Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 8044. (Read 26714573 times)

legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 3439
Man who stares at charts (and stars, too...)

Thanks  Grin
Internal dictionary seems corrupted. Will run integrity check asap.

A friend told me (or like the dude says.. I received an e-mail on the topic) that a simple reboot will frequently resolve a lot of those kinds of weird quirks.  (Por supuesto, I would not know this information from actual personal experiences).

Seems more that i "rebooted" too often lately, puts a lot of strain on the drives  Grin
I guess it's time to slow down the cpu clock a little.
Got a lot of vaped weed left from the winter, and fresh milk from the neighbor's cows. With a slice of ginger, all mixed up and heated up slowly to 75° (celsius) should put myself in a nice, cozy, power saving mode. That will do for tonight.
All but one child already sleeping, task scheduler says T minus 1 hour  Grin
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Free if possible.


if it's free...YOU are the product

..or open source. I agree with your general sentiment, but OSS is a bit a different story.

Multiparty collaboration tools require servers to rebroadcast each party's contribution to the other participants. Servers require hardware. Whether running open source or proprietary SW, the HW needs to exist. Who supplies the HW?

Truth be told, each party could multicast to every other party, eliminating the need for a server. But that requires a lot of bandwidth. Each party needs N! times the single link BW. Does not scale well on home networks. Again, pointing out the need for a (centralized) server, for which someone needs to provide.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
Good morning Bitcoinland.

Still over $6k... currently $6310USD/$9140CAD (Bitcoinaverage).

Go Bitcoin go.

Johan Cruijff was not a Dutch philosopher. He was a football player and captain.
He did have some very good quotes...

That's like saying Yogi Berra was not an American philosopher.

 You can observe a lot by just watching.

legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1767
Cлaвa Укpaїнi!
Estimating death rate... I think South Korea's numbers are most reliable, since they don't have authoritarian censorship culture, but they DO have LOTS of test kits available.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-southkorea-toll/south-korea-reports-fewest-new-coronavirus-cases-since-february-29-peak-idUSKBN21A043

Quote
The Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) said there were 64 new cases on Monday, taking the national tally to 8,961. The death toll rose by one to 110.

110 out of 8,961 is about 1.23%.
Wrong formula. It's death/(death+cured). Which still doesn't look bad, in their case.

Would you just stop it with your home made non sense bullshit formula already.
Ball is in your court. Suggest a better method.

The one everybody but you are using.
That method is wrong. We have been over this. Repeatedly. For weeks. There is no reason at all to bring it back up.

No, you have been over this, over and over again. Nobody else has agreed with you. Your'e like Don Quijote.
legendary
Activity: 2145
Merit: 1660
We choose to go to the moon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQZdL_uV-GQ
Out-of-work strippers are delivering food through Boober Eats
legendary
Activity: 4242
Merit: 5039
You're never too old to think young.
Good morning Bitcoinland.

Still over $6k... currently $6310USD/$9140CAD (Bitcoinaverage).

Go Bitcoin go.

Johan Cruijff was not a Dutch philosopher. He was a football player and captain.
He did have some very good quotes...

That's like saying Yogi Berra was not an American philosopher.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Estimating death rate... I think South Korea's numbers are most reliable, since they don't have authoritarian censorship culture, but they DO have LOTS of test kits available.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-southkorea-toll/south-korea-reports-fewest-new-coronavirus-cases-since-february-29-peak-idUSKBN21A043

Quote
The Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) said there were 64 new cases on Monday, taking the national tally to 8,961. The death toll rose by one to 110.

110 out of 8,961 is about 1.23%.
Wrong formula. It's death/(death+cured). Which still doesn't look bad, in their case.

Would you just stop it with your home made non sense bullshit formula already.
Ball is in your court. Suggest a better method.

The one everybody but you are using.
That method is wrong. We have been over this. Repeatedly. For weeks. There is no reason at all to bring it back up.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1767
Cлaвa Укpaїнi!
Estimating death rate... I think South Korea's numbers are most reliable, since they don't have authoritarian censorship culture, but they DO have LOTS of test kits available.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-southkorea-toll/south-korea-reports-fewest-new-coronavirus-cases-since-february-29-peak-idUSKBN21A043

Quote
The Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) said there were 64 new cases on Monday, taking the national tally to 8,961. The death toll rose by one to 110.

110 out of 8,961 is about 1.23%.
Wrong formula. It's death/(death+cured). Which still doesn't look bad, in their case.

Would you just stop it with your home made non sense bullshit formula already.
Ball is in your court. Suggest a better method.

