Topic: War can solve overpopulation issues - page 2. (Read 299 times)

who said you need to live in a town where you can only afford a small apartment, find better cost of living locations

did you know that america is turning into a prison, the wall is not to keep people out, but to lock people in
free yourself, move to a better place, the world is a massive place.. stop letting people tell you its small and you're only allowed one corner of it

Ok, so since I don't have a big space to live in, what can I do, under such circumstances, to achieve a more comfortable and pleasant life? To not raise the population exponentially, because if I do, I will be raising misery and poverty exponentially as well, what will be bad for personal development of each individual inserted on this environment. And when personal development isn't reached by individuals, the elites are more likely to continue ruling the world.

you need to do research
when the international elites invade a country to buy/destroy land. they displace the native population.. then the natives have to find unowned land to set up their camps(slums)

there is enough land available. literally hundreds of thousands of square miles. however people are made to be huddled together in small area's on purpose..

its not a over population problem .. its a land ownership/utility problem

the reason why slums are set up half a days walk away from a river. because they are not allowed to live near the river and are only allowed to walk to it and walk away.

learn the real reasons why it appears people are shoved into small area's and why it seems its overpopulated in those area's then do a google map search of that area and see the wider expanse of unused land right next to them

too many people watch all these charity adverts on tv showing poverty. however what you dont realise is the camera person is being selective of the direction of the camera. and even funnier then that is that when the elitists invade and take over prime land and displace the natives nd force them into slums. its the same elites that then set up the charities to then get the public to fund the charities to aid in helping the people in the slums. thus removing the liability of the elites from paying compensation for the displacement.. yep the elites avoid the compensation because they set up charities to take care of the displaced and then get the public to fund it rather then using their own funds..

the most lucrative land deals in the third world is simple maths: invade+displace+charity=cheap land deals
in first world countries its nearly the same, but its called gentrification

At the moment the world does not have an overpopulation issue.

And it will take many more billions until we could potentially face such issue. Our planet had the capacity to produce enough energy and food so maybe 20 billion can live happy lives, with shelter food security and all modern comforts.
And if we organize our resources better maybe that number could go up evern more. We can reduce waste and utilize public transportation as much as possible, maybe cut back on meat a little bit too. Apparently meat is very inefficient. And slsm create better infrastructure so there's no energy waste from any kind of production. Over producers can transfer their energy to countries with deficit etc.

Anyway. To think that after reaching overpopulation we would need a war to keep population at bay is insanity. It would need to be a war killing hundreds of millions at unprecedented pace...

But the population growth rate is stagnating anyway so don't worry about overpopulation.

War can't and shouldn't be used for or as population control mechanism. The world is large enough to house every living being, the problem is that some rich and influencial elites  are recently feeling entitled about the universe and doing all in their power to depopulated the world.

Saying that war should be used to reduce world population is like taking a departure that the Israel and Hamas war is doing the entire world some good by the number of lives that has been destroyed from attacks on both ends.

 Sadly this depopulation for balance is targeted and mostly suffered by the poor and less privileged in society who is thought to become an economic and security threat.

Funny enough, last time I checked India and China that are said to be the highest populated countries in the world aren't African countries. And maybe if we go further to fact check about the population of China and India put together it could be higher than the entire African continent human population. So what are you really implying mate!

Isn't the world overpopulated? Tell this to a third world country citizen who lives in the slugs with a dozen of people sharing the same room. There isn't life quality for all these people in the world right now. Quality is directly related to low numbers. The most pleasant places are empty, and there is a huge space between one house and another. Take those US traditional neighborhoods for an example.

There is indeed a lot of empty space in the world, but those spaces aren't suitable for people to have decent lives there. It's easy to say the world isn't overpopulated when you live in a quiet, secure, pleasant area, while the rest of the world lives mostly in slugs.

Another example are school classes. Do you prefer joining a class with 30-50 people, or a class where there are only 12-15 students? In which of them the teacher can be more present and attentive to each student's demands and needs?

I do not see any superpopulation issue in general. I think there are certain countries, mostly in Africa, in which family planning is not feasible or is ignored. War is rarely about superpopulation for humans - other species like rats do fight when overcrowded and well before they reach the real population limit.

No, modern human war is about greed, power and the like, an excess of population yields poverty, which yields many natural early deaths and pretty much self-balances.

If you say war can solve overpopulation issues means you are encouraging war bro. War is never a nice way to solve over population humans are not animals that we should come out one day and say we are over populated let's start killing ourselves. The earth is never overpopulated.
Corruption between humans, greed, theft, lies, hatred are over populated we should be looking for the way out of these things then we would know that there is no over population.

Are you a fucking psychopath and out of your mind?  Even if overpopulation were a problem that should concern us, as you claim, do you seriously suggesting that the solution is to kill tens or hundreds of thousands of innocent people through the horrors of war? You are a sick individual. War is never the answer.

we are not over populated
there is enough land to live on and to grow crops

if you feel that your city center apartment is too small but expensive, and you feel the nearby shops and streets are crowded.. well get out of the city

landlords in the city want to make people feel city land is overpopulated as that gives a fake image of demand and thus profit
but once you are out of the city your eyes will open, much like the space you can have by not being a cityboy

It has never been a welcomed insight on reducing overpopulation by wars and looking at the effects of overpopulation, it does not seem a course of critics rather the state of economy to sustain the people should be hold responsible which the governments and the questionable authorities should be blamed because there are definitely sufficient resources ought to sustain the people in both natural and human resources if they are being utilized.

Instead of encouraging war to limit population, I would support the child birth policies of China were individuals are under control to have a specific number of kid (s).
And the government must utilize the public resources usefully to contain everyone's welfares.

If your main focus for instigating War is to reduce overpopulation, you should also be prepared to lose some of your country's assets, including very important productive citizens who would lose their lives during that period of war. War will not be able to distinguish between productive citizens and non-productive citizens, lives will be lost and a good number of the country's Labour force will be gone too. This is why countries often suffer in terms of manpower.

War renders people and the economy miserable, it would be better to leave the country overpopulated than choose War as the only option. Wishing for pandemics, natural disasters and wars just to reduce the number of humans in the country shows no regards for humanity.

That's just stupid! War is a terrible thing that causes immense suffering and destruction. It's not a solution to any problem, let alone overpopulation. (Btw, who says overpopulation is even a problem?) Suggesting that war could somehow be a good thing is both ignorant and insensitive, imho.

The overpopulation that exists is local. There is no world overpopulation. If people worked together, the Earth could hold a hundred times more people.

Two simple things that could increase sustainability are:
1. Increase CO2, because it's the stuff that plants use to grow. More plants equals more food for animals and people.
2. Seasteading.

War shouldn't be used as the solution to overpopulation. The war in Ukraine and Russia has led to an unplanned sharp decline in population. After this war, they will have to seek diverse means to balance the population deficit. I hate the idea of using war to reduce population because my continent has a growing population and I wouldn't want to experience war around.

Come to think of it, is overpopulation a problem? The world has enough resources for all to survive. The problem is that few individuals and powerful nations just have more than they need. While weak nations are exploited and left to wallow in poverty.

Ukraine and Russia didn't had an overpopulation issue. Infact both countries were already in a path to decreasing population.
The overall trend of human population growth have already slowed down. Almost all of civilized world now has a fertility rate of below 2.1 which is replacement rate i.e. their population is going to decrease soon.
This includes the top 3 countries with largest population namely India, China and United states. Even the Muslim majority nations now have fertility rates below 5 on average.

Covid19 did not do work
War can the hit list of putins new missiles locations are over populated a lot unproductive people too.
Who knows maybe Putin doing favoure for Western countries leaders coz they themselfes will be in safe bunkers.
But world needds balance balance of people balance of good and evil something too much not good too.