It's nice to see that the
BRC-20 developer himself, Domodata is now recommending openly
Taproot assets (formerly known as
Taro), a much better and more modern protocol, to create fungible tokens on Bitcoin:
Nice one OP, Twitter is now hyping the hell out of BRC-20 on the platform and many people are still buying those Ordinals, I know that this won't last very long, there will come a time where Ordinals will stop trending.
Yep, BRC-20 is already a bit downtrending in
blockchain space. Albeit the hype isn't over yet, around 200K transactions per day are probably still of this kind. (I dunno if my humble thread here has contributed a bit).
My concern is the devs on Bitcoin, they are still there I believe, why cant they put an end to this before millions of dollars went into Ordinals?
Why should they care? The devs should care about the core protocol, not about an experiment with an experimental "protocol extension". They could issue a statement, but I guess there are diverging opinions on how "good" or "bad" Ordinals/BRC-20 is for Bitcoin. And I think they know: people learn best by losing money.
If things really don't normalize in a couple of weeks (fees are already in an acceptable range again), then I guess a "standardness" policy change via
policy.cpp is the best way to go. A softfork crippling Taproot would be an extreme measure.
By the way: they've
discussed it, but the only one (among the devs, not the occasional mailing list visitors!) pressuring for action is Luke Dashjr, who's known for his a bit eccentric nature.
BTW: I'm a bit annoyed that this thread was moved into Altcoin Discussion. BRC-20 is a Bitcoin technology, and this post was intended to warn beginners. But whatever ...