Pages:
Author

Topic: ‘watered-down bitcoin’ for institutional investors (Read 1329 times)

legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
As soon as their investors understand bitcoin I think they will see that this service does nothing they could not have done themselves. Why not just buy some bitcoins then buy some T-bonds?


Storing btc securely is a value-add.
That's a good point. They are also insured, I assume. But if you understand the technology then you may consider unshared control of your private keys to be even more secure than trusting a third party. If you don't understand, then farming out security might be a worthwhile investment.

True.  Also institutional investors it starts getting more complex , you need multisig, who in the institution
Will hold the keys,etc...maybe better for them to use a financial holdings company.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
The fact that they split 50-50 is stupid. The fund only works for someone that wants to invest the same amount of money in BTC as they invest in treasuries. How many people will want to do that? Are they also going to provide the entire range of funds with mixes from 90-10 to 10-90?

Ah come on... Accept it for what it's worth and be grateful it's helping adoption. 
Should resse's peanut butter cups start offering different mix ratios of peanut butter and chocolate?  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 4522
Merit: 3426
The fact that they split 50-50 is stupid. The fund only works for someone that wants to invest the same amount of money in BTC as they invest in treasuries. How many people will want to do that? Are they also going to provide the entire range of funds with mixes from 90-10 to 10-90?
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147
The revolution will be monetized!
As soon as their investors understand bitcoin I think they will see that this service does nothing they could not have done themselves. Why not just buy some bitcoins then buy some T-bonds?


Storing btc securely is a value-add.
That's a good point. They are also insured, I assume. But if you understand the technology then you may consider unshared control of your private keys to be even more secure than trusting a third party. If you don't understand, then farming out security might be a worthwhile investment.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
As soon as their investors understand bitcoin I think they will see that this service does nothing they could not have done themselves. Why not just buy some bitcoins then buy some T-bonds?


Storing btc securely is a value-add.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147
The revolution will be monetized!
As soon as their investors understand bitcoin I think they will see that this service does nothing they could not have done themselves. Why not just buy some bitcoins then buy some T-bonds?
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
Great idea.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
it means that 50% of a huge amount of money flows into BTC

great news, good luck to the shorties  Cool

Im sure less than 1% of the mined bitcoins are short, there is not many means of doing so. 

well, many people are not really short but sold a la baisse, hoping they can buy back in lower

that will also lead to quite some squeeze if price goes up instead

That isn't a squeeze.  Squeeze's occur when people have no option but to cover a position to avoid a margin call.  People hoping to buy at lower prices just means prices will continue to trend down until there is an explicit reason to buy.
g4c
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
It's a stupid idea that only muppet clients would invest in. The better alternative to a 50-50 mix is to invest half the money and keep the other half in cash.

Keep the other half in silver rounds I would say.
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
What's the advantage of buying bitcoins and US treasuries through Pantera vs. buying them directly? Or investing in their bitcoin-only offering vs. just buying bitcoins off an exchange?

because pantera are tying them up with an imaginary bow, and lots of imaginary glitter, then charging a premium. the same is said for expensive restaurants. why pay over $100 for a bit of lettuce and a carrot.. "its the service and experience you are paying for"
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
It's a stupid idea that only muppet clients would invest in. The better alternative to a 50-50 mix is to invest half the money and keep the other half in cash.
Some early adopters developed a portfolio consisting of bitcoins, hookers, and blow.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
What's the advantage of buying bitcoins and US treasuries through Pantera vs. buying them directly? Or investing in their bitcoin-only offering vs. just buying bitcoins off an exchange?
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
copper member
Activity: 1380
Merit: 504
THINK IT, BUILD IT, PLAY IT! --- XAYA
One way or another, half of that portfolio is going to zero. Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1014
it means that 50% of a huge amount of money flows into BTC

great news, good luck to the shorties  Cool

Im sure less than 1% of the mined bitcoins are short, there is not many means of doing so. 

well, many people are not really short but sold a la baisse, hoping they can buy back in lower

that will also lead to quite some squeeze if price goes up instead
sr. member
Activity: 469
Merit: 253
The volatility in bitcoin is sometimes more than 200%, said Pantera Capital Management Chief Executive Dan Morehead.

To offset that volatility, Pantera has an offering that gives its investors a 50-50 mix of bitcoin and U.S. Treasurys, he said at the Inside Bitcoins conference in New York on Tuesday.

http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2014/04/08/watered-down-bitcoin-for-institutional-investors/



Curious ... are institutional investors so incompetent that they don't know how to manage a portfolio of assets with different risk profiles? If they find a specific asset more volatile, can they not simply reduce their exposure? (e.g. buy 50% as much!)

I'm sure a lot of the hedge fund types are mostly looking for optionality. For example buying premium with long expiries, or going long vol. There is almost nothing like that out there, certainly not with any liquidity.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
it means that 50% of a huge amount of money flows into BTC

great news, good luck to the shorties  Cool

Im sure less than 1% of the mined bitcoins are short, there is not many means of doing so. 
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1014
it means that 50% of a huge amount of money flows into BTC

great news, good luck to the shorties  Cool
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
But treasuries pay better than cash.

i like tax free muni bonds better
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1132
But treasuries pay better than cash.
Pages:
Jump to: