Where you at BSv shills? jbreher?
Dunno why you're summoning me. I ain't got no dog in this fight. Do you?
I considered it a black swan event, Faketoshi claimed that once he gives Kleiman the coins he'll have to dump a big chunk of them just to cover taxes
All appears just to be another lie on his way to becoming irrelevant, wanted to hear BSv shills comment on it so i summoned you, great bear/BSv supporter.
You seem to be suffering the commonly-shared echo chamber delusion that CSW and BSV are one and the same. They are not.
But if even you can't put a positive spin on this
I have
no reason to put any spin on this whatsoever.
Though I will point to this:
https://coingeek.com/calvin-ayre-passes-on-buying-dave-kleiman-estate-because-it-holds-no-assets/Yeah, it's CoinGeek. May or may not be true. But it is potentially relevant, if true.
I don't know why anyone is particularly astonished that CSW did not cough up half a billion bux to Ira. He has been consistent all along in stating that he will have no access to the Tulip Trust funds until such time as the keys become available to him - which I believe has been stated to be early 2020. Whether true or not, that has been the claim since years. He obviously can't transfer something he does not possess.
In the meantime, popcorn consumption is epic.
Oh, are they already in the cut Faketoshi off cause he's more of a liability than an asset stage?? Must've missed the memo, but if BSv separates from Faketoshi, they're just another shitcoin without even a claim to Satoshi, is it time for Faketoshi to start BSVclassic™?
That article was a good laugh. So after CSW reached a good faith non-binding agreement with Dave's estate and represented that he had the means to finance that settlement, in parallel, Ayre (the dude who's bankrolling BSv and CSW) commenced a separate good-faith negotiations to acquire that estate?!?
Dave died alone and poor with no assets except for the judge's ruling that CSW hand him
BTC500.000 and half of all of IP before Dave's death. After very thorough investigations by his lawyers Ayre realized that "legal analysis that concluded the estate holds no significant assets." Then oddly out of context Ayre's article felt the need to clarify that his own clown investigation is separate from CSWs non-binding settlement
Craig Wright was never a party to these negotiations and any suggestion that contradicts this is a factual misrepresentation.
It just gets more hilarious after that, and to finish off Ayre felt the need to once again drill in that his retarded negotiations are not related to agreement that CSW reached with the estate.
At no point was any agreement entered into in these negotiations by Ayre or anyone else. Any suggestion that there was a misrepresentation of facts and possibly libelous.
At this point i ran out of popcorn