Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 7887. (Read 26608813 times)

The Guppy by Ogden Nash

Quite extraordinary that scientists agree what ails the guppy ails the human and it can all be cured by ground-up mosquito coils.
But kindly don't bite the bittens, that's icky.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHe0bXAIuk0

Starts ELI5 easy, then gets much more sophisticated, but it's good on how money and the economy works.  Also shows cycles and explains a credit crunch and the balance between printing money and getting right (or wrong).

See what you think, but it's a start.

It doesn't explain the abuse and rampant Wall Street skulduggery, mind, but you'll find more that do, I am sure.

Maybe we should consult Gwyneth Paltrow.
She’s working on a quack Goop remedy for this nasty bug no doubt.....

Finally it's here! Happy 1st of April folks!   I love da ass!


Read the WIPE-Paper! https://blog.coinmarketcap.com/2020/04/01/toilet-paper-token-wipe-paper/

DATA? But have you read the paper (actually only 1 preprint) published about this treatment?
No guys this is pretty incredible


LOL I AM PHARMACIST WORKING ON THIS FIELD! You are not able to see the difference?!?  
If your car have a problem you ask information to ... SHOEMAKER?!?
You talk ABOUT DATA and there is only 1 work published WITHOUT ANY DATA THAT ARE YOU CLAIMING !!!!


Are you able to confirm what are you saying "about profylactic" usage of these substances?  If you're not able to provide anything about that and these are based on your OPINIONS (meaningless and worthless opinions since you don't know what we are talking about...)  no you can't encourage no one!


It's very strange since FDA has not approved this as an official treatment but as compassionate use... you should be more incisive during FDA meeting since it seems that no one want listen your opinion

LOL Based on DATA that you're imagine, based in a study with a lot of weak points, and based in an explanation that you have not read.


Ah I forget... it's totally worthless if some doctor claim this prophylactic usage without any reference and without any data...  
Other doctors are not fool or stupid that waste time running trials evaluating medicine in scientific and rigorous method!
Did you have miracle substance? OK PROOF IT or SHUT UP!
FDA and other health authorities have been developed to avoid THESE USELESS CLAIM WITHOUT ANY REFERENCE !

 

Funny thought I saw that on a prep h box somewhere but can't find the image.

anyho...

Dow has worst quarterly performance since 1987

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-market-news-live-updates-march-31-2020-221319837.html

The treatment scheme which I got says specifically "prophylactic".

It is once or twice a week for that purpose.

For those who have visible symptoms, the dose is higher. Like twice a day.

Maybe it is like what bitserve said, the workers already have the bug so they are using it to prevent the bug from reaching their lungs.

Are we mixing up the words 'prophylactic' and 'suppository'?
I mean, it's fine, just tying to keep up.

I only know one hospital but it is possible that there are others. I just don't know about the others, yet.

Maybe "prophylactic" is not the right word to use... but when you can't know if you have already been infected because lack of testing and symptoms in the early stage and you only know you have been clearly exposed (like most health workers currently have been) it makes some sense to use it. I guess the health workers you know are using it on their own as a preventative measure... or has it been approved by protocols or directives on that particular hospital?

I think strawberries can play a big role in curing COVID19.

Interesting fact



Source: https://twitter.com/unchainedcap/status/1245057902932627456

I'm giving you a merit solely for not trying to give the impression that you know anything at all about how to treat viruses

Tbh I heard doctors saying both that it has a prophylactic use and not.

In a time like this where 2 doctors can suggest the exact opposite of something you can't really say that science is the way.

If 2 doctors can be different than each other like it is black and white I think everybody can have his/her opinion on the matter because we are all like headless chickens right now.

Just don't swallow more than 1 pill in a week and you should be fine. (as a prophylactic)

*I actually have a proof that the health workers are using hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic. It is directly from a local hospital here. (maybe they don't know what they are doing too. that's also possible)

Quarterly candle close coming soon. The next three and a half hours are critical.

Yes, it is my honest opinion based on available data. I guess you are also giving your honest opinion, and that is fine. I would encourage you to improve your research, at least in relation of your strong statement about "having only been tested for people infected and not for profylactic usage" though. Also, when I say profilactic/preventive I mean it can help stop slow the reproduction of the virus once infected not that it can prevent infection but as you can never know when you are going to be exposed/infected maybe, just maybe, it makes sense to use it preventively in case of people with a very high risk (health workers with not enough PPE) or suspect of infection.

I have never said that there were conclusive and much less an officially vetoed stance about it.
 
Also, please check the very own thread you just posted and the comments about the graph you posted. I do agree with most of them. Not because I know better... But just because those comments and findings are coherent to most other "somewhat" reliable sources I have checked.

That being said, the best thing to do at this time is to avoid getting exposed to the virus and wait till it is safe outside and hospitals are not overwhelmed so that you can receive proper treatment. I guess we can at least strongly agree on that.

P.S.: If I were infected... I would like to have hydroxycloroquine treatment given to me AS EARLY as possible if given the choice. But hey, that's just me and until we KNOW BETTER.

We don't have enough information about real efficacy of that product... first of all (and in ideal word this is enough)

Why are you saying (very confident, like an FDA official ) that this should be used as a PROFYLACTIC.... when actually has been tested only for people infected and not for PROFYLACTIC usage?

Why are you giving your useless opinion about drugs and treatment?
There are not evidence of what are you saying... Seriously...this is science is not "In your honest opinion" is not only totally worthless is also DANGEROUS!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54066125