Topic: Waves platform and ICOs - page 2. (Read 781 times)
I can not say anything bad about the waves yet. Today there was a wallet registered there. No problems have arisen yet.
I'm having trouble understanding how Waves can be considered a trusted and reliable ICO facilitator, having partnerships with notable institutions such as Deloitte and Gazprombank, when they don't even have a public listing of a physical address, phone or email.
I guess they have other communication channel. The relatively few forum entries on their site
Are you talking about https://wavestalk.org/? Few forum entries? It has 1198 Members, 2210 Posts and 433 Topics. That is not few!the forum registration mechanism itself appears to be broken (tried 4 times to resend my confirmation, nothing).
Why do you want to register to the forum when you say:screams scam to me
Is it really normal at this stage for a company already facilitating millions in investment vehicles, and hopes to be a leader in this market, to be this dysfunctional?
Don’t forget: Waves is still in beta stageTell me about other Cryptoprojects who makes it better. Waves can learn from them.
I'm having trouble understanding how Waves can be considered a trusted and reliable ICO facilitator, having partnerships with notable institutions such as Deloitte and Gazprombank, when they don't even have a public listing of a physical address, phone or email. The relatively few forum entries on their site list wallet and transaction errors, and the forum registration mechanism itself appears to be broken (tried 4 times to resend my confirmation, nothing). The overall quality of the site and content screams scam to me, despite wanting to believe they are legitimate.
Is it really normal at this stage for a company already facilitating millions in investment vehicles, and hopes to be a leader in this market, to be this dysfunctional?
Is it really normal at this stage for a company already facilitating millions in investment vehicles, and hopes to be a leader in this market, to be this dysfunctional?
Jump to: