Topic: Wardrick account hacked---trust abuse resolution in sight (finally) - page 7. (Read 25324 times)

So you read my posts and the first thought you had was that you must attack me by attempting to dox me? and people asked me why I was leaving the forum

Post proof here pls.

Who confirmed the fake ban? I'm not trolling or anything, it's just that I asked before and nobody answered back with a confirmation from someone who has the ability to ban. Is that just being based on the fact Panthers wasn't banned because I doubt QS used the same IP across all of his accounts.

There are a couple of threads and many posts (trolling and sig spamming included) so I probably missed something here.

I removed Quickseller because he was acting to deceive people, and I can't, and won't, be a part of that (he wasn't banned) if I know about it. I don't think he had bad intentions, or is a bad person, just maybe didn't think it all the way through.

Escrowing for yourself...on the one hand if someone is using Quickseller as an escrow, then they are using him because they trust him, or at the very least because they think his reputation is worth more than what they are trading. Him being part of the trade doesn't change that, and it still provides the peace of mind that an escrow can provide.

On the other hand, an escrow is supposed to be an impartial mediator in the event of disputes, which would be very difficult to do when being part of the trade. Even if he knew or thought he wouldn't do anything wrong in the process of the transaction, disputes can still arise when neither party has done anything wrong. That and taking additional fees isn't really the right thing to do. It's probably something one should avoid.

I don't have a strong stance on tspacepilot's feedback, or turtlehurricane's. I probably wouldn't leave the negative feedback myself, but I don't strongly disagree with it either.

I understand what you wanted to say, but another valid question is:

Why Quickseller staged his fake ban? It was not necessary in my opinion, and for this reason I can't trust him.

He wouldn't need to access the "escrow code", the private keys to the funds are in/on the JD servers (or are offline in doog's possession), so he could just take the money if that is what he decided to do

It would be nice if you guys could discuss Quickseller's self-escrow scheme over here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/quickseller-escrowing-for-himself-1171059

And leave this thread for QS and Wardrick (and others?) to work on explaining their motivations in using the trust system to damage my reputation.  QS has made his personal animus quite clear using several accounts now (see the post histories of ACCTSeller, Panthers52, FunFunnyFan and of course QS).  It's unclear what Wardrick's motivation is here.  So far he's just shouted a bit about how he thinks I'm an unscientific guy.  Okay.  But is everyone who thinks I'm "unscientific" supposted to leave me a negative rating in the spirit of TradeFortress?  Or is there something more here than just more bullies vs. tspacepilot on bitcointalk?

He wouldn't need to access the "escrow code", the private keys to the funds are in/on the JD servers (or are offline in doog's possession), so he could just take the money if that is what he decided to do

You are kidding right? First of all I specifically said that I would not be around.

You yourself said that you have acted as escrow for yourself (via JD escrow), so you really can't say that part is a scam.
There was never any kind of disputes, so you can't really say that I incorrectly mediated a dispute in my favor. In fact, I can say that for all disputes I have ever handled as escrow, it was extremely clear cut as to which side was in the right from the very beginning - I would go through the motions of asking both sides for evidence, soliciting any counterpoints to evidence provided (and obviously not telling either side that I believed them) - and nothing really changed except for the amount of evidence I was in possession of. There is the issue of the fee, however refunds were offered, and processed in the single case of a request, so there is no money lost, although I did explain here how having my trading partner pay the fee (when the escrow charges a fee as I do) is the most fair way to handle the trade. An intelligent trader is not going to care where his money goes, all he will care about is how much money goes in his pocket after selling his widget.

If it is not a scam, and someone who is on your trust list leaves a negative trust rating, then why would you leave them on your trust list after they leave such rating?
No.

doog did already confirm that he uses himself as escrow when on JD.
but he got a point with saying that anybody should know thats him owning jd: thats not the case with QS and TC. they didnt tell the other part that they are essentially sending first beforehand.