Not sure what glitches you are referring to, but if you mean the random noise appearing here and there near the price, then nah... thought it looked ok, and was tired working on it so just wanted to get it out. 
Topic: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - page 24. (Read 1811563 times)
Thanks Not sure what glitches you are referring to, but if you mean the random noise appearing here and there near the price, then nah... thought it looked ok, and was tired working on it so just wanted to get it out.
Not sure what glitches you are referring to, but if you mean the random noise appearing here and there near the price, then nah... thought it looked ok, and was tired working on it so just wanted to get it out. 
New song: Blame it on MT.GOX
Great! I'm perma-bull so I don't whine too much about not selling high but you packed in some great ideas! Very creative.I guess you don't consider fixing some minor glitches here and there? Tipping you anyways 0.01Ƀ.
Meh
Paid 5% in fees. So much for low fees and micro transactions. 
that stupid feeling when it might fail more and you don't have fiat anymore
Hmhm, I set it up as my wallpaper.. but its not high res enough
Let me know if you find it in high res, I would like that too. 
Hmhm, I set it up as my wallpaper.. but its not high res enough
that was fast
Found it on google search, here you go:
New song: Blame it on MT.GOX
Very nice, where did you get the picture of Like a Sir with Nyan Cat?
Sorry for double post but unless they're just getting home or taking the time to confirm the wallet transfer to Gox, I can't believe people are selling in the $70s. Any chart shows there's been a decline for two hours already. Do people not like their profit? If they were desperate to cash out, IDK, $90 seems better than $70. Maybe it's just me.
Remember, not all sells are people cashing out at a miserable loss.
-Sold at $88
-Bought at 86
-Sold at 87
-Bought at 84
-Sold at 85
-Bought at 81
-Bought at 80
-Sold at 83
-Sold at 81
-Bought at 78
-Sold at 81
And so on and so forth. Some people have the patience and skillz to sit there and make money on the minute-to-minute. They're the "evil speculators" that our stereotyping occupy-wall-st bear crowd likes to complain about.
Oh no, I totally agree. With the fees in place though, it's a pain to cycle funds at anything less than $2 difference. They'd be earning profit but I'd imagine could also risk getting burned.
Having watched these charts for months now doing nothing but holding I was today toying with the idea of doing some trading but after a couple of times putting ask orders on that didn't quite hit before it went tumbling down again in the end decided to stay out of trading and once again to simply stick with my holding strategy.
It had taken me a while after we didn't get an immediate recovery after the big drop to realise the trading conditions since fall within my parameters for the first time (for me) . Contrary to many here what I would be trading with would be my bitcoin because all the fiat I am prepared to risk on Bitcoin is already all in. So the advice I was once given 'never trade into a falling market' means in the normal bitcoin bull market I would be trading into a falling fiat market. Here though what we've had is a rising fiat relative to bitcoin. But in the end I do believe it will turn around sometime and with a reasonable possibility of it happening quite quickly and sharply. The risk associated with that, combined with my inexperience means I'll likely tomorrow return the temporary bitcoin funding I put on mtgox back to my wallet and go back to watching:)
Well done to all of you who are doing well from it and good luck to those playing it now. I know by just holding I am contributing to the scarcity but I also appreciate what you guys are doing for liquidity
Sorry for double post but unless they're just getting home or taking the time to confirm the wallet transfer to Gox, I can't believe people are selling in the $70s. Any chart shows there's been a decline for two hours already. Do people not like their profit? If they were desperate to cash out, IDK, $90 seems better than $70. Maybe it's just me.
Remember, not all sells are people cashing out at a miserable loss.
-Sold at $88
-Bought at 86
-Sold at 87
-Bought at 84
-Sold at 85
-Bought at 81
-Bought at 80
-Sold at 83
-Sold at 81
-Bought at 78
-Sold at 81
And so on and so forth. Some people have the patience and skillz to sit there and make money on the minute-to-minute. They're the "evil speculators" that our stereotyping occupy-wall-st bear crowd likes to complain about.
Oh no, I totally agree. With the fees in place though, it's a pain to cycle funds at anything less than $2 difference. They'd be earning profit but I'd imagine could also risk getting burned.
come on bulls, buy it up to 90.
I guess that's it for now, I don't think it will go below 80 next few hours
Lol, as soon as I wrote it some sale orders appeared
Lol, as soon as I wrote it some sale orders appeared
if thing happen faster as time passes
then we should have a price graph with the price in log scale and the time in e^(1/t) scale
then we should have a price graph with the price in log scale and the time in e^(1/t) scale
You are a genious!
I'm no math whiz but basically that function would do the same for the time on the x axis as the log scale does for price on the y axis?
I'd like to see a chart of USD/BTC with a 30-day rolling average line, except with the time, as you suggested, e^(1/t). That would be the ultimate chart porn!
Plus it would piss off the bears. See, bears hate log scales, because "regular old" integer scales overemphasize recent price events but de-emphasize past events. So, the 2011 jump looks like a blip and the current crash looks like a train wreck of biblical proportions. Log scales treat a rise from 1 to 2 the same as 100 to 200, getting rid of the psychological barriers. And bears LOVE psychological barriers.
e^(1/t) does the exact opposite of log it "squeezes" the bottom instead of the top (log) of the axis
Actually I think for it to work the x axis should be t*e^(1/t) , t>1 , but I don't have the time to do a graph
maybe someone else can
if thing happen faster as time passes
then we should have a price graph with the price in log scale and the time in e^(1/t) scale
then we should have a price graph with the price in log scale and the time in e^(1/t) scale
You are a genious!
I'm no math whiz but basically that function would do the same for the time on the x axis as the log scale does for price on the y axis?
I'd like to see a chart of USD/BTC with a 30-day rolling average line, except with the time, as you suggested, e^(1/t). That would be the ultimate chart porn!
Plus it would piss off the bears. See, bears hate log scales, because "regular old" integer scales overemphasize recent price events but de-emphasize past events. So, the 2011 jump looks like a blip and the current crash looks like a train wreck of biblical proportions. Log scales treat a rise from 1 to 2 the same as 100 to 200, getting rid of the psychological barriers. And bears LOVE psychological barriers.
Its not over yet..still some trigger selling
Seems to be fixing. I'd have bought in if I had any free cash 
Looks like that was the bottom (for now).
See you at 100 in the morning. (EDIT: I hope)
Looks like that was the bottom (for now).
It's frustrating to think how much momentum/feedback there is in the pricing of Bitcoin. When it's going down, miners are selling --> downward pressure --> holders sell waiting for a bottom --> downward pressure --> would be buyers hold off --> supply expands like crazy. Then on the way up everyone is doing the opposite. I think this crash is going to essentially be an accelerated version of 2011. Sub-$50 pricing , wait for the price to stabilize for 1-3 weeks, then as soon as it starts moving back up for 5-7 consecutive days, the money will come pouring back in. My guess is 1-2 months from now.
this is not far from what I've been thinking. A fast-forward version of 2011. about 10-20 times faster.
If this does happen, would be interesting to see whether the trend of larger bubbles & faster crashes is the mechanism that gets Bitcoin to true mainstream adoption. At some point the volatility would have to just dissipate as adoption reaches its saturation point.
It's the only way i can see it.
if thing happen faster as time passes
then we should have a price graph with the price in log scale and the time in e^(1/t) scale
Jump to: