Author

Topic: WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform. - page 2103. (Read 2389392 times)

hero member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 526
Signature Campaign Details.

I would like to request all the signature campaign participants to register their information in the following form to be eligible for a payout from the bounty pool once the ICO concludes:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1aCjm9sekB3wBRYB_iCvwgUi0QPP9TfJwEz9mlqS5er8/viewform

full member
Activity: 213
Merit: 101
From my understanding the 50 post are to be anywhere on the forum and not specifically limited to this thread. The goal is to inform people on other threads of the existance of Waves.

It's pointless to write a non-relevant post here in the Waves official thread, in order to get stakes with the WAVES signature because if you are on this thread then obviously you know about Waves and it kill the marketing objective.

I see the 50 posts as an icentive for people to post in other threads and give visibility to the Waves project in order to attract more potential investors.
If there is to be pointless "for the stakes" posts on this thread, I'd suggest to get this thread moderated to get rid of those posts.

sr. member
Activity: 302
Merit: 250
Sorry this is not true, because LISK don't have signature campaign already.
[/quote]

They did have a signature campaign and it's over now. It ended the other day. Which day I can't remember but i'm sure you can find out if you read through 300+ pages of BS. There's no other reason a thread should have that many post in it because the real information probably is only about 50 pages or so which a person can easily catch up and stay upto date fairly easily.


Edit: Think of it this way. If there's 1000 people following the thread in the signature campaign at 50 post minimum each. That's 5000 post just by those people alone. I can't tell you how many "to the moon" "to Mars" etc... post i've read in there just so people can get there post count up.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000

Can you clarify the below please?
2) All members need to post at least 50 posts by the time the ICO ends to be eligible for a reward. This means that members participating today have 9 weeks to meet the criteria, while last week ones have only one week.

Does it mean we have to post at least 50 times in this thread alone?

as I read we need 50 post/week. no?

No, 50 posts from registration to the end of ico (9 weeks).


Guys, why do you want to flood BTCTalk with useless messages with this policy? It's really annoying to read hundreds of messages like "me too", "great", "to the moon" and such - just because people want to post 50 times during your campaign. Please re-consider. It's kind of unprofessional. I'm here since 2013 and we have 1000s more useless messages today than then... Don't make BTT worse that it deserves. Thank you.
Totally agree.Everyday I see pages of replies with no real content and I have stopped reading them all now.

Dev, could you please react to our opinion? What is the reasoning behind this "minimum 50 posts" thing?


It's for spreading FUD and destrying a perfectly good and infomative thread.
See the LISK thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1346646.6860  for and an example of this kind of behavior.
10-15 pages a day of nonsense BS. It's hard to keep up  with real things developing in that thread because there's so much BS in it.
It takes a lot of time to catch up and and your still not anymore informed than before you started reading it because of all the nonsense in it.

Sorry this is not true, because LISK don't have signature campaign already.
sr. member
Activity: 302
Merit: 250

Can you clarify the below please?
2) All members need to post at least 50 posts by the time the ICO ends to be eligible for a reward. This means that members participating today have 9 weeks to meet the criteria, while last week ones have only one week.

Does it mean we have to post at least 50 times in this thread alone?

as I read we need 50 post/week. no?

No, 50 posts from registration to the end of ico (9 weeks).


Guys, why do you want to flood BTCTalk with useless messages with this policy? It's really annoying to read hundreds of messages like "me too", "great", "to the moon" and such - just because people want to post 50 times during your campaign. Please re-consider. It's kind of unprofessional. I'm here since 2013 and we have 1000s more useless messages today than then... Don't make BTT worse that it deserves. Thank you.
Totally agree.Everyday I see pages of replies with no real content and I have stopped reading them all now.

Dev, could you please react to our opinion? What is the reasoning behind this "minimum 50 posts" thing?


It's for spreading FUD and destrying a perfectly good and infomative thread.
See the LISK thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1346646.6860  for and an example of this kind of behavior.
10-15 pages a day of nonsense BS. It's hard to keep up  with real things developing in that thread because there's so much BS in it.
It takes a lot of time to catch up and and your still not anymore informed than before you started reading it because of all the nonsense in it.
sr. member
Activity: 357
Merit: 251

Can you clarify the below please?
2) All members need to post at least 50 posts by the time the ICO ends to be eligible for a reward. This means that members participating today have 9 weeks to meet the criteria, while last week ones have only one week.

Does it mean we have to post at least 50 times in this thread alone?

as I read we need 50 post/week. no?

No, 50 posts from registration to the end of ico (9 weeks).


Guys, why do you want to flood BTCTalk with useless messages with this policy? It's really annoying to read hundreds of messages like "me too", "great", "to the moon" and such - just because people want to post 50 times during your campaign. Please re-consider. It's kind of unprofessional. I'm here since 2013 and we have 1000s more useless messages today than then... Don't make BTT worse that it deserves. Thank you.
Totally agree.Everyday I see pages of replies with no real content and I have stopped reading them all now.

Dev, could you please react to our opinion? What is the reasoning behind this "minimum 50 posts" thing?

Hello

The signature campaign is could be thought of as a banner advertising one. In order for a user to get a share of the bounty pool, it is only logical to make sure that he has contributed through some length to the outreach of the campaign, and it is illogical to reward users for placing the code in their signature area when they haven't helped in spreading the word.

Moreover, 50 posts over a period of 9 weeks (63 days!) requires the user to only post once daily. As such, I don't see why this will put pressure on users to contribute with "filler" posts when it very possible to post a constructive ones once a day.

The issue of filler posts isn't one this campaign will effect greatly, as we aren't a pay-per-post campaign. As such, users are not tempted to post a ton of useless posts daily in order to gain more coins.
hero member
Activity: 762
Merit: 500
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100

Can you clarify the below please?
2) All members need to post at least 50 posts by the time the ICO ends to be eligible for a reward. This means that members participating today have 9 weeks to meet the criteria, while last week ones have only one week.

Does it mean we have to post at least 50 times in this thread alone?

as I read we need 50 post/week. no?

No, 50 posts from registration to the end of ico (9 weeks).


Guys, why do you want to flood BTCTalk with useless messages with this policy? It's really annoying to read hundreds of messages like "me too", "great", "to the moon" and such - just because people want to post 50 times during your campaign. Please re-consider. It's kind of unprofessional. I'm here since 2013 and we have 1000s more useless messages today than then... Don't make BTT worse that it deserves. Thank you.
Totally agree.Everyday I see pages of replies with no real content and I have stopped reading them all now.

Dev, could you please react to our opinion? What is the reasoning behind this "minimum 50 posts" thing?
sr. member
Activity: 243
Merit: 250
Will waves use DPOS, like LISK?
full member
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
Signature added
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1001
www.neutroncoin.com
Signature added.
sr. member
Activity: 367
Merit: 250
Tomorrow we`ll have our first Newsletter!

Subscribe here -> http://wavesplatform.com/
full member
Activity: 213
Merit: 101
ICO for WAVES is started?
How many minimum to participated of ICO?

There is no minimum contribution but the size of your investment will define the number of WAVES you will receive at the end of the ICO.

Ex : in the scenario where you invest 1 btc and a total of 100 btc is raised during the ICO, you will get 1% [ 1(your investment) /100(total)] of the total ICO'ed supply (85M waves)
full member
Activity: 200
Merit: 250
Read first page, ICO start April, 12
sr. member
Activity: 729
Merit: 250
ICO for WAVES is started?
How many minimum to participated of ICO?
hero member
Activity: 802
Merit: 501
Edit: mods are deleting all my translated post due to incorrect thread placement. We are searching a solution, but the Hungarian translation is ready.
sr. member
Activity: 372
Merit: 250
 Signature added.
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
Wavers, maybe someone can create cool slogan for Waves? )
What do you think?

#makesomewaves


Waves for it...
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
nice, watching and applying for signature campaign. on my watch list.  Cool GL
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
What good could the WAVES platform serve?

Crypto-assets, whose issuance, transfer and trading will be made easier than ever by the WAVES platform, could have many benefits with unprecedented flexibility, but let us focus on a case example here. Assume you want to open an exchange. What does an exchange look like? Like this, for instance: https://www.bitfinex.com. And what does it do? It allows users to deposit and withdraw money, and with that money, the users are able to trade certain financial instruments. Thus, an exchange is responsible for two things:

1) Assuring that the users' money is fully backed up, not stolen, not accessed by anyone else than the users themselves.

2) Matching "buy" and "sell" orders to allow trading.

For the second purpose, the exchange will need a software which is called a trading platform framework. The exchange, then, either needs a developer team to code the software or it has to buy one. Writing a fully functional trading platform is not an easy work, but writing a SECURE trading platform is even harder. Amid the hackers who are ready to attack the system, the exchange would be left sleepless in the best scenario. 2-factor-authenticators, high advanced anti-spam filters and many more are necessary to secure such a system, and still one should hope for the best. Remember what happened to Mt.Gox, and that will be more than enough as an example. The second option is to buy a trading platform such as this one: http://www.modulusglobal.com/products/trading-platforms. If you think they're selling this for less than $30K, you're wrong. So well, among all things, you need to spend more than 30 grands for the trading platform.

On the other hand, there is a completely free a provably secure version of this platform: WAVES. With WAVES, you will only need to issue your crypto-assets in the platform so as to make them available for trading. You may also issue your own USD-token for your customers. So, this will enable you to focus on the first purpose, which is to assure that the users' money is there. And the WAVES platform has an advantage with that, too. If you want to open a traditional exchange, the users' money will be stored in their online accounts as e-money. How about hackers? Well, those hackers will inevitably attack their accounts to steal the funds. That happened many times, and sometimes even the exchange itself was blamed to steal the funds; BTC-e is an example. With WAVES, on the other hand, the e-money, that is, the crypto-USD, will be held in the customers' decentralized wallet with provably higher security than any existing centralized system.

All in all, with WAVES, the exchange may focus on the market making process and evade all the unnecessary problems which it would have to deal with in the case of the centralized scenario. Not only could the WAVES platform reduce the starting costs of an exchange, but also it provides built-in security and functionality.

This is just one example among the innumerable use cases of the WAVES platform.
Jump to: