Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9637. (Read 26607882 times)

There is no doubt about that!

I believe Bitcoin will make a new ATH this year.

via Imgflip Meme Generator

Yeah, but bitserve just seems to be attempting to employ some kind of word variation creativity, by moving from "fine" to "nice"

Longer quotes:

"This is fine"

"This is nice"

In other words bitserve is getting excited.

Might need to repeat the below LFC post, to more accurately depict what is really going on in the life of bitserve, currently, but his attempt to retain his composure while not wanting to admit it:

O.k.  I am not afraid to give jbreher shit about a variety of things, including his bitcoin bashing, big block pumping or bcash uptalk, but the laddering shit is real, whether he is actually doing it or not might be another story.

Of course, we have to take all of this shit on the interwebs with a BIG ass grain of salt, and ultimately, each of us has to come to our own conclusions.

I recall that I started posting about my laddering in late 2015 into 2016, and I was still trying to figure things out, and jbreher had bashed me several times on this and even saying that  there were reasons that he thought that it did not work including that he had done it before.. blah blah blah...

so yeah, I took his 2015/16 feedback with a decently sized grain of salt because I had already worked out a system, and in the next few years after I have been applying it for a long time, I know that it works really well.  Whether jbreher or anyone else is actually employing the system well or not does not matter, because the system itself works well.  So, if jbreher says that the system works well he is saying something accurate.  If he is saying that he is making a lot of money from such system, then of course, you can take that with some grain of salt regarding whether he is exactly making money and whether he is making money, but really, I think that you are taking it too far.  Of course, we should be skeptical of folks, but merely because they are not credible on some other things such as bcash pumping and bitcoin bashing does not make thing non credible on everything - but I can still kind of understand why you would have your doubts about jbreher because he really has been dragging his name through the mud for a long time with the bcash crap and his dumbass talk of BIG blocks goes back to at least late 2015, if not earlier.





Well. Yeah, we have a variety here, so you won't necessarily appreciate everything.


Maybe it depends on context - because biodom or someone else started talking about how they hate volatility, and there are a lot of folks whining about volatility... .but I say "what the fuck" to that and so does jbreher...   So, I guess I share that in common with jbreher in terms of attempting to profit from the volatility... it's fucking almost inevitable, so why the fuck are people complaining about it so much?  You gotta either learn to live with it and accept it, or better yet to be able to profit from it, to the extent that you are able to profit from the near inevitable.


Yeah but who cares?  I don't really find it valuable to find out what someone real life status might be.  That does not and should not give them any more credibility in these interwebs.  In these interwebs (including this forum) there are other ways to measure credibility, to the extent that it is needed. 

did Toxic say when he'd be back?

Good morning WO gang! It is so refreshing to wake up with a 8%+ daily increase and 25%+ weekly increase. It is equally fun to see a 10x increase of ignored troll's posts here. The pain must be real. Shitcoins and shorts getting rekkt again like:

I know that you are not as dumb as you are making yourself out to be with this repeated lack of scarcity argument.

You do seem to understand the concept of schelling point, but asserted that there is "no schelling point," which is exactly not true.

Bitcoin is the schelling point and remains the schelling point.  There are a lot of shitcoins trying to become the shelling point, and maybe even within bitcoin the schelling point will change, but that seems quite unlikely and seems to be quite clear that bitcoin is dominant within all of the network effects and various ways that those are measured.

Sure, at some point in the future there might be confusion about schelling point, but currently the only confusion seems to be of your own creation and also the creation of shitcoin pumpers, nocoiners, fence sitters and bitcoin naysayers.... several of you dumbasses will come onto bitcoin sooner or later, but some of you, like yourself roach, will continue to downplay actual facts and lose out on opportunities while continuing to pump a dying asset class, namely PMs such as gold and silver.

1H


4H


3D




Graphics ichimoku 1H 4H 3 Days

We are riding a train with a large locomotive, the next destination will be $ 15,000?

Good morning BTC 11545 / WO,s

Don't tell me that we have another one chasing the train...

Common btcbeliever ... common.. run... run ... run.....


I will hold out my hand... hang onto your suitcase and run... you can do it... you can do it.....  


with a name like "btcbeliever," you should not be chasing the btc train, AmiNOTrite?

Even though you are correct, as the BTC price goes up, you are likely to have fewer bitcoins than what you had when BTC's price was lower, that is part of the process, and that is especially true if the BTC price were to go straight up, without coming down (which surely does not happen in bitcoin, even though sometimes it seems like it does).  

I approximately sell 1% of my stash for every 10% that BTC's price goes up, So for example if any person were to start out with 10BTC at $3k, which would have a value of $30k, and started selling 1% of that BTC stash every time the price went up 10%, then the first sales point would be at $3.3k and if the price went straight up to $20k and you were to continue to sell 1% for every 10% price rise all the way to $20k, then, when the BTC price reached $20k, you will have about 8.26 BTC (valued at $166,740) and $16,700.

If the BTC price does not go straight up, then you will be able to buy more BTC on dips, which seems the more likely scenario, and maybe you will be able to retain close to 10BTC or maybe 9BTC, depending on how your orders are set, but in any event, I don't even see any major problem with the "worse case scenario" of the BTC price going straight up.  Of course, you would have had the 10 BTC, but since you only have 8.26 BTC then those sold BTC would have been worth 1.74 x $20k =  $34,800 if sold at $20k, but you only have $16.7k in cash, but you also had insurance and you can set the amounts of insurance that you want to have to be more or to be less -

And you also might not know where the top is, so for example if the BTC price goes shooting all the way up to $100k without correcting (an unlikely happening) then you would only have 6.964BTC (worth $710k) and $83.2k in cash.  I don't see how  you would be suffering exactly by not having the same 10BTC that you started with.

If you happen to be worried that you might not have some kind of target goal of 10 BTC at $100k, then you would have to stack up more than 10BTC at $3k, and following that same system stacking up 15BTC at $3k would still leave you with more than 10BTC at $100k, assuming that the BTC price were to shoot straight up, and you would have $124k in cash too. hahahaha.,.

Certainly you can custom tailor the system to your liking, so I am having some difficulties understanding the problem with it, exactly, unless you are more inclined to gamble or you have some other system that you like, but a laddering system surely will be conservative while at the same time allow you to profit from volatility and to maintain downside insurance.

Yup.

Plus the jump over the resistance happened right after the beautiful weekly candle closing as if everything aligned perfectly to consolidate the bounce from the higher low.

Nice.

You write -- loud 'n' proud -- for sportsbet.io. It's right there in your sidesig, ... whore.

Bathe in the nourishing delight of my golden stream, knave.

Well, your retort was kinda funny. Though I guess I stretched my usual 'wet screen' policy a bit more than a bit.

For those monetary archaeologists trawling this forum in the year 2140, the price of BTC just went from below $11,000 USD (is the USD still a thing in 2140?) to over $11,600 USD in the course of less than three hours.

I'm assuming that is what prompted the comment of 'nice'.

Only in the case of monotonically increasing corn price. But corn ain't nothin', if not volatile.


There's the key.

Jeebus cripes, you love to be obtuse, don't you?

Anyone who was following along at home would know exactly what I was talking about.

But not you. Oh no. I write something, and your inner mental amoeba rises up to blind your eyes and ears to what I am conveying.

To unpack it for you: Every cycle of up followed by down (or down followed by up - pick one) in which the swing exceeds my ladder interval, I make a profit.

Did you really not understand exactly what I meant? Are you really that blinded by hatred? Or are you really that dense?

well now

Gooooooooood morning WO's!

Observing $11,600 (10,400 €) / BTC.



CCMF!

Really? I suppose it makes sense in the sense of Hong Kong. Add the US stock market starting to look soft and hell you could very well be correct!