Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 5686. (Read 26609245 times)

legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
A decent compromise:  Use a well reviewed and vetted hardware wallet to do the above.

I'd add to that any software / hardware that is supported with wallets such as Electrum or Bitcoin Core / Bitcoin for Android. My hardware wallet equivalent is an airgapped machine, but then I think I know what I'm doing. (I could be mistaken and not actually know everything that's going on, but that would seem unlikely.)

I would include that in the list of ways to safely produce the private key.  But as you say it requires a little "know what you are doing", and just being able to get TAILS up on an air-gapped machine might be just enough to fortify the naïve user's bias that they know what they are doing when they do not.

It ends up being complicated.  How do we define "air gapped"? for example.  Turning the WIFI off on a laptop running ANY persistent OS (INCLUDING Tails under certain circumstances) would not meet my personal requirements.  People will print their seed words on printers that cache prints.


There are even simple pitfalls people can make that are obvious seeming to us, but not maybe all folks.  For example going to all the trouble to produce the private key safely and then typing the seed words into a wallet on a HOT machine.

Or something simple like people do not use  a BIP39 password(phrase).  Or they use one that can be brute forced.  Or one that is on a list already.

Bitcoin security is NOT for the lazy.  For sure.

And then there are the nuances.  What risks do you take by subjecting even your XPUBs to exposure?  Sure people will not be able to spend, but now we are delving into the privacy issue.

Shit... my BSOCD (Bitcoin Security Obsessive Compulsive Disorder) is kicking in hard. 
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1540

What are they a welfare state for India?

Quote
As a gift from India, Bhutan received in January 150,000 doses of Covishield vaccines manufactured by the Serum Institute in India – followed by a second shipment of 400,000 vaccines in March. India has also supplied Bhutan with medicines and medical supplies, including paracetamol, PPEs, N95 masks, test kits, and x-ray machines.
Nope, they also supplied 8-10 million doses and other medical necessities as a gift to all neighboring countries except Pakistan (They are about to receive doses through WHO initiative Covax). Although India does control pretty much everything for Bhutan (Trade, Security, Foreign policy)
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 292
I don't know where I'm going, but I'm going.
I am not anti-trusted layers... but I will not be parking any significant value on any of them, that's for sure.

Yes that’s always true “Not your keys, Not your coins”

One question how much can we trust these third party wallets then? Specially these wallets on our mobile apps. Although they give us access to the private keys but still can we trust them? I have been using Jaxx. But often I will open my wallet to confirm my coins are still there or some developer of Jaxx have already transferred my funds to some cold wallet :p

My coins are in cold storage only, just a small amount to fck around with shitcoins is on exchanges.

Delta gives me enough overview of everything, no need to access my coins via phone.

If we made a list of the X most important posts on this behemouth thread, I would vote this to rank highly... or one like it.  It cant be overstated, and I guarantee there are people here reading this that don't get why.  (Probably not most of the regulars... but maybe even some of us!)

Thank you, you just made me blush again like JJG before.

#nohomo
copper member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2890

100% = amount you HAVE to trust a third party wallet that holds your keys.
100% = amount you have to trust closed source wallet software even if you can access your keys
100% = amount you have to trust open source software for which you have not (or cannot) personally reviewed the code
100% = amount you have to trust open source software for which you have reviewed the code but not compiled the binaries
100% = amount you have to trust the above when you HAVE compiled the reviewed code, but don't really know what you are doing, but think you do.

That last one is a bitch.

It seems extreme, but in the end you can only trust a cold wallet for which you generated the keys in a *safe manner*, which is too long a process to detail here.  Then you can send your money to a hot wallet using procedures that are again too long to detail here, for spending.

This is most CERTAINLY one of Bitcoins biggest pain points.  Maybe tied with privacy.

A decent compromise:  Use a well reviewed and vetted hardware wallet to do the above.

A somber prediction:  "Bitcoin banks" and all the trust and regulatory risks that come with them are an INEVITIBILITY in the foreseeable future for almost all normal users.

Thank you so much for such a detailed reply, in short there’s no guarantee.. that your BTC are safe in such wallets.

