A few points about your proposal:
1) That would be a pretty crazy rule to likely stifle creativity (and likely contributions, too).. It probably would cost more than it benefits, especially when there are easier solutions, such as ignore, skim and perhaps other solutions too.
2) Your proposal does seem to presume that there is a cost to long posts that outweigh their benefits.
3) relatively speaking, you are a pretty (not in a cute way) newbie in these here parts to be making such broad and sweeping proposals - and sure anyone does have rights to make any kinds of stupid-ass proposals to his/her likenings, and perhaps you are making such proposals in jest or a kind of provoking kind of funzies (trolling?), way. perhaps? perhaps?
Of course I'm newbie in bitcointalk and bitcoin community overall... and I accept this and no offense to the mighty seniors.
Btw I do enjoy your and nullius post and I spare time to read your long posts.
Any way it wasn't a proposal but...
..infofront, please lock; it is over.
Is this
"stupid-ass" proposal too?
Fair enough, shahzadafzal-daffodil.
Frequently, there are
"stupid-ass" proposals coming from all kinds of member angles, not limited to and including yours truly.
So, I am glad that you did not get too worked up about my response to your brainstormenings about such lengthenings of posts.
Surely in regards to length and quantity of posts, you have ultimate discretion regarding the extent to which you might skim or skip them including deciding which members to read and which ones to skip or skim in terms of your perception of their babbling tendencies, and I have even mentioned on numerous occasions, when I fall behind, I might ONLY look at the posts that have interesting pictures, and likely other guys have their own ways and methods of involving their lil selfies in the thread including skipping pages completely....
If any one peep falls behind 30, 50, 100 or even 500 or more pages (which may be around a couple of months of posts), it can become quite a daunting task to trying to get through some of those backlog of pages in any kind of substantive way.
Some folks here might recall a couple of years Friends1980 made a pie in the sky assertion that he had planned to read the whole thread from the beginning.. blah blah blah.., and sure he might have read the first 100 to 1000 and maybe even skimmed through several pages before he completely abandoned such project with reluctances to ever mention his
"stupid-ass" proposal that ONLY involved his own conduct rather than asserting how the thread should be carried out in the future, blah blah blah...
