Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9506. (Read 26611276 times)

Exactly.

BTCitcoin there is only one.

But there are some fake coins with bitcoin name on it.

- Bitcoin gold
 
- Bitcoin cash

- Bitcoin Diamond

- Bitcoin SV

- Lightning Bitcoin

Still there are some people who can't differentiate bitcoin from these shitcoins.

as stated before, my primary objection to the whole goddamned thing

if it's in coinbase(or any other third party app) it will be!!    ~n00bs will get rekt.

Of course Bitcoin can be faked.  PoW does nothing to solve rough consensus attack.  You can have forks where there's no real 'winner' fork and the so-called minority fork doesn't die which seems to have already happened a few times.  It was thought they would need to have different algos for that to occur so the fact it can happen with the same algo is hilarious and just shows you how wrong most assumptions about Bitcoin are. 

'Forking' is not supposed to be some type of pre-planned, conspiracy process decided upon years in advance by people sitting in offices in New York either.  It's supposed to be a much more on the fly, continuous voting process that can spontaneously happen at any second, so having chains that don't die with the same algo is kind of a problem.  Then you have the fact Bitcoin is required to do things like fork everything to be quantum secure, and all those options are completely arbitrary, so there is no 'real' and 'fake' bitcoin at all because who decides in a scheme not governed by longest chain?  They're basically all fake and arbitrary in that context.  Then there's the good old 51% attack, and...why bother.

Recently sold a DSLR for £500, which was bought for ~£320,000.

Seemed like a good idea at the time.

Bitcoin can't be faked, I'm fine with this.

A if any forgery then most likely "in house".
B we are not in dark ages anymore to relay on scales to check purity of gold. Anyone dealing with a kilo gold bar will check for imperfection in a scan.
On smaller lots get a magnet, tungsten is more magnetic, other than that a serious wack with a centre punch will sort it in no time. (want change the weight) A long long time i sold 95% of gold holding, selling the first piece almost ripped the heart out.

Harder to fake silver because molybdenum is used and it's not as close to silver as tungsten is to gold.  Even still, in ultrasonic testing sound waves pass through tungsten almost twice as fast as through gold, so it totally gives it away. There's just a million different ways to test metals now where it's pretty difficult to be fooled if your operating budget is high enough to keep the lights turned on because you'd be able to afford testing equipment.  

Having said that, 1 oz coins (or lower) are by far the easiest to test, so in any metals remonetization, virtually nobody is going to be paying anyone with kilo bars or anything like that besides central bankers storing various bricks.  I think just about all the metals would wind up being melted for small denomination coinage as they should be.  In the old days I think the US govt actually did it for free if you brought your bullion to them.

I look at past purchases every day. Bitcoin related art on my living room wall. Id be dishonest if i didnt consider the relative cost, but i still smile. Then i walk into the toilet and look at my NXTdot painting. At this point, I tend to turn 90 degrees into the mirror, and have a word with myself.

Murdered by Jewish Bolsheviks.

almost like some bizarre collective amnesia...what are the chances?

Bars or ingots may contain tungsten, the density of tungsten similar to gold.

Ingot tests containing tunsgten obtain a purity of 99.9xx% ...

The problem now is the cost of re-verifying the supply chain.

Here they talk a little about this: > https://twitter.com/nic__carter/status/1166716515082756096

LBMA http://www.lbma.org.uk/assets/market/gdl/GD_Rules_16_July_FINAL_20190722.pdf

Haha! Classic!

Yea, paper money has been everything from free floating to a derivative of rice, to a derivative of physical metals and various other things.  But the point is that paper money that doesn't instantly implode usuallly doesn't implode due to being a receipt for an actual commodity resource.  When paper money tries to free float it's far more likely to just be a temporary blip on the radar and insta-die.  You can kind of see how this correlates into being a very negative thing for Bitcoin not being a real commodity or resource and all.  

If technology existed to facilitate Bitcoin's creation in the year 0 AD, it would not exist today.  Not because of dark ages or anything like that, simply because it's not a real commodity or resource and thus there is no reason for anyone to consistently place value in it on a long enough timeline beyond speculation (pump and dump scams).  Bitcoin would and will fall to the wayside like any standard fiat.  Fiats don't die solely due to printing too much.  They can die from people simply not giving a fuck about them because they aren't resources.  Which is why Aristotle says money is required to be a physical commodity resource and why Plato is an idiot.

I'm not sure that paper money started as PM receipts.
This is Marco Polo describing Kublai Khan's paper money in the thirteenth century:

He makes his money after this fashion. He makes them take of the bark of a certain tree, in fact of the mulberry tree, the leaves of which are the food of the silkworms, these trees being so numerous that whole districts are full of them. What they take is a certain fine white bast or skin which lies between the wood of the tree and the thick outer bark, and this they make into something resembling sheets of paper, but black. When these sheets have been prepared they are cut up into pieces of different sizes. All these pieces of paper are issued with as much solemnity and authority as if they were of pure gold or silver; and on every piece a variety of officials, whose duty it is, have to write their names, and to put their seals. And when all is prepared duly, the chief officer deputed by the Khan smears the seal entrusted to him with vermilion, and impresses it on the paper, so that the form of the seal remains imprinted upon it in red; the money is then authentic. Anyone forging it would be punished with death.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/08/05/the-invention-of-money

Hey, bro.  If they make it illegal to be white, just don't be white.

You don't have any those problems if you're not insulting anybody. If you want to make fun, cashout at 100k or 1 mln and have fun.

If you want a horrifying glimpse of the SJW future and non-fungible, digital shitcoin future, here it is:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonathanberr/2019/06/17/neo-nazi-website-daily-stormer-ordered-to-pay-41-million-to-dean-obeidallah/#79c229535494

You make fun of some random muslim guy on the internet and they can sue you for $4 million and win.  If your money is in a bank, it will just be instantly seized by Jewish Marxists at the bank and transferred to someone else via power of the Jewish occupied court.  But how is Bitcoin really any different?  If your money is in any type of non-fungible, digital tracking and slavery blockchain system, your identification is already going to be linked to whatever coins you have and monitored in real-time in giant corporate and govt databases.  

Since a handful of (((corporations))) whose shares were acquired through (((financial manipulation))) own everything, they will all circulate shared blacklists to make your tokens toxic waste and unusable, and mixing will be prosecuted as a laundering crime.  Any real world point of sale use is also going to trigger your whereabouts and movement patterns, then the same Jewish occupied banks and courts will swoop in to try and steal your entire life savings for your $4 million fine for making fun of muslims on the internet when they become unhappy with simply blacklisting your non-fungible tokens.  Even if you don't make fun of muslims, you will accidentally call someone a tranny (which is hate speech) and get the same $4 million fine and lose everything.  TLDR:  Anything non-fungible is worthless garbage.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-gold-swiss-fakes-exclusive/exclusive-fake-branded-bars-slip-dirty-gold-into-world-markets-idUSKCN1VI0DD



Woops, you beat me to it.