Possible.. . yeah sure.. but really?
Are you going to really want to argue something in that lame-ass direction?
Is there a way we could potentially outline something like this to be bettable because what you are suggesting it quite outrageous, and you likely know that you would not stand behind what you just said, but you want to appear as if you are "open-minded" while at the same time, you are providing "fair and balanced" fringe nutjob theories as if they were to have some kind of a meaningful chance that would be worthy of serious accounting.
You almost deserve a slappening for that nonsense.... unless you would rather frame your nonsense in acceptable bet terms, then I will forgive you for your participation in this line of thinking.
That's a strange reaction..
Personally, I don't care about gold, but it is perfectly reasonable that it MIGHT be at 5K in 8 years as it is ONLY 2.4X, roughly, or 10-11%/year.
Similarly, it is also perfectly reasonable for bitcoin to be at 1.6 mil in 8 years as it would be 23X or about 48% a year.
Not interested in any bets as I don't have a strong conviction about either of these numbers.
Ok. I admit it. I might have overreacted, since now that go back and I reread your claims, they don't necessarily seem as shocking and/or bad as I had originally understood them to be..... and maybe I was just too irritated by any attempt to be "fair and balanced" when it comes to gold overtaking bitcoin - or any framing that bitcoin and gold are correlated in meaningful ways, especially since bitcoin has already historically been eating gold's lunch, and is likely to continue to go in that direction... even if it might be some modest variation, like you seem to be suggesting, which I also read your initial post as being way more gradual than what you seem to be describing.. but yeah, there is a bit of bearishness to suggest that bitcoin is going to only 10x relative to gold in the next 8 years.. even though, like you specified, bitcoin would be 23xing against fiat and gold would ONLY be 2.4xing against fiat.. so yeah upon rereading it, I am not as outraged as I was the first time around.
EDIT: a keyboard fight? lol
Still sliding at 70k better 70 than 60 but I am waiting on 80.
I can see a trend... - you will never be happy
Looks like we are going to achieve the highest EVER weekly and, at the same time, monthly closing... and both even over the previous cycle peak (not closing) ATH.
Nice.
That is a good point. I had not even noticed how those weekly candles are closing.
I usually don't like to call these kinds of matters, as early as you were projecting it (since at the time that you posted that, the weekly close was still 8.5 hours away), and so far our highest closing candle was 4 weeks ago when it closed at $69,026.. so yeah, the odds are looking greater and greater to close above that current weekly high.. yet we still have 4 hours to go..
Still... even though we are appearing to have momentum, I hate to count my easter bunnies before the easter eggs hatch.
I'm not sure I will live long enough, tough.
Heh. Replacement of gold can happen within the next 4 to 8 years. Replacement of the real estate is going to take a little longer though...
It is all happening simultaneously - especially since none of those other assets are going to be completely replaced by bitcoin. It would mostly ONLY be removing the monetary premium that is getting inefficiently put into those kinds of assets that are not very good monetary goods... so yeah, they will still have various values and maybe even some monetary premium value, just not as much monetary premium as they currently hold, since bitcoin is more efficient in regards to being a better money and therefore deserving of the storage of monetary value.. .so it would be strange to suggest that bitcoin were to have any kind of monetary premium, even though any asset or money can get overvalued, especially during price pumps that end up going on too much and for too long.. so if BTC were to shoot up to $500k within the next 2-6 months, many of us might consider that to be too much too fast.. and maybe we could refer to that as a monetary premium, even though it is a short-term monetary premium not like the kind of monetary premium that a lot of current assets have because they are so pumped by the dollar and the fact that not too many folks (besides Phillip) wants to be holding their value in dollars.. (o..k.. sure i lie a bit since there still is a lot of demand for the dollar since it is the least bad of the large number of MOAR shittier currencies).