Probably you should elaborate a bit more in order that we get some better ideas about from where you are assessing this whole matter, Saniati... and welcome to this thread.
For sure, we know that bitcoin is continuing to change and get increased adoption, so that was even true in its earlier years, so currently we might have a matter of increase, but still there remains some questions regarding whether if the increase in acceptance is merely within a range of expectations - because to take the BTC price from $250 to $20k in 2017 needed a certain level of increased adoption over when it was taken from $10 to $1,163 - mostly in 2013.
So today, to take bitcoin from $4k-ish to supra $20k and thereby likely into the 6 digits - such as somewhere between $100k and $500k for this particular cycle, then seems that there would be some quantity of need for increased adoption because I doubt that the existing users would be able to pump BTC to nearly such extent as it ends up getting pumped by institutional investors such as Michael Saylor coming on the scene and providing pretty strong narratives/justifications as to why some of the institutional investors might consider bitcoin as a decent way to hold some of their assets, so even though guys like me have been recommending 1% to 10% into bitcoin, guys like Saylor are coming out of the gates with way higher percentages causing people like me look as if I am too conservative.. hahahahaha.. do I give a ratt's ass? I am sticking with my recommendation, even though there are going to be some of the BIGGER players getting rich as fuck, even if it seems that they are leaning quite a bit into how high of a percentage of their investment portfolios that they are putting into BTC.