Topic: WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform. - page 2068. (Read 2389392 times)

Quote from: Breasal on April 07, 2016, 05:37:22 AM

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

I think you are asking in wrong thread

vanbreuk (sprnt) BOT [9:00 PM]

[9:01]
Multigateway (or an equivalent development over Waves) would require coding work to be adapted for Waves, it's not a matter of server configuration only since the Nxt API is deeply ingrained in it. But of course a Waves MGW is an interesting idea to consider.

Well the OP mentioned that the MGW idea would be used. I guess this means a new codebase for the MGW will be coded from scratch for waves?

Two options - MGW can be configured/modified for Waves what would enable influx of other cryptos into system or equivalent development will follow

Thanks mxxxxxx.

One final Q: will Coinbase be okay to send BTC for ICO or will a signable wallet be required?

yes, 2 out of 3 multisig from Coinbase.
I'll update the ann soon.

kalgecin

hero member

Activity: 819

Merit: 1000

For the signature campaign how do we actually get the coins after please?
Thanks

mxxxxxx

legendary

Activity: 2310

Merit: 1000

Quote from: mxxxxxx on April 07, 2016, 05:34:39 AM

Quote from: mxxxxxx on April 07, 2016, 05:34:39 AM

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

I think you are asking in wrong thread

vanbreuk (sprnt) BOT [9:00 PM]

[9:01]
Multigateway (or an equivalent development over Waves) would require coding work to be adapted for Waves, it's not a matter of server configuration only since the Nxt API is deeply ingrained in it. But of course a Waves MGW is an interesting idea to consider.

Well the OP mentioned that the MGW idea would be used. I guess this means a new codebase for the MGW will be coded from scratch for waves?

Two options - MGW can be configured/modified for Waves what would enable influx of other cryptos into system or equivalent development will follow

Thanks mxxxxxx.

One final Q: will Coinbase be okay to send BTC for ICO or will a signable wallet be required?

What i can tell for now is that every of 3 partners will hold a key and one of those partners wallet is to be used. It will depend from which partner runs the wallet

We will include the answer in the announcement, still finalizing details about it

Breasal

hero member

Activity: 585

Merit: 500

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

I think you are asking in wrong thread

vanbreuk (sprnt) BOT [9:00 PM]

[9:01]
Multigateway (or an equivalent development over Waves) would require coding work to be adapted for Waves, it's not a matter of server configuration only since the Nxt API is deeply ingrained in it. But of course a Waves MGW is an interesting idea to consider.

Well the OP mentioned that the MGW idea would be used. I guess this means a new codebase for the MGW will be coded from scratch for waves?

Two options - MGW can be configured/modified for Waves what would enable influx of other cryptos into system or equivalent development will follow

Thanks mxxxxxx.

One final Q: will Coinbase be okay to send BTC for ICO or will a signable wallet be required?

kalgecin

hero member

Activity: 819

Merit: 1000

This is my first post I have joined this awesome sig campaign. How do we get the money afterwards?

Thanks

mxxxxxx

legendary

Activity: 2310

Merit: 1000

Quote from: sasha35625 on April 07, 2016, 05:30:16 AM

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

I think you are asking in wrong thread

vanbreuk (sprnt) BOT [9:00 PM]

[9:01]
Multigateway (or an equivalent development over Waves) would require coding work to be adapted for Waves, it's not a matter of server configuration only since the Nxt API is deeply ingrained in it. But of course a Waves MGW is an interesting idea to consider.

Well the OP mentioned that the MGW idea would be used. I guess this means a new codebase for the MGW will be coded from scratch for waves?

Two options - MGW can be configured/modified for Waves what would enable influx of other cryptos into system or equivalent development will follow

Breasal

hero member

Activity: 585

Merit: 500

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

MGW is working fine actually now
we have on our team the admin who supports it at the moment
actually the software is not so complicated, we'll make it work perfectly.

nothing is perfect. But an improvement over MGW would suffice, I guess.

Breasal

hero member

Activity: 585

Merit: 500

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

I think you are asking in wrong thread

vanbreuk (sprnt) BOT [9:00 PM]

[9:01]
Multigateway (or an equivalent development over Waves) would require coding work to be adapted for Waves, it's not a matter of server configuration only since the Nxt API is deeply ingrained in it. But of course a Waves MGW is an interesting idea to consider.

Well the OP mentioned that the MGW idea would be used. I guess this means a new codebase for the MGW will be coded from scratch for waves?

sasha35625

hero member

Activity: 589

Merit: 507

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

MGW is working fine actually now
we have on our team the admin who supports it at the moment
actually the software is not so complicated, we'll make it work perfectly.

mxxxxxx

legendary

Activity: 2310

Merit: 1000