So based on that can I say Bitcoin is not for lazy people? Sad

Well I’m somewhat technical guy but I have never compiled a source code of any wallet because still there’s no guarantee that the published source code and the binaries running on your mobile phone are same. Unless you can run/install your compiles binaries on your device itself.

This is true specially in case of iOS, its almost impossible to do so without high level expertise.

In short I would conclude never trust third party wallet.

Solution (for a lazy person like me of course)
- Distribute your coins in multiple storages/wallets
- Most of your bitcoins should always be in cold wallet
- Keep a small amount which you want to use or cash out in mobile wallets


legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4331

Oh, gawd, this dude has no clue, apparently.
This kind of attitude needs to be fought tooth and nail or bitcoin fungibility would be in question.

I've got some Caucasian-mined btc for a low low premium of 50%. I will be entertaining the offers shortly....

legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
A decent compromise:  Use a well reviewed and vetted hardware wallet to do the above.

I'd add to that any software / hardware that is supported with wallets such as Electrum or Bitcoin Core / Bitcoin for Android. My hardware wallet equivalent is an airgapped machine, but then I think I know what I'm doing. (I could be mistaken and not actually know everything that's going on, but that would seem unlikely.)
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
I am not anti-trusted layers... but I will not be parking any significant value on any of them, that's for sure.

Yes that’s always true “Not your keys, Not your coins”

One question how much can we trust these third party wallets then? Specially these wallets on our mobile apps. Although they give us access to the private keys but still can we trust them? I have been using Jaxx. But often I will open my wallet to confirm my coins are still there or some developer of Jaxx have already transferred my funds to some cold wallet :p

My coins are in cold storage only, just a small amount to fck around with shitcoins is on exchanges.

Delta gives me enough overview of everything, no need to access my coins via phone.

If we made a list of the X most important posts on this behemouth thread, I would vote this to rank highly... or one like it.  It cant be overstated, and I guarantee there are people here reading this that don't get why.  (Probably not most of the regulars... but maybe even some of us!)
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
I am not anti-trusted layers... but I will not be parking any significant value on any of them, that's for sure.

Yes that’s always true “Not your keys, Not your coins”

One question how much can we trust these third party wallets then? Specially these wallets on our mobile apps. Although they give us access to the private keys but still can we trust them? I have been using Jaxx. But often I will open my wallet to confirm my coins are still there or some developer of Jaxx have already transferred my funds to some cold wallet :p

100% = amount you HAVE to trust a third party wallet that holds your keys.
100% = amount you have to trust closed source wallet software even if you can access your keys
100% = amount you have to trust open source software for which you have not (or cannot) personally reviewed the code
100% = amount you have to trust open source software for which you have reviewed the code but not compiled the binaries
100% = amount you have to trust the above when you HAVE compiled the reviewed code, but don't really know what you are doing, but think you do.

That last one is a bitch.

It seems extreme, but in the end you can only trust a cold wallet for which you generated the keys in a *safe manner*, which is too long a process to detail here.  Then you can send your money to a hot wallet using procedures that are again too long to detail here, for spending.

This is most CERTAINLY one of Bitcoins biggest pain points.  Maybe tied with privacy.

A decent compromise:  Use a well reviewed and vetted hardware wallet to do the above.

A somber prediction:  "Bitcoin banks" and all the trust and regulatory risks that come with them are an INEVITIBILITY in the foreseeable future for almost all normal users.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2617

Dear Mr O'Leary, I have Bitcoin available for you that has been mined by caucasians only, I guarantee it. Not a single Chinaman has been involved. The energy used for mining has come from caucasian resources only involving a combination of sweet farts and lots of ethical bike peddling.
For you sir the friendly price of this caucasian mined Bitcoin is currently only $120,000.00 per coin.

Please contact me asap.
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


And Bhutan is vaccinating it's whole population in one go. https://www.zmescience.com/science/bhutan-vaccination-campaign-05042021/



They sound like a bunch of retards to me.

Quote
That meant that Bhutan authorities waited until the passing of an ‘inauspicious’ month to start vaccination.

