Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9451. (Read 26708972 times)

You said Yachts, not yacht.
Noted.
Well done bro!

I can be rich the fuck I want, I will never buy a yacht.
This is the three top reasons:

• These animals are thirsty. I do spare you the amount of cash you have to spend to fill the tank. I can be richest person in the world, I'm not going to literally burn my money.
• These animals are a money sucking machines. Just letting them sit at the pier  they drain your finances.
• There will always be a longer,sleeker, faster yachts than yours.

If you want to buy a yacht for the girls, well, I see your point, but there are better ways to do that.

Next time he should use an IBM XT and print out on a dot matrix printer  need to check if nickname
 VintageTA is available

Regarding the price following the halving -




@newsbtc

Bitcoin price rose over 13,000% following the first halving and 12,000% after the second.

If $BTC was to rally by similar percentages from its current ~$10,000 price point, the eventual top may be between $385,000 and $425,000.

https://twitter.com/newsbtc/status/1171300417998712832?s=20

I need to start looking at yachts

Taking a photo of the screen to post your TA, no matter if bearish or bullish, that's worth a merit in my book.

O.k. If that is how you want to interpret matters, then suit your lil selfie.  You are going to do what you want anyhow, so it should be no water off of this duck's back.

Waiting for $80k is fine too, but part of the reason that you had decided (ahead of time) to cash out at various price points between $50k and $80k is because you don't know, and each of those cashing out price points give you comfort and security (and insurance) for if the bottom falls out before $80k.  And, I recognize that your first cashing out price points are going to provide you with a kind of learning point... learning about yourself and if you can accept that the BTC price might never drop down low enough to meet your buy back point(s) and allow you to buy back.. so you learn to allow the price to come to you, but yes, you are nervous, because it is the first time that you strategically and pre-meditatively sold BTC within your newly established system that might cause you to leave that fiat behind and just spend it rather than waiting to reinvest in BTC with it..



Tweak it a little bit JSRAW?  Something like that might work for you?  Perhaps?

+1
Holy Moly Stash management 101

I see.  I guess we should allow cats to drive cars too.

We don't feed roach in here. He's never been the same since that accident with his boyfriend

I find Elliott wave offensive to the senses due to the fact:

1)  Their charts above all other charting methods claim the markets are deterministic in nature when they aren't.  They imply a butterfly effect with correlations between vast distances of time and action even though a large amount of real world market moves are just people doing things like rigging to sweep longs and shorts or run counter trades against whatever the dominant leverage position is.

2)  Anytime they get something wrong they just claim their subjective counts were off and then supply you with a new deterministic chart with completely different results from the first one that will also fail - repeat to infinity.

hahahahahaha

Negotiation continues to be butt hurt.

Protip:  It is NOT so much a problem to talk about bcash if you are comparing and contrasting bcash (or even some other shitcoin) with bitcoin or bashing on it rather than pumpening it.

Of course, we are engaging in speculating, but we are also engaging in investing.  There are a lot of ways that practices can vary depending on length of time or amount of deliberation regarding percentage allocated in bitcoin as compared with other investments, and also whether a person is merely guessing or if they might have their expenses projected out into the future, including covering expenses and thereafter considering how much discretionary value is left to speculate or invest..



That is a scenario that was based on some ideas that mindrust gave regarding his cashing out intentions, and I presented him with some alternative ideas regarding another scenario that is different from his, but might better help him to maintain his goals while cashing out part of his BTC stash along the way, that is if BTC adequately cooperates.



That is not my plan, exactly because I am selling less BTC on the way up, but I am also selling sooner, including currently... but in my current, tentative plan, I would also have a higher percentage of my original BTC in the event BTC were to go to $600k or higher.

Of course, I might change my plan to become more aggressive in the selling arena, as mindrust seems to want to be, but currently, I am not in such mood to be aggressively selling BTC.


Well, yeah, the proceeds from the sales could be for consuming or investing in something else or it also could be just to hold in the event BTC prices fall back down and to use the proceeds to rebuy.  Each person has to decide where s/he falls in that regard.


I agree.  Mobility of asset, increasingly more liquidation options and self-sovereignty over assets should be major considerations for everyone to want to keep some BTC, even if the price might be dropping.

Maan $8k feels like a dream I would instabuy 1 piece but I know it is not going to happen. Go bears!

Wait so Bitcoin = bad because Segwit is "indeed an alteration of the Bitcoin protocol"
but bcash Bsv = good because their shitty changes are "legitimate claim to a protocol change"

That is indeed pretty f'ing funny. If not for your constant desperate shilling of shitcoins, you almost passed as an intelligent person, a shame really.

Utilitarianism you say?  If it's an action that can bring joy to vast number of people, then let's base on the saying that charity beginnings at home, women(some are the opposite though) are the back bone of joy in the family trying had to make necessary changes to bring about joy and overall well being in the family.
This is 2019 and every individual irrespective of the gender, race, religion etc is qualified to Vote and be voted for. However every qualifications or criticism should be based on the individual not a general view of the person sect, race gender, background an so on.

Ok let me spell it out. My simple argument was that no one cares about the original design, all things change and improve all the time, and even hv_ link proposed long standing standards have indeed went through few revisions as well. Apologies if it went over your had, didn't mean to make you look for smart contracts in IPv6 specs  

Damn, how I missed these bearish TAs   So this one says we're going down to 8k? Well noobs and weak hands I guess it's time for you to sell because the world-famous BTC analyst maxreish says so.  

JayJuanGee, as the smartest person in the thread and the one we generally delegate all decisions to, do you believe women should be allowed to vote when they're genetically incapable of practicing utilitarianism - the foundation of modern civilization - and only exist to practice provider targeting, acquisition, and resource extraction?

Yes.  Perhaps I was just trying to be nice to the roach. 

I have been thinking that roach probably has a mean grandma, so I kind of feel sorry for the fella from time to time.

Excuse me for being a noob, but I was wondering if you could tell me what protocol version physical silver and gold are running on.  I'm worried that I will lose all my money by not using the correct physical silver protocol.