Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9709. (Read 26610421 times)

Ouch!

F*** I blame my own PIC above, BTC lost its appetite I guess 

WoW a wrong turn of DILDO

Come on a weekend pump instead please THX

-600$ in a minute


NO BAARRTTTTTTTTT 

School kids recently went on a trip to a feminist "art exhibit" and this is what they saw. This is child abuse. This is insanity. This is the lunacy of left wing social engineering in action.


^
WTF and just wauw

https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1154410492938661889

Weak hands selling their coins but the strong hands over come and recover the losses just in 24 hours so expect the prices would stable now and move forward in the next few weeks.

They cry about that question because they don't have any answer to it.  Bitcoin is a Keynesian currency based on artificial scarcity and arbitrary variables.  It is not the "first" anything.  Thousands of artificial currencies have come before it and having it digitized makes zero real difference.  If anything it's a drawback because a peer to peer transaction can actually be done with a physical, paper currency, while every Bitcoin transaction has built-in, rent seeking middlemen and requires three or more parties to do.

In the end, all currencies are garbage, confidence games based on artificial scarcity that start at a value of zero and all return there.  Money - which is required to be a physical commodity resource as defined by Aristotle such as gold and silver - are the only type of monetary instrument worth talking about that aren't Keynesian scams.

There's one thing that has no place in WO. That is discussion of shitcoins. Go here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=67.0.

after 10 years of uptime, uncontested superioirity amongst all other "projects" aka shitcoins, various attacks from within the community (forks) after a full blown civil war, you really think we sit here and wait for guys like you to show up and compare bitcoin vs obvious scamcoins as to vanilla vs chocolate flavour and gladly engage in a discussion about this stupidity?

we do not need to proof to you why bitcoin rules. it does rule and if you think other projects are better you could either fuck off and post in those specific forums with people that also don´t get it, or you could carefully and nicely explain your reasoning and hope anyone in here would take the time and listen and give feedback (which i doubt).

but moving in here and asking questions the 1000th time that we all went though years ago while keeping your nose up as if you know what you are talking about...  ...will not convince anyone in here.  learn about bitcoin and come back afterwards.

Motel 6 in Pittsburgh.  Blue Ribbon all round

https://www.motel6.com/en/motels.pa.pittsburgh.657.html?

What Chuck E Cheese do you guys want to have the $0 Bitcoin party at?


Might be because even though China has stacked a boat load of precious metals, it's still nowhere near enough to cover their enormous population, debts, and economy in any type of reset, so now they're trying to trick people into make believing the imaginary, digital timestamps their country has cornered the market on with Bitmain are actually worth something.  That and the Chinese + US govt are both pure shit and trying to scam their populations into digital only, Chinese social credit score tracking systems and abolish physical money - aka Bitcoin.

If you want to call an implied yield curve of 50 basis points in 2020 as FUD, fine.  The numbers speak for themselves.  

https://www.asx.com.au/data/trt/ib_expectation_curve_graph.pdf

This is with 5.5% unemployment, the stock market making new ATHs and the federal govt is running a surplus. 

I'm beginning to lose my patience with you, jiggy; are you able to have a rational, back and forth discussion without immediately going on the defensive and resorting to inflammatory accusations?

Stop proclaiming that you're the arbiter of my intentions, you aren't.


Refuse to engage or respond? I'm on mobile most of the time, which makes it difficult to format long posts and reply to multiple users.

With regard to our previous discussion, I was asking questions while you would answer; you never actually responded by asking me any specific questions of your own.

If you would like me to answer some specific questions or provide information of some kind, please, ask away!


Incorrect, as I specifically acknowledged the network effect and first mover advantage that bitcoin has, in my previous posts.


Protocol differences between projects definitely exist, you should be aware of this.


I never claimed the bitcoin was broken in any way, you're simply being disingenuous.


I'm not touting anything, I'm asking basic questions about the differences in protocol between projects.

Specifically, I've asked what makes bitcoin "better" or "best".
If your answer to this question is "it's more popular and it got there first", that's fine.

Yesterday the #BankofChina posted up an article about #Bitcoin. They explained how $BTC works, why the price is going up, and why it’s valuable. Never thought I’d see that happen. 😅 #Bullish

https://twitter.com/excellion/status/1154985452127916032?s=21

In conclusion, "Australia is moving to zero interest rates for the first time in history." is FUD.

Thanks for clarifying.

Just like you really don't give any shits about what I think about litecoin, I don't give any shits about such topic.  

First of all, you already failed and refused to engage in genuine responses (rather than poo pooing like a typical troll/shill no coiner) regarding your previous quasi-irrelevant dumbass no coiner / bitcoin naysaying points that I already responded to.. and further,  this is not a thread to compare and contrast various shit coins.  Helrow?

But if you consider the one aspect of bitcoin that you proclaim to NOT accept or understand, you might want to look into network effects, but no, you claim to not understand or believe that such network effects are important in the discussion, instead you want to get caught up in distracting discussions about slight technical differences that may or may not exist and in the end don't even matter in the scheme of things.. because bitcoin is not broken, so you have to overcome that presumption of brokenness first, and you also have to show that your shitty ass project that you want to tout, whether litecoin or some other random project, whatever it is has sufficiently overcome whatever supposedly broken part of bitcoin that it is going to matter, instead of just being possibly absorbed into bitcoin as a tweak.

So, you have a decently goodly-sized burden to prove and to persuade your position if you want adoption within bitcoin to transition over to your project.  You understand that or just want to assert that I am speaking too abstractly for you and you would just prefer to get into the largely irrelevant technological weeds of nonsense?    

The dildo arrived.


Ok, Thx.


No matter if you are married or live together, it is best to share your life with a person who understands and pursues the same goals in life as you.


In my country the most used is > Schweppes Tonic Water.


Thx, Mic

---

5 figures

I have no hangover, I did my job

The perfect evening.

Good morning WO,s

Don’t listen to me. Listen to the head of the Australian Central Bank.   Currently rates are 1% and heading lower for longer.  The market has already priced in a move down to 0.5%.  

https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/pm/inflation-problem-not-going-away-so-rate-lower-for-longer-rba/11347472

Of course A is not equal to B, but they do share similarities in protocol design and proposed use/implementation.

I'd be very interested to hear your take on the differences between litecoin and bitcoin, jiggy.

I know bitcoin, and you, litecoin are no bitcoin.