Will be fun to read the posts by r0ach and the BCH/BSV'ers.
Why conflate? I fail to understand.
BTC up 5.6% in last 24 hours. This is good
BCH up 14.8% in last 24 hours. This is gooderer.
BSV up 9.6% in last 24 hours. This is gooder, too.
edit: oh - sorry 'bout that, nutildah
Correct. In the last 24 hours.
Extrapolation is a dangerous beast. What makes you think that the relationship between BTC and BCH/BSV will be necessarily linear?
We'll know soon enough.
IMO, the best strategy is Jimbo's. Coins untouched, keep legacy coins in their legacy state (forked coins intact), cash out when the time is right.
I dunno.
You said it'll "be fun to read the posts by BCH/BSV'ers". I'm just trying to put the fun in your day. That's all.
Though I still wonder why you conflate us with The r0ach - the miserably misguided anti-crypto-in-any-form-er, blinded by his/her flawed axioms.
And no, I don't think any such price relationship will be linear. Indeed, it is demonstrably _not_.
Further, in the next FOMO rush, I expect BTC to outperform BCH and BSV.
(::gasp!:: What did he just type!?) Right up to the point of Blockalypse II, when all that demand will be rebuffed by BTC's latent fatal desire to be exclusionary. And all that demand will find elsewhere to go. Into the more faithful renditions of Bitcoin.
Of course, if you have no solid convictions on the matter, Jimbo's approach does indeed make a lot of sense.
The fun will be for different reasons. But it will be fun, that's why both were in the same sentence. That's the only association there.
I also don't think the relationship between BTC and BCH/BSV will be linear, hence my comment on the 24-hour data extrapolated to the $100k/BTC time point (probably 30,000+ hours from now). Based on what I know about BCH/BSV, their team (Wright, Ver, Wu, Ayre
et al.), their history, modes of operation and motives, my bets are on BTC, and that's a solid conviction, that's why I don't hold any BCH/BSV. My coins are where my mouth is.
About the infamous "block size" issue, when a genuine need for a size increase arises (not due to spam attacks of above mentioned team of individuals), I expect a solution to be implemented. Gradually, robustly, in a well thought out, carefully controlled, and thoroughly tested way.
I think we'll all be here to see how it all unravels. Hopefully soon.