People can literally launch millions of tokens, there is nothing unique about that with a 1 Waves fee
if you could limit the tokens count, like only 3000 tokens could be created in total, then those 3000 tokens could be appreciated, but since we're in an open source world, someone else could create a platform like Waves with no limit.
Can someone tell me what is the difference between Waves and all other platforms like it? is the Counterparty also like Waves? is ETH also like Waves?
Who is funding the Miner reward token?
Why did you launch the platform while it's only half complete? there are some features and functions missing, are we going to see a rise after they're finished and ready for work? can I at least buy myself a lambo this time please?
I don't really see the thought process/reasoning behind limiting the number of tokens on Waves. The goal of Waves as a platform essentially is to get as many projects as possible to use it in order to increase the transaction volume and with that transaction fees.
Waves is coded from scratch and written in Scala - no other platform is, at least not that I know of. Counterparty relies on the Bitcoin blockchain and inherited Bitcoin's 'weaknesses' such as 10 minute block time. ETH is different as its main application is smart contracts paired with tokens. However, ETH is much more difficult to use which gives Waves a certain advantage. I could go on and on about the differences but you might want to check that out yourself.
The Miner Reward Token is distributed by Waves Platform itself. There is no funding needed for MRT.
Have you ever seen a crypto which only launched when its feature set is complete?
