Waves is one of my favourite picks for 2017. But I do not want to give any investment advices. Otherwise. it looks very promising if you take into account all the functions of their Lite client.
Does someone remembers the early days of PayPal? For long term Waves looks very similar and even much better.
Topic: WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform. - page 445. (Read 2389197 times)
Waves Blockchain Platform Introduces New Framework For Community-Based Ratings Organizations
https://www.thestreet.com/story/13945557/1/waves-blockchain-platform-introduces-new-framework-for-community-based-ratings-organizations.html
https://www.thestreet.com/story/13945557/1/waves-blockchain-platform-introduces-new-framework-for-community-based-ratings-organizations.html
Waves is looking prime for re-entry. Not a bad start for 2017 and a bright future ahead.
Very overvalued, almost no functions, delays follow delays. Dex will be not ready for sure at the end of january. Its not coming before summmer.
The price will go for sure more down.
Waves doesn't impress me. It looks more and more like crap with absolutely no backing. I have no idea why people view it as a blockchain parlor which produces unique business solutions for improving existing tools. Though if u compare it with LISK the latter will be in a higher position on the scale of shittiness than waves.
while the blockchain aspect of it doesn't provide anything unique, if the company itself can provide a proper fiat gateway allowing us to trade a properly pegged asset that can be swapped 1:1 for fiat currencies, this will be a good step forward. i'm not talking about those bullshit pegs like bitshares's bitusd or bitcny which recently got delisted from polo, lmao
Waves is looking prime for re-entry. Not a bad start for 2017 and a bright future ahead.
Very overvalued, almost no functions, delays follow delays. Dex will be not ready for sure at the end of january. Its not coming before summmer.
The price will go for sure more down.
Waves doesn't impress me. It looks more and more like crap with absolutely no backing. I have no idea why people view it as a blockchain parlor which produces unique business solutions for improving existing tools. Though if u compare it with LISK the latter will be in a higher position on the scale of shittiness than waves.
The problem of waves is that the ICO was overbought. That problem is solved over time. When they've sold all weak hands.
Waves is a great project. I'm convinced of his success.
Waves is a great project. I'm convinced of his success.
Yes, overbought a bit, if they only raised 10k btc or 5k btc, people would be never crying about the sub ico price, they could earn profit.
The problem of waves is that the ICO was overbought. That problem is solved over time. When they've sold all weak hands.
Waves is a great project. I'm convinced of his success.
Waves is a great project. I'm convinced of his success.
Stratis hasn't needed Polo to make an X9 from the ICO. Since it was added to Polo, it has only lowered the price.
Just a note. That Poloniex adds Waves is good, but it's not that important.
Maybe waves without poloniex is better, or massive dump will happen. No polo plz. You look Stratis and NXC, Stratis was 15k for some moment, but it is hardly be there on poloniex, maybe big pump will come but who knows
Stratis hasn't needed Polo to make an X9 from the ICO. Since it was added to Polo, it has only lowered the price.
Just a note. That Poloniex adds Waves is good, but it's not that important.
I agree with you because Poloniex will surely add trading volume, but the token will also be easily manipulated there.
Stratis hasn't needed Polo to make an X9 from the ICO. Since it was added to Polo, it has only lowered the price.
Just a note. That Poloniex adds Waves is good, but it's not that important.
I think the reason why the centralized crypto exchanges do not hurry to list Waves because there is a conflict of interest between the two. They don't want to support a technology which makes them obsolete.
I'm so glad someone else said it. I've felt that way about poloniex since day one.
LOL no, poloniex couldn't care less about dex. it's all about volume and fees to gain.
and btw nxt and bts are listed since long time and they do offer dex as feature: the conflict of interest make no sense.
Probably Polo wont list WAVES because Sasha pissed them off too many times. Was a very bad move from Sasha
But besides that, I think WAVES has a bright future and will see stellar growth in 2017.
Definitely, sasha cursed poloniex and they hate sasha. He should be a real CEO and ignores every negative thing cuz he is so rich.
having an opinion is not "cursing" and is not reason for "hate", at least among professional adults
I agree, but it is still bad that Sasha's attitude towards Polo has negatively affected all WAVES investors. But anyway, such is life...
I think the reason why the centralized crypto exchanges do not hurry to list Waves because there is a conflict of interest between the two. They don't want to support a technology which makes them obsolete.
I'm so glad someone else said it. I've felt that way about poloniex since day one.
LOL no, poloniex couldn't care less about dex. it's all about volume and fees to gain.
and btw nxt and bts are listed since long time and they do offer dex as feature: the conflict of interest make no sense.
Probably Polo wont list WAVES because Sasha pissed them off too many times. Was a very bad move from Sasha
But besides that, I think WAVES has a bright future and will see stellar growth in 2017.
Definitely, sasha cursed poloniex and they hate sasha. He should be a real CEO and ignores every negative thing cuz he is so rich.
having an opinion is not "cursing" and is not reason for "hate", at least among professional adults
I think the reason why the centralized crypto exchanges do not hurry to list Waves because there is a conflict of interest between the two. They don't want to support a technology which makes them obsolete.
I'm so glad someone else said it. I've felt that way about poloniex since day one.
LOL no, poloniex couldn't care less about dex. it's all about volume and fees to gain.
and btw nxt and bts are listed since long time and they do offer dex as feature: the conflict of interest make no sense.
Probably Polo wont list WAVES because Sasha pissed them off too many times. Was a very bad move from Sasha
But besides that, I think WAVES has a bright future and will see stellar growth in 2017.
In due time I think more exchanges will list WAVES but I'm pretty sure nobody from Poloniex has any problems with any of the WAVES developers, there are probably other reasons for it not being listed and the project is still fairly new.
I think you will probably be right, unfortunately most people seem to expect an instant 5x ROI after buying into any random ICO in crypto.
I think the reason why the centralized crypto exchanges do not hurry to list Waves because there is a conflict of interest between the two. They don't want to support a technology which makes them obsolete.
I'm so glad someone else said it. I've felt that way about poloniex since day one.
LOL no, poloniex couldn't care less about dex. it's all about volume and fees to gain.
and btw nxt and bts are listed since long time and they do offer dex as feature: the conflict of interest make no sense.
Probably Polo wont list WAVES because Sasha pissed them off too