    “Upon consulting with Zhung Dratshang (the Commission for Monastic Affairs), we were informed of dana (inauspicious month) which falls between February 14 and March 13. We will wait until the period is over,” the statement said.

Buddhist astrologers advised the government that a woman born in the year of the monkey should be chosen as the first person to receive the vaccine


What are they a welfare state for India?

Quote
As a gift from India, Bhutan received in January 150,000 doses of Covishield vaccines manufactured by the Serum Institute in India – followed by a second shipment of 400,000 vaccines in March. India has also supplied Bhutan with medicines and medical supplies, including paracetamol, PPEs, N95 masks, test kits, and x-ray machines.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
Yes that’s always true “Not your keys, Not your coins”

One question how much can we trust these third party wallets then? Specially these wallets on our mobile apps. Although they give us access to the private keys but still can we trust them? I have been using Jaxx. But often I will open my wallet to confirm my coins are still there or some developer of Jaxx have already transferred my funds to some cold wallet :p

Why use Jaxx when Bitcoin for Android and Electrum works? What do these other wallets have? I understand some like Casa and Unchained are multi-signature services but you can also do those on your own.

Does Jaxx publish their source code for the app? Can you compile it yourself and check?
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1422
please, when moon sir?
not now sir, I'm buying the dip here.
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 3614
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
please, when moon sir?
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 292
I don't know where I'm going, but I'm going.
I am not anti-trusted layers... but I will not be parking any significant value on any of them, that's for sure.

Yes that’s always true “Not your keys, Not your coins”

One question how much can we trust these third party wallets then? Specially these wallets on our mobile apps. Although they give us access to the private keys but still can we trust them? I have been using Jaxx. But often I will open my wallet to confirm my coins are still there or some developer of Jaxx have already transferred my funds to some cold wallet :p

My coins are in cold storage only, just a small amount to fck around with shitcoins is on exchanges.

Delta gives me enough overview of everything, no need to access my coins via phone.
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 292
I don't know where I'm going, but I'm going.
Which will be first?

Sub 57k or 60k+?

I bet on the latter.
copper member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2890
I am not anti-trusted layers... but I will not be parking any significant value on any of them, that's for sure.

Yes that’s always true “Not your keys, Not your coins”

One question how much can we trust these third party wallets then? Specially these wallets on our mobile apps. Although they give us access to the private keys but still can we trust them? I have been using Jaxx. But often I will open my wallet to confirm my coins are still there or some developer of Jaxx have already transferred my funds to some cold wallet :p
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
A guess: Alts continue to rise BeCaUsE tHeY aRe So GoOd

Alts are crap but Bitcoin continues to have a capacity issue.

This will be one of the keys moving forward... it is an interesting detail.  2nd layers are still nascent, and most of them are trusted.  But I think trusted 2nd layer use will be encouraged.

I also am developing the theory that the 6102 of our generation will come about through these trusted 2nd layers.  You leave your coins on CashApp, PayPal, Blockfi, or the exchanges, there MAY come a day when you CANNOT take possession of them with keys you control.

I am not anti-trusted layers... but I will not be parking any significant value on any of them, that's for sure.
copper member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2890
For us these 59-57-59 daily action is quite boring, but for the daily traders who follow the trend it is like living in a scary movie (which they put themselves into because of their stupidity). I guess they screem like little girls when selling with a "stop" loss each day, until their "stop" loss adds up to a complete loss of their resourses. I am lazy to write the code counting all their losses, but it seems that the turning point when these weak hands will be removed from the game is quite near.

legendary
Activity: 1891
Merit: 3096
All good things to those who wait
For us this 59-57-59 daily action is quite boring, but for the daily traders who follow the trend it is like living in a scary movie (which they put themselves into because of their stupidity). I guess they screem like little girls when selling with a "stop" loss each day, until their "stop" loss adds up to a complete loss of their resourses. I am lazy to write the code counting all their losses, but it seems that the turning point when these weak hands will be removed from the game is quite near.

Edit. I've just noticed that the volume of the latest stop loss is 4-5x bigger than the previous dips in the last days. So there is a good chance that this will be the last dip before breaking 60K and heading towards 100K in the next weeks.
Jump to: