stuff to the moon

big a bigger boat with more fuel as gravity would allow for easier take off. Also moon would be used as a spinning sling shot to boost that rocket ship.

Finally the lack of or very thin atmosphere would along for less friction on take offs and landing.

So If you really want us to go to mars a large basecamp on the moon makes sense.

As for military on the moon the military has always sucked and will always suck.  But Leaders love the war games.

Physics says you are wrong... And many experts too...

Building in zero gravity is even easier, and you can build bigger. Why take off twice? Once from earth and once from the moon. Added complexity and risk isn't worth it.

Shuttling stuff into space costs $10000/kg from earth, so if you want to go to the moon (or mars) then you need to make everything there and only pack your necessities.
Having to supply a base camp on the moon is stupendously expensive.

On Mars you can literally make rocket fuel from the atmosphere. The moon you can't.
Mars has everything you need is you can get to it.

The earth has rotation and you don't see us slingshotting into space. It only saves some fuel if you take off from the equator. So that argument is moot.

If you thrust away from earth you might aswell thrust into the Mars gravity field instead of the moons gravity field.


Money says you are wrong... and investors too...

1. One purpose of a Moon settlement will be tourism
2. Before stepping into Mars permanently may be a week on the moon will be a better option.
3. Private companies are ready to provide shuttle services, they just waiting for a “base camp”

 

legendary
Activity: 3304
Merit: 8633
icarus-cards.eu
Time for some FOMO to kick in?



With these images, are you trying to suggest that BTC is grandpa coin?   Your little diggs on bitcoin and your ongoing disgruntledness remains somewhat subliminal, no?

We have had 48k micros, 56k modems and you didn't get that these are 64k micros? Cheesy

and we also had that at the time ... for the younger ones among us, this is a 5 1/4 inch disk Grin
would actually make a very good coldwallet, wouldn't it?

legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1265

Well it’s Elon, Easa or Russia...
Russia is kind of a bad political idea....

And why are we going back to the moon... we needs to go to Mars  Cool
the reasons for going to the moon are more than just stepping stone to mars, first there maybe some minerals there that are economic to mine, but that's still speculative, to be proven.

most importantly though China has made moves that looks like it is intending to take the "commanding heights" militarily on the moon, this is no shit serious.

we may see the moon, or lunar orbits, cis lunar orbits, earth-moon L1 Lagrange point or earth orbits become the next battlefield.

1. The moon isn’t a stepping stone to Mars. Going direct to Mars saves time money and resources.
2. The moon is geologically dead and mostly made of the same stuff as earth. If it was pure diamond or gold then I’d understand. I believe He3 to be the most interesting...

....

3. Yup it’s showing their big dick again by putting military presence on the moon 🌚

Well gravity says you are so very wrong.
Along with atmosphere or lack of it.

We could shuttle stuff to the moon

big a bigger boat with more fuel as gravity would allow for easier take off. Also moon would be used as a spinning sling shot to boost that rocket ship.

Finally the lack of or very thin atmosphere would along for less friction on take offs and landing.

So If you really want us to go to mars a large basecamp on the moon makes sense.

As for military on the moon the military has always sucked and will always suck.  But Leaders love the war games.

Physics says you are wrong... And many experts too...

Building in zero gravity is even easier, and you can build bigger. Why take off twice? Once from earth and once from the moon. Added complexity and risk isn't worth it.

Shuttling stuff into space costs $10000/kg from earth, so if you want to go to the moon (or mars) then you need to make everything there and only pack your necessities.
Having to supply a base camp on the moon is stupendously expensive.

On Mars you can literally make rocket fuel from the atmosphere. The moon you can't.
Mars has everything you need is you can get to it.

The earth has rotation and you don't see us slingshotting into space. It only saves some fuel if you take off from the equator. So that argument is moot.

If you thrust away from earth you might aswell thrust into the Mars gravity field instead of the moons gravity field.

sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 292
I don't know where I'm going, but I'm going.
Good morning WO bros, have an awesome Saturday!
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2267
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
So my friend said I should sell all my Bitcoins and buy dogs...

hero member
Activity: 605
Merit: 634
Bring back Primecoin.
copper member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2890
W   T   F  ?
Jeeezusmuchwow!  Its up 517% 410% (lol) in past week... that's insane ridiculousness.
If bitcoin ever pumped 410% in one week I would dump it instantly because I'd know it's just another shitcoin.

Its up 517% 410%  324% (2 x lol) in past week...
legendary
Activity: 4200
Merit: 4887
You're never too old to think young.
Obviously the amazing rise of the value of serious altcoins is the result of institutional recognition that Bitcoin is outdated and has been superceded by more accessible coins like Doge.

Bitcoin is simply too expensive, so institutional investors are clearly following the lead of the savvy traders on Wall Street Bets, Twitter, Youtube, Reddit, etc., and putting their money into less expensive coins.

Bitcoin is old. Time to get rid of it.
legendary
Activity: 1235
Merit: 1202
W   T   F  ?
Jeeezusmuchwow!  Its up 517% in past week... that's insane ridiculousness.
If bitcoin ever pumped 517% in one week I would dump it instantly because I'd know it's just another shitcoin.

Pump and dump. A lot of people will make good money, even more will be left holding their bags
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
W   T   F  ?
Jeeezusmuchwow!  Its up 517% 410% (lol) in past week... that's insane ridiculousness.
If bitcoin ever pumped 410% in one week I would dump it instantly because I'd know it's just another shitcoin.

legendary
Activity: 2833
Merit: 1851
In order to dump coins one must have coins

...

Umm well yeah, if dodge continuously raises in value for over 12yrs vs BTC then i might concede that Dodge is eating BTC.
legendary
Activity: 4326
Merit: 8950
'The right to privacy matters'
First person to respond to this gets to choose the next poll  Smiley
Heyyyyy

Go ahead... we are waiting...

All this power and I don't know what to do with it... hmm... Let's try this...

How long until 70k

1 week
1 month
1 year
or the top is in math and science confirms it



1 Week
legendary
Activity: 1235
Merit: 1202
First person to respond to this gets to choose the next poll  Smiley
Heyyyyy

Go ahead... we are waiting...

All this power and I don't know what to do with it... hmm... Let's try this...

How long until 70k

1 week
1 month
1 year
or the top is in math and science confirms it
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist




Apparently, this Peter Schiff bitcoin hater character is trying to save face. But he's just digging his hole
deeper (the one he's been digging for, oh idk... past 5 years or so?) and it's not gonna end well.
Dude I get it, you don't like bitcoin. So just keep your pseudo "gold guru" yapping mouth shut about it.
That way there, you wont look like a total moron when it hits 100k.
Because you don't know diddly squat about it. You don't even know how to set up and safeguard a bitcoin wallet ffs...


off topic  hot off press

https://soundcloud.com/sirazimuth/i-was-thinking6
copper member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2890
First person to respond to this gets to choose the next poll  Smiley
Heyyyyy

Go ahead... we are waiting...
copper member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2890


Bitcoin doesn’t care what you write about it. Bitcoin is unstoppable,” Gladstein.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2617
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1767
Cлaвa Укpaїнi!
Seems like $60k is acting support, $70k next?

According to my calculations we are going to skip both $70k and $80k like nothing as soon as we cross $69,420.. End station would be around $94,300 for a small correction to $87,500 and that'll be the lowest we go until 2022.

I remain slightly skeptical.
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
a few pseudo-intellectual snarky replies because hey, its Friday night and I've had a couple.... love you bros  (nohomo)

....

Oh it's proudhon, he's been doing this a long long time..

Ya think?


ftfy

snip.. the usual gembitz weeeee  spam

scrolled by  (I dont use the ignore button )...

snip ...words

tldr...what else is new?

....
awesome (laser eyes) post, as per usual.

.....

The infamous "alt season". Bitcoin's drop in Market Capitalization happened in 2017 too: people jump into alts hoping to get more Bitcoins. And when they start selling, Bitcoin goes up in market share as well as in fiat value. I expect the same again: Bitcoin remains quite stable in value while alts are growing, and in a few months Bitcoin will absorb all that value.

/so far my wishes and expectations Cheesy

nailed it

First person to respond to this gets to choose the next poll  Smiley

Howdy stranger. Rumor has it, you are the mod of this historic mega thread, amirite?

.....

Dude!... my favorite WOber (nohomo)

....

I promise not bug you about that equation anymore.

....

yo fellow senior citizen miner bro... ^5.

GO BITCOIN


Jump to: