Here you go:
Now it looks good where we are.
Of course, the four-year fractal comparison is helpful to figure out where we are at in the cycle and if we are ahead or behind previous four-year periods.
For some reason, I like to also see the cross asset comparisons in order to attempt to appreciate what might be going on between asset classes in terms of bitcoin - and those kinds of charts might shed light on debunking some un/correlation claims - I mean comparing bitcoin to the stock market and gold.
I also understand that sometimes the cross-asset comparisons could be presented in ways that might cause them to seem a bit jankie in terms of how long is the time horizon for the comparison - so a question would be what is the starting point for a possibly meaningful comparison, and of course, the longer the time horizon for the comparison, the more likely that bitcoin is going to outperform almost any other cross comparison asset.
On the other hand, in the short term there may be some correlation and even under performance in bitcoin as compared with some other asset classes - which really does not even seem to be the situation, currently... of course, if the starting point were to be bitcoin's December 2017 top, then that would reflect more negatively on bitcoin (relatively speaking), but December 2017 would likely not be a very representative starting point.....
Maybe the beginning of 2017 would be a largely fair starting point, which would have been around mid-point of the early UP cycle (and around the ($1k-ish) price point where BTC broke back above its 2013 highpoint).
===> #