The one everybody but you are using.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1767
Cлaвa Укpaїнi!

Swedish hospitals are taking height for that, they have rented a shitload of freeze containers to keep the bodies in if the crematories can't keep up.

https://www.friatider.se/karolinska-hyr-containrar-tusen-lik
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Estimating death rate... I think South Korea's numbers are most reliable, since they don't have authoritarian censorship culture, but they DO have LOTS of test kits available.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-southkorea-toll/south-korea-reports-fewest-new-coronavirus-cases-since-february-29-peak-idUSKBN21A043

Quote
The Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) said there were 64 new cases on Monday, taking the national tally to 8,961. The death toll rose by one to 110.

110 out of 8,961 is about 1.23%.
Wrong formula. It's death/(death+cured). Which still doesn't look bad, in their case.

Would you just stop it with your home made non sense bullshit formula already.
Ball is in your court. Suggest a better method.

 We're all doing it wrong.
 Population of Italy  ~ 60,480,000
 Deaths attributed to Covid-19  ~ 6,078
 Mortality rate ~ 1.12 per 100,000

 Perhaps we could use a narrower geographic definition by drawing a circle of a certain diameter around with epicenter and estimating the population of that area but I don't have those stats but I'm sure the respective governments do.

Cause-specific mortality rate
The cause-specific mortality rate is the mortality rate from a specified cause for a population. The numerator is the number of deaths attributed to a specific cause. The denominator remains the size of the population at the midpoint of the time period. The fraction is usually expressed per 100,000 population. In the United States in 2003, a total of 108,256 deaths were attributed to accidents (unintentional injuries), yielding a cause-specific mortality rate of 37.2 per 100,000 population.
About 1% of the country is infected. They are all going to get infected. Mortality rate 112%!

No dude. We look at the infected population. It's over 40% by official numbers.

We know the official numbers are underestimating the actual number of infected. But then, they are probably underestimating the number of dead too. Gotta work with what we got.

 We will never know the value of "the infected people" because they aren't testing the entire population.  How can we use this variable so loosely?  It doesn't reflect the reality of the situation and makes it seem more grave than it is.
Which incidentally is exactly what we want. This needs to be taken seriously. And in any case, "people who are sick enough to notice" may be a better metric than merely "infected".
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank

Yes if they came together their noses would still meet the requirement of being 2 metres apart. Law-abiding, these lizards.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
Estimating death rate... I think South Korea's numbers are most reliable, since they don't have authoritarian censorship culture, but they DO have LOTS of test kits available.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-southkorea-toll/south-korea-reports-fewest-new-coronavirus-cases-since-february-29-peak-idUSKBN21A043

Quote
The Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) said there were 64 new cases on Monday, taking the national tally to 8,961. The death toll rose by one to 110.

110 out of 8,961 is about 1.23%.
Wrong formula. It's death/(death+cured). Which still doesn't look bad, in their case.

Would you just stop it with your home made non sense bullshit formula already.
Ball is in your court. Suggest a better method.

 We're all doing it wrong.
 Population of Italy  ~ 60,480,000
 Deaths attributed to Covid-19  ~ 6,078
 Mortality rate ~ 1.12 per 100,000

 Perhaps we could use a narrower geographic definition by drawing a circle of a certain diameter around with epicenter and estimating the population of that area but I don't have those stats but I'm sure the respective governments do.

Cause-specific mortality rate
The cause-specific mortality rate is the mortality rate from a specified cause for a population. The numerator is the number of deaths attributed to a specific cause. The denominator remains the size of the population at the midpoint of the time period. The fraction is usually expressed per 100,000 population. In the United States in 2003, a total of 108,256 deaths were attributed to accidents (unintentional injuries), yielding a cause-specific mortality rate of 37.2 per 100,000 population.
About 1% of the country is infected. They are all going to get infected. Mortality rate 112%!

No dude. We look at the infected population. It's over 40% by official numbers.

We know the official numbers are underestimating the actual number of infected. But then, they are probably underestimating the number of dead too. Gotta work with what we got.

 We will never know the value of "the infected people" because they aren't testing the entire population.  How can we use this variable so loosely?  It doesn't reflect the reality of the situation and makes it seem more grave than it is.

legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1538
yes
legendary
Activity: 1612
Merit: 1608
精神分析的爸
In my country mortgage interest are going bananas since today, but in the opposite direction as expected (+15-25 base points in one day depending on bank for a 10yr mortgage). *

I get a feeling in my gut, that the lockdown/mass-dying is the warm and cozy part of this crisis.

Bullish for BTC, TP and bottled water, but being rich won't help if everything collapses around us.

* psycodad turns from slightly nervous to fucking scared

* (in german) https://insideparadeplatz.ch/2020/03/20/hypo-zinsen-schiessen-hoch/
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Estimating death rate... I think South Korea's numbers are most reliable, since they don't have authoritarian censorship culture, but they DO have LOTS of test kits available.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-southkorea-toll/south-korea-reports-fewest-new-coronavirus-cases-since-february-29-peak-idUSKBN21A043

Quote
The Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) said there were 64 new cases on Monday, taking the national tally to 8,961. The death toll rose by one to 110.

110 out of 8,961 is about 1.23%.
Wrong formula. It's death/(death+cured). Which still doesn't look bad, in their case.

Would you just stop it with your home made non sense bullshit formula already.
Ball is in your court. Suggest a better method.

 We're all doing it wrong.
 Population of Italy  ~ 60,480,000
 Deaths attributed to Covid-19  ~ 6,078
 Mortality rate ~ 1.12 per 100,000

 Perhaps we could use a narrower geographic definition by drawing a circle of a certain diameter around with epicenter and estimating the population of that area but I don't have those stats but I'm sure the respective governments do.

Cause-specific mortality rate
The cause-specific mortality rate is the mortality rate from a specified cause for a population. The numerator is the number of deaths attributed to a specific cause. The denominator remains the size of the population at the midpoint of the time period. The fraction is usually expressed per 100,000 population. In the United States in 2003, a total of 108,256 deaths were attributed to accidents (unintentional injuries), yielding a cause-specific mortality rate of 37.2 per 100,000 population.
About 1% of the country is infected. They are all going to get infected. Mortality rate 112%!

No dude. We look at the infected population. It's over 40% by official numbers.

We know the official numbers are underestimating the actual number of infected. But then, they are probably underestimating the number of dead too. Gotta work with what we got.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1538
yes
[..]

For now, a bullish scenario for a jump to $7,xxx seems to be developing. If the price holds of course.

That surely is worth +1 WO merit... no more no less.  In essence, you seem to be suggesting that the BTC price is destined to go up, in the event that it does end up going up, rather than down or sideways.

Very informative!!!!!   Wink


The secret of every successful stock broker  Grin

It's easier to convey in a picture. I noticed some divergence between price bottoms and indicator bottoms that could indicate a reversal. Nothing more. And we haven't crossed $7,xxx yet  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Four big reasons to be bullish on bitcoin:

1. The case for bitcoin as a form of payment shines.
2. Bitcoin remains a deflationary asset.
3. Bitcoin is currently on sale.
4. Reward halving is only 50 days away.

This is basic knowledge to you guys but I thought you might enjoy this article I wrote on the subject. Just trying to spread the good word in times of strife and bring cheer in the face of the coronapocalypse.

Nice article.. short and sweet.  

Thanks for sharing your "off topic" substance in this coronavirus watching thread. Wink
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
Estimating death rate... I think South Korea's numbers are most reliable, since they don't have authoritarian censorship culture, but they DO have LOTS of test kits available.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-southkorea-toll/south-korea-reports-fewest-new-coronavirus-cases-since-february-29-peak-idUSKBN21A043

Quote
The Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) said there were 64 new cases on Monday, taking the national tally to 8,961. The death toll rose by one to 110.

110 out of 8,961 is about 1.23%.
Wrong formula. It's death/(death+cured). Which still doesn't look bad, in their case.

Would you just stop it with your home made non sense bullshit formula already.
Ball is in your court. Suggest a better method.

 We're all doing it wrong.
 Population of Italy  ~ 60,480,000
 Deaths attributed to Covid-19  ~ 6,078
 Mortality rate ~ 1.12 per 100,000

 Perhaps we could use a narrower geographic definition by drawing a circle of a certain diameter around with epicenter and estimating the population of that area but I don't have those stats but I'm sure the respective governments do.

Cause-specific mortality rate
The cause-specific mortality rate is the mortality rate from a specified cause for a population. The numerator is the number of deaths attributed to a specific cause. The denominator remains the size of the population at the midpoint of the time period. The fraction is usually expressed per 100,000 population. In the United States in 2003, a total of 108,256 deaths were attributed to accidents (unintentional injuries), yielding a cause-specific mortality rate of 37.2 per 100,000 population.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1126
It's all mathematics...!
Non-essential...? Lol! If you get caught I guess you just say it was essential
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Jump to: