Topic: [WARNING] WitLink - Fake Team (Read 553 times)

You only have yourself to blame. The information containing all the red flags about the now turned scam project was here for over a year. All you had to do was just hit the search button

I do hope you didn't lose a fortune to the scammers in the name of NFTs.

I haven't hear anything about witland or I don't know if that really exist. I can't found any information of them in the internet, 600+ Ethereum pool is pretty large enough for people to make them trust so We should expect that they should have atleast a website or whitepaper over the internet. Could you provide us a necessary information about it?

Omg Why i didn't check this thread before 
They ( Witlink ) did another big scam using an nft base project ( witland ) and yesterday they scape with a large sum of 600+ Ethereum of liquidity pool 

I just noticed that you addressed me personally here.

I'm sorry, but where did I say BDAM was a scam, you moron? True, as other members have pointed out, it's full of shit, just like you, but I never said it's a scam.

As I previously said, your name and photo are being used to advertise this dubious WitLink project, as in a number of other failed projects. If this is defamation, feel free to sue me.

Crypto rent-a-advisors is another tragicomic story..I planned for a long time to make topic about those leeches that are ready to "advise" and sell their name for a couple of bucks but somehow never wrote it.  And worst of all, they usually don't have any repercussions, they just go from one project to another, selling their name so scammy projects looks more legit. Some of those specimens are also on BDAM advisory board.



I saw those two weasels ( Martin Ploom and Frederik Lund) on bunch of scammy projects and honestly when I see them, in my mind there is immediately something wrong with the project. BDAM is no exception, if they ever vetted those two and projects they "advised" they wouldn't touch them with a ten foot pole.

I agree with you on that, and I 100% respect you guys trying to clean up the market and set standards. The market has been tough but we have persisted and there have been bumps on the road,  we have gotten burnt many times, but we have kept it moving forward and also are looking into how to dive into the NFT space, and just to be clear, we haven't taken a dime from outside investment and we have been self funded.

---

Fair enough, I guess that could have happened.

Problem is, exactly the same excuse has been used so many times before by a bunch of scam projects each and every time they got caught for something; whether it was incompetent team member who forgot to include reference links in the whitepaper, or simply lazy developer who used placeholder images for team members. Point is, it was always someone else's fault so even if on some odd ocassion that's really the case and project didn't intend to scam anyone but were victims themselves, no one on this forum will believe it (including me).

Care to explain in which capacity BDAM partnered with Amazon, IBM, Google Microsoft, Samsung and other top tier companies that you mentioned as your "strategic partners"? About all those people sending their support videos that you shared on your website, all of them are selling those on platform made exactly for that, Cameo. Coincidence? I think not!

It's interesting to notice that neither of those two things are available on your website anymore  

Aquaintel had Hilton Chairman Rick Hilton, ex Apple Executive Chuck goldman on advisory board with me and it failed? so Rick Hilton of Hilton Hotels and Chuck Goldman are scammers too? idiots..

I never endorsed or even knew of any project such as witlink also the rest of what I said is no mumbo jumbo its facts.. and yeah im not impressing anyone especially a person trying to push opinons as facts from their basement. Don't flatter your self. I'm done here I said what I said.  0 Association with witlink. Never even knew it existed.

This is exactly my point, every single one of the strat-ups you were assigned as an advisor has failed, but you have failed to advise investors about that. Since nobody is forcibly appointing you to them it simply means you've bet on the loser team five times in a row, so why would that change now?


You're free to open a reputation topic on your exchange coin project whatever that is and defend it there and tell us how facts are opinion, not facts.
If indeed you are the man you claim to be and if indeed this project is using your name without your consent you can divert your energy on making that known in public and prevent others from falling into another scam.

As for the rest of your mumbo jumbo, I couldn't care less.
And an INNER city business with a revenue of 1 million a year is not going to impress anyone on this forum.

@Rikafip
Just lol...

BDAM is full of shit. They lied about partnerships, hired people via Cameo platform for a few hundreds of bucks to pretend giving them support, and then after few of us started asking them tough questions to which they didn't have an answer to, they deleted the ANN content, locked it and ran away.

One post from their ANN was a spot on and explains perfectly the way BDAM operates

---

Neither of this proves legitimacy of BDAM.

First of all if you know anything about the start up world, start ups can fail.... second of all you think one advisor determines the success of a project? and not the team? or the market conditions? Advisory does not equate to success. Third of all the start ups I advised were largely in 2017-2018 when the market was down and a lot of start ups in the space failed because of the market dip and quite frankly teams which weren't willing to take advice and burnt through their private seed investments on development alone, to a point where they didn't have enough to even do a ICO or some cases enter the market. Lastly the idea that you think that during one of the most historic economically devastating events (pandemic) would not force a company to pivot to survive is hilarious and show cases you're lacking knowledge in entrepreneurship and business in general. When literally every business, big or small has pivoted why can't a company which is self funded mind it's own business and do what it needs to do to be competitive? Also BDAM is not a coin company, its a financial ecosystem. The coin was a small part but we decided to focus on building infrastructure and decentralization.  BDAM is completely self funded we didn't ask a dime from anyone. check yourself and come correct.

Don't throw your opinions around as facts and try to defame people without having any clue or context on the facts. I said it once and I will say it again I have nothing to do with this witlink garbage. I have never endorsed or posted anything about such a project. So stop the bullshit.



Just to be clear I appreciate you performing your civic duty to protect the community, I support that 100%. But I am not going to promote defamation of myself or my company on baseless claims If I didn't care I wouldn't comment but I do care and I am happy to have a conversation. So again if you don't know ASK, don't make up opinionated statements and push them as facts..

You have been involved as an advisor for 5 projects, there of them died without issuing any coins and two of them died in the ICO phase.
As for BDAM, anyone would call a scam a coin that doesn't exist and a team that alters its so-called roadmap every month:

https://web.archive.org/web/20200602214126/https://www.bdamcoin.com/

This is 100% incorrect and defamation. I am not involved or affiliated in any way to this project. So stop spreading BS. There are people using my picture without my consent. and BDAM is in no way a scam moron https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D27zhl7nEvk&ab_channel=bdamcoin

At least, one less project here that may screw some users.
I don't think this project will move forward. The "dev" may abandon this project and just create a new one.
They are still selling their tokens at a rate of $0.15 and currently there are 3 holders.
One is their address but seems that there are 2 buyers, or so it seems.
I hope users from the forum will not take their chance on this one.

Yes, I agree. All these images from their team are fake AI-generated images that can easily be detected by artefacts and distorted backgrounds.
I noticed Jaian Cuttari as their advisor who was involved in many scam and defunct projects. His photo, though extensively altered and mutilated for reasons unknown, is probably the only true one on the website.




source: https://www.bdam.co/

Reported to Cryptoscamalert
https://cryptoscamalert.com/crypto_scam_report/1224

@WitlinkAI, your excuse isn't valid. You have done an unprofessional job from your end and it isn't acceptable by the community. It's fine you had used a template but even you don't know that you should remove the dummy picture from the site? If there is a real team then how many minutes will take to replace that all? Isn't your excuse funny? Your platform is related to money, so definitely users will take a deep look there since they would join there. I don't believe in you.

Support the flag and left negative feedback as well.

That's interesting as i thought that scam projects steal people's pics from LinkedIn or social media and portrait them on their site as their team.

I never thought that these evil minded people are one step ahead in fooling people and making fake pics using AI which are difficult to identity.