Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 9990. (Read 26720873 times)

There are gonna be Jews beating on your door demanding you give them your BTC for turning 6 trillion of them into lampshades.  Literally every single lampshade you see in the world today was created out of Jews.

Do what you like.    I doubt that your phoney baloney would end up showing anything meaningful beyond some amorphous made up shit coming from you.  On the other hand, if you engage in some kind of vindictive efforts to dox me or anyone else or engage in threatening behaviors in that direction, then you might get yourself in a bit of a pickle in terms of your forum account.

It's time to add JayJuanGee to NeoNaziBTCtracker:

35EVP8EePt8dyvKHaB7bXaRmKLm22YgRCA

So you really believe that Stefan Molyneux only has less than 1.5 BTC left in his BTC stash? and the remainder of his 688BTC coins are in the hands of someone else?  

Riiiiight...

What further information do you have exactly to establish and/or support those kinds of conclusions?



Surely, we can rely on the roach to provide us reliably accurate information on a wide variety of topics.  

I think he will probably do okay since the govt asset/disinformation agent Harry Dent claims Bitcoin is going to $30k and every word out of Harry Dent's mouth is 100% disinfo.  If Harry Dent says the price is going to $30k, Bitcoin is probably going to experience the largest crash ever in history.  

Good riddance.  Are you going to be one of those trolls who is good for his word, or one that just lingers the fuck around here for years and years waiting through extreme hopium for the unlikely to happen.... and bothering the smarter ones here who held through.... and have been making a lot of money along the way?

^ I just feel sorry for this dude.

Who needs physical metals?  Step right on up children to buy some govt tracking system tokens:

 

I think that a discussion does not need to have any kind of bearing upon either the quantity of your coins or your other investments; however, quantity of coins can make some differences in perspective, especially when you are likely dealing with less than half of a bitcoin for a stash.  


My current speculative information about your BTC stash comes from my memory in regards to previous representations that you made in that regard.  Of course, times might have changed, too, which means that the size of your BTC stash (including the 100% of your stash that you sold in the $6k price arena) might have changed (such as getting larger) in recent times too.  

Nonetheless, it seems safer for me (and others herein) to presume that you continue to be a kind of disingenuine small potato player in the BTC space unless you make some kind of meaningful and credible representation to the contrary.

I see that new airborne autism has been spreading again.  The entire purpose of Harry Dent being a govt asset/disinformation agent is that everything he tells you is a lie.  He said stay away from Bitcoin in 2016 because the kikes were accumlating it then to pump and dump it higher.  And now he's telling you to buy bitcoin because "it's going to $30k".  Seeing as how everything Harry Dent says is a lie, where do you think the price is really going?  Because it damn sure isn't going to $30k if Harry Dent says it is.

i'll buy back cheaper.  if it's doesn't happen im out. true story

Anyone need kidney? 

"There are no excuses to be a nocoiner.

The biggest-ticket organ you can legally sell in the U.S. is your heart: They're going for a cool $1 million. Livers come in second, worth about $557,000 and kidneys fetch about $262,000 each.

That's like 200 BTC right there."

https://twitter.com/CryptoBull/status/1146115603469623296

do you think an opinion on the price movement, has any bearing on how much i may or may not have?

snicker 

Merited deleted posts are still mentioned in merit.all.txt.
Last week:
I have to leave soon, so can't look into it further now.

Is there a reverse h&s on 1h chart or just me?

I like watches too, but I have a hard time finding anything nice in the higher price ranges.
As a matter of fact, the coolest looking watches I have found have all been in the 15 USD range at Aliexpress and the likes, and i have also bought plenty of those and I where them every now and then.
The exception is the Bell & Ross watches. I like this one https://www.thewatchsource.co.uk/Bell-and-Ross/BR03-92+Heritage+Ceramic.html and this one https://www.jomashop.com/bell-and-ross-mens-watch-br0392-ceram-mil.html

My every day watch however, is a 25 dollar Casio digital with illuminated dial. I've used it for work for over twenty years, I have run over it with a lorry and smashed it against an uncountable amount of things uncountable times, and it still works perfectly, and it is low weight and comfortable to wear. I still wear it as my every day watch.

EDIT: I forgot to tell you about my coolest watch. It's a Pulsar P4 Classic (gold filled), it shows the time in red digits when you flick your wrist or press a button. The "flick your wrist function" is a small tube with a small amount of mercury that flattens out momentarily when you flick the wrist and creates contact between the contact points at the ends of the tube, thus closing the circuit for a short time. https://www.pinterest.se/pin/287386019942888290/

O.k.  So probably their offer already includes any legal fees that might be present in order to create a valid transfer / transfer agreement.

 Any other offer that you might receive, including the one from Hairymcbeary, should clearly include the covering of "costs" too in order to be calculated as an equivalent or better offer.  

One thing that likely exists with a BIGGER player is a kind of economies of scale in that their making multiple offers would cause them to already have sufficient legal representation in place in order to draft up a valid offer that results in valid transferring of interests, that is if they are legit, as you seem to believe.



Well, of course.  Why would they structure a proposed deal that equalizes surplus value?  They are going to structure their proposed offer that would give them a decently large amount of the surplus value, and they hope to get a few bites in regard to their offer (they might not even be making the same offer to everyone, but they would run the risk that inconsistencies might be publicized, so likely safer for them to make the same offer to every GOX coin HODLer during this phase of offers).  

In other words, who makes an offer that would give more surplus value to the counter-party (jo squared in this case) when the counter-party might be willing to accept a lower amount?  So, yeah, they are banking on suckers and/or desperate/motivated HODLers of GOX coins, and question remains whether Jo squared might be one of those kinds of sucker, desperate and/or motivated GOX coin HODLers.

These folks aren’t running a charity.

They probably think the offer is above your dollar cost average and they can take the rest of the upside. 

Are you seriously thinking of selling ?