Author

Topic: WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform. - page 1439. (Read 2389394 times)

hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 513
Man, it's a mess. It looks like so many people whining over not getting enough free stuff, but on the other hand, there are way more people NOT complaining. Too bad you don't get to see or hear from them.
I don't think it's possible to create a bounty system, that doesn't piss off at least a few people.

I, for one, received all my bounties in the appropiate amount. All fine Smiley

Maybe the day after tomorrow everybody has calmed down enough to discuss other things than bounties?
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
By the looks of things and with everyone fucking out about bounties, I think its fair to say this coin is gonna be bad ass! Moon waves! Lol.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 251
Guys, those who did not receive bouties for Newslatter please contact with @ahmedashraf or @wavesplatform in Waves slack channel

Waves slack channel - http://wavesplatform-slack.herokuapp.com for registration without invite or https://wavesplatform.slack.com/

Those who have used different emails, admins already waiting in the chat room, participants definitely get their payment.

All undistributed(unclaimed bounties) will be added to post-ICO bounties pool. All details will be announced later.


 Smiley  Wink  Cheesy
Fair enough but i suggest if these waves not claimed within 1-2 months should be distributed among those who keep wave signature for 1-4 months as a new stakes with new rules.
Thank you

Good offer, I'll keep that in mind.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 500
Guys, those who did not receive bouties for Newslatter please contact with @ahmedashraf or @wavesplatform in Waves slack channel

Waves slack channel - http://wavesplatform-slack.herokuapp.com for registration without invite or https://wavesplatform.slack.com/

Those who have used different emails, admins already waiting in the chat room, participants definitely get their payment.

All undistributed(unclaimed bounties) will be added to post-ICO bounties pool. All details will be announced later.


 Smiley  Wink  Cheesy
Fair enough but i suggest if these waves not claimed within 1-2 months should be distributed among those who keep wave signature for 1-4 months as a new stakes with new rules.
Thank you
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 250
Quite obviously that Waves management should just ask the bots and noobs to fuckoff. This isn't charity
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000

RISE my friend... but no spam on other board threads, out of respect of the developers.

I don't take kindly to people trying to blackmail me. 

Spam here with BS all you like - I can't stop you.

It will not stop me from giving my opinion on shitcoins which are trying to con people out of their money.  If you go round encouraging others to invest in the same shit then you are just as complicit in the scam.

Really I am very disappointed in your behaviour.
legendary
Activity: 986
Merit: 1001
I've made my point. I will stop this topic. For me the way how it was handled was done by children. But i hold a big amount of BTCs in Waves so... i hope that their development skills are a lot better then what they have show so far.

Damn placebo you always creating controversy, stop crying with useless post, some guys have more than 5 or 6 emails, what if that guys registered all their email accounts on waves plattform, you can avoid Ip with Firefox and Foxy Proxy. Damn a kid with 12 yo can do that.

Stop complaining and whining, Waves team cant post the list of the emails of newsletter campaign participants, thats a personal info of us. Is dangerous, so stop asking for that.

Some of us know your gray past and you are not totally honest.  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
I've made my point. I will stop this topic. For me the way how it was handled was done by children. But i hold a big amount of BTCs in Waves so... i hope that their development skills are a lot better then what they have show so far.

Actually no point was made.  It was just non-sensical alarmist gibberish.  Perhaps you would prefer WAVES to be more like DL(i)sk or whatever the hell it is called?

RISE my friend... but no spam on other board threads, out of respect of the developers.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 251
Why i cant login with my autherization code?

Check the time zone. Check the time on your smartphone, try to use a different browser.
I think the problem was i am not conecting my phone on the internet.

Now do you get access to your account? Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1240
Merit: 1001
Thank God I'm an atheist
I think it is obvious that many more people got newsletter bonus than any other bonus.

Giving an email address is less privacy concerning than a Facebook like.

No surprise that the people who got only this bonus is so high.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
I've made my point. I will stop this topic. For me the way how it was handled was done by children. But i hold a big amount of BTCs in Waves so... i hope that their development skills are a lot better then what they have show so far.

Actually no point was made.  It was just non-sensical alarmist gibberish.  Perhaps you would prefer WAVES to be more like DL(i)sk or whatever the hell it is called?
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 500
Why i cant login with my autherization code?

Check the time zone. Check the time on your smartphone, try to use a different browser.
I think the problem was i am not conecting my phone on the internet.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
I've made my point. I will stop this topic. For me the way how it was handled was done by children. But i hold a big amount of BTCs in Waves so... i hope that their development skills are a lot better then what they have show so far.

I feel like anyone who makes a claim like this while renting your signature out to a project like RISE must be full of it. Not to mention you've made similar type posts in this thread before. C'mon, who are you expecting to fool? The last like 20 pages of this thread is people moaning that they didn't get their free coins. There's no pleasing everyone, people will always find something to complain about  Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Received news letter bounties. Appreciated  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
I've made my point. I will stop this topic. For me the way how it was handled was done by children. But i hold a big amount of BTCs in Waves so... i hope that their development skills are a lot better then what they have show so far.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Sasha should release a google doc so that everybody can see who was there... they can remove the last characters of the mail addresses or so. It should be a 5 minute task. Everything is stored in a database so run a replace command, change the first 5 characters in XXXXX and show us that 8000 user list.

8000 subscribed probably with bots but they didn`t create accounts on the ICO site so it will be added to post-ICO bounties pool. There is only 3233 members those who created account on the ICO site with the same email.

Dev team reserve the rest from that 5000 additionally subscribed accounts as someone can contact still, if noone contacts undistributed ones go to post-ICO pool


From Dm's with @MX
sounds like a very reasonable way of going about it.
also received newsletter bounty  Smiley
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
I'm pretty sure that a lot of cheating has happened because of the terrible way how the bounties were run.

Don't get me wrong, i like Waves, i have invested several BTCs in Waves, but management sucks.

That's just not true.  The management is infinitely better than most other ICOs I can think of.  Anyway there is no 100% way of avoiding cheating.

Yes, there is.

Using BCT and user must exist before ICO started. then the cheating will be 0.0001%, maybe you have a few people that has 2 accounts on BCT... but then you could have added another rule that the account most have a number of posts just one month before ICO. Result of cheating. 0.0000001%

That is how you do it, and that is how it should be done. I hope they will think of smarter rules for the Post-ICO then the current ones...

Soooo anyone who joined BCT because of the Waves ICO would be excluded. Also keep in mind some people don't use BCT for obvious scam/spam reasons. I'm sorry but that's a terrible idea.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
Yes, there is.

Using BCT and user must exist before ICO started. then the cheating will be 0.0001%, maybe you have a few people that has 2 accounts on BCT... but then you could have added another rule that the account most have a number of posts just one month before ICO. Result of cheating. 0.0000001%

That is how you do it, and that is how it should be done. I hope they will think of smarter rules for the Post-ICO then the current ones...

Actually your solution has the same problems so solves nothing.  Many people have shill accounts on BTC it is no different from fake twitter/FB accounts or multiple email addresses.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 251
That is my .... point!!!! They said, you need the same address as on the ICO site... so the reward should have been split over those 3233 members!!! and should not go to any post-ico pool or so... That 3233 nember that sounds right!!!!

So if Waves want to be correct then only those 3233 members should receive their 61.86 Waves coins!!!

Please stop to create a scandal. Nevertheless, they have received about 8,000 participants with probably bots. Participants with different addresses can also get the bounty. Of course if they are registered before ICO end.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
That is my .... point!!!! They said, you need the same address as on the ICO site... so the reward should have been split over those 3233 members!!! and should not go to any post-ico pool or so... That 3233 nember that sounds right!!!!

So if Waves want to be correct then only those 3233 members should receive their 61.86 Waves coins!!!

That is incorrect.  They did not originally specify that you needed the same e-mail address so in order to be fair they are allowing people to still receive their bounties if they didn't.  There is no way for them to know how many of those extra people are bots or are genuine people so they have to reserve the funds.  It is quite obvious and straightforward.  If they didn't do it this way people would complain about it being unfair.
Jump to: