^^
NP jbreher will keep pumping/supporting that one
NP jbreher will keep pumping/supporting that one
Clearly BSV led that drop. Little ol' BTC merely caught in the wake.
or smth
Whatevs... I have all the time in the world.
One will not say that when he’s under the dirt......
No man got all the time in the world....
When one is in the catbird seat, the difference between the end of the world and 'it doesn't matter' is merely academic.
Well hopefully you are referring to you BTC investment rather than bcash or various varients of bcash, which are both likely to perform less well than bitcoin.
Of course, if you have a smaller portion in bcash, then you still might do o.k., but not as well as if you ONLY held bitcoin.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
That's an evasive response if I had ever seen one.
No evasion whatsoever. If one reads and ponders, that response is all that need be said.
You seem to be of the notion that since BTC is doing well relative to the other Bitcoins at the moment, that it will do so for all time.
I was indicating evasion because you did not really respond very specifically regarding how much you still seem to be allocated into bcash shitcoins in comparison to BTC, and in that regard, I was trying to get some kind of sense about whether you were really prepared with bitcoin rather than to be betting on stupid ass bcash variants, as if they have sufficient fundamentals to enjoy long term price appreciation rather than just sham-based pumpenings that are fueled by deceptions rather than concrete contributions of either of the bcash variants.
I don't need to repeat that there are no other bitcoins, but sure you and the other bcash pumpeners are habitually talking that kind of nonsense and hoping that it resonants some naive people.
As you are aware, my thesis is that Blockalypse II is in BTC's future, which will drive adoption to the other Bitcoins.
Yes. A bit of fantasy land that you believe is relevant to this thread.
1) blockalypse II implies that blockalypse I has already happened, which neither the facts nor logic support such historical rendition.
2) for the sake of argument, let's assume that there is some kind of problem with bitcoin, there is quite another leap of faith that network effects will go over to some stupid ass bcash variants, but sure you have a right to have your lil fantasy. This whole response is based on a knowledge that you are referring to other coins as other bitcoins, and even attempting to proclaim that have the name bitcoin or even having some common history with bitcoin before the shitcoins forked off would give the shitcoins higher levels of claim to receive various network effects from bitcoin... a very long shot, maybe in the less than 1% region, if I am NOT being too charitable by giving such a high percentage chance to your little fantasy playing out in any kind of semblance that you would hope.
3) what you are really hoping is that your bags pump.... and maybe this time you would become smarter to get out of your shitcoin holdings, but I really have my doubts, at this time and based on your seeming persistence with your ongoing and even seeming to double down to some extent with your nonsensical assertions.
This is an episodic event, consisting of a sea change in BTC's operating environment. Such an precipitating event may result in a snowball into the more capacious Bitcoins, each of which fits the purity narrative of hewing closer to the initial protocol design.
Your further explanation does not really help, but hey, if that is what you believe, then so be it.
IOW, Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
This logical part is true, but applied to continued bitcoin dominance, and your anticipation of the direction of future of BTC's networking effects, your perspective is still quite seemingly squarely within the far reaches of fantasylandia.
