Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9246. (Read 26714057 times)

legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
Looking to short in the 8.7k area but fear the bulls are to impotent to even try and fill my bids.

bulls are strong these days. happy to left my short behind.


Looking to short in the 8.7k area but fear the bulls are to impotent to even try and fill my bids.

Have you already closed the short that you had opened at $8,420?  smartie pants.

interested in this too! did your former short well?

sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
We need a bigger blockchain so that Fuck you Fatty can be immortalised forever

Wait a minute, are you trying to claim a system that externalizes the cost of storing a record of JayJuanGee's Cheeto purchases forever in a tragedy of the commons scenario that implodes the second nobody is willing to pay the tab is actually viable?  There's a reason the Gavinator used to act like digital shitcoins wouldn't work without pruning, which he attempted to work on but never succeeded.

TLDR:  One way or another, it will definitely not be 'immortalized' forever
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Hmmm, the version "Go fuck yourself Fatman" was also deleted. So, not a program deleting.
Then who is it? Show yourself!

Largely, I agree with the sentiment of your post, but even you realize that repetition of such similar responses even while quoting diptwat fatty, does not really add any value to the thread. 

I have had quite a few posts deleted over the years that upon reflection do not really add much if any value, and of course admin has some discretion here, including imposing harsher penalties on you for continuing to engage in the behavior that they are removing.

This forum is not like a completely free form way to express any god damned thing that you want, even though we know that some posters, sometimes do seem to get away with some pretty outrageous off-topicness and even socially repulsive posts.  In any event, I remain a bit puzzled why you would conclude that your mostly non-substantive posts (beyond a kind of childish form of expressive art) are really worthy of remaining on WO's historical record or that admins (whoever the fuck they are) would have to either explain themselves or admit to which one(s) are deleting your objectively true as non-substantive thread clogging contributions (if you would deem them as such)...

We need a bigger blockchain so that Fuck you Fatty can be immortalised forever

That's a great idea.  It's like saying fuck you to the weather, but you cannot because it is captured immemorial. ... well at least as long as miners are continuing to mine those valuable weather blocks... that may as well be fuck you fatty weather blocks.   Wink 
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
Brothers and Sisters!

if you type into your browser this link below you will always get the latest post of WO. guaranteed!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.new#new

no need to switch to a new page manually.
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
Hmmm, the version "Go fuck yourself Fatman" was also deleted. So, not a program deleting.
Then who is it? Show yourself!

Largely, I agree with the sentiment of your post, but even you realize that repetition of such similar responses even while quoting diptwat fatty, does not really add any value to the thread. 

I have had quite a few posts deleted over the years that upon reflection do not really add much if any value, and of course admin has some discretion here, including imposing harsher penalties on you for continuing to engage in the behavior that they are removing.

This forum is not like a completely free form way to express any god damned thing that you want, even though we know that some posters, sometimes do seem to get away with some pretty outrageous off-topicness and even socially repulsive posts.  In any event, I remain a bit puzzled why you would conclude that your mostly non-substantive posts (beyond a kind of childish form of expressive art) are really worthy of remaining on WO's historical record or that admins (whoever the fuck they are) would have to either explain themselves or admit to which one(s) are deleting your objectively true as non-substantive thread clogging contributions (if you would deem them as such)...

We need a bigger blockchain so that Fuck you Fatty can be immortalised forever
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Hmmm, the version "Go fuck yourself Fatman" was also deleted. So, not a program deleting.
Then who is it? Show yourself!


why don't u just stop with the childish behavior and spam ?


I guess losing money gets to u.


Looking to short in the 8.7k area but fear the bulls are to impotent to even try and fill my bids.

Have you already closed the short that you had opened at $8,420?  smartie pants.
jr. member
Activity: 100
Merit: 5
Hmmm, the version "Go fuck yourself Fatman" was also deleted. So, not a program deleting.
Then who is it? Show yourself!


why don't u just stop with the childish behavior and spam ?


I guess losing money gets to u.


Looking to short in the 8.7k area but fear the bulls are to impotent to hit my orders.



member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 38
Hmmm, the version "Go fuck yourself Fatman" was also deleted. So, not a program deleting.
Then who is it? Show yourself!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=reporttm;topic=178336.503910;msg=52699269


I didn't knew that WO thread has special moderation rules. Shocked

I owe you merits for this bro.

Bookmarking this post to pour merit when I got some,hopefully. Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Hmmm, the version "Go fuck yourself Fatman" was also deleted. So, not a program deleting.
Then who is it? Show yourself!

Largely, I agree with the sentiment of your post, but even you realize that repetition of such similar responses even while quoting diptwat fatty, does not really add any value to the thread. 

I have had quite a few posts deleted over the years that upon reflection do not really add much if any value, and of course admin has some discretion here, including imposing harsher penalties on you for continuing to engage in the behavior that they are removing.

This forum is not like a completely free form way to express any god damned thing that you want, even though we know that some posters, sometimes do seem to get away with some pretty outrageous off-topicness and even socially repulsive posts.  In any event, I remain a bit puzzled why you would conclude that your mostly non-substantive posts (beyond a kind of childish form of expressive art) are really worthy of remaining on WO's historical record or that admins (whoever the fuck they are) would have to either explain themselves or admit to which one(s) are deleting your objectively true as non-substantive thread clogging contributions (if you would deem them as such)...
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1767
Cлaвa Укpaїнi!
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
Hmmm, the version "Go fuck yourself Fatman" was also deleted. So, not a program deleting.
Then who is it? Show yourself!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=reporttm;topic=178336.503910;msg=52699269

legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1767
Cлaвa Укpaїнi!
Hmmm, the version "Go fuck yourself Fatman" was also deleted. So, not a program deleting.
Then who is it? Show yourself!
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 270
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
update on my hedge adventure: my short was stopped out after it failed to break through a support level.

conclusion: I still see no advantage to hedge right from the start. rather the opposite. make the decision which direction you prefer at the start and save roll over costs of the position in the direction you don't need.

https://i.imgur.com/2zQWiSU.png

Brother what is the time frame to this candle stick pattern? 1minute?  

1 hour Brother. the spread is 115 points. with this spread and low volatility it makes no sense to trade on lower time frames.

Likely instantly profit to people’s follow 15 & 30 minutes time frame  paople are may be newbie or day trader follow,   i don't know market what is the timeframe  easyly understood market, trading easy for fool Grin
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
update on my hedge adventure: my short was stopped out after it failed to break through a support level.

conclusion: I still see no advantage to hedge right from the start. rather the opposite. make the decision which direction you prefer at the start and save roll over costs of the position in the direction you don't need.

https://i.imgur.com/2zQWiSU.png

Brother what is the time frame to this candle stick pattern? 1minute?  

1 hour Brother. the spread is 115 points. with this spread and low volatility it makes no sense to trade on lower time frames.
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 270
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
update on my hedge adventure: my short was stopped out after it failed to break through a support level.

conclusion: I still see no advantage to hedge right from the start. rather the opposite. make the decision which direction you prefer at the start and save roll over costs of the position in the direction you don't need.



Brother what is the time frame to this candle stick pattern? 1minute? 
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
update on my hedge adventure: my short got stopped out after it failed to break through a support level.

conclusion: I still see no advantage to hedge right from the start. rather the opposite. make the decision which direction you prefer at the start and save roll over costs of the position in the direction you don't need.

legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 2540
<>


The Investment Case for Bitcoin
Quote
Bitcoin as a Potential Store of Value
Bitcoin’s Role in an Investment Portfolio
Accelerating Bitcoin Adoption
https://www.vaneck.com/globalassets/home/us/blogs/bm-blog-categories/vaneck-digital-assets--the-investment-case-for-bitcoin.pdf

Greetings WO,s

Good article for the first coffee of the day.
sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
Quote
Plaintiffs David Leibowitz, Benjamin Leibowitz, Jason Leibowitz, Aaron Leibowitz, and Pinchas Goldshtein individually and on behalf of all others similar situated, bring this action against iFinex Inc., BFXNA Inc., BFXWW Inc., Tether Holdings Limited, Tether Operations Limited, Tether Limited, Tether International Limited, DigFinex Inc., Philip G. Potter, Giancarlo Devasini, Ludovicus Jan van der Velde, Reginald Fowler, Crypto Capital Corp., and Global Trade Solutions AG.
tldr: <<>> suing tether
yes, priced in, just popcorn

According to squatter if it's a RICO lawsuit it's likely to get thrown out of court before it even begins.

You can easily bring RICO charges against Bitfinex for the amount of insane, crooked shit they've done.  Everything from trading on their own exchange MtGox-style with money that doesn't exist, then stealing all customer deposits and claiming they were 'hacked' after the trade went against them.  It's not possible it was just one person who had internal knowledge of that, there's obviously several.  Then there's Giancarlo who appears to also have been colluding with Chinese Bitcoin oligarchs probably helping them rig the price, launder money, and get kickbacks from it.  I would go after Giancarlo as the soft target to bring down the criminal Bitfinex operation.

You can also easily bring RICO charges against Ethereum and others for issuing illegal IPOs then using both the money they received and pre-mine they gave themselves for free as margin collateral to artificially manipulate the price of the fake asset they created out of thin air to the moon in a pump and dump scam to defraud others on purpose.

Jump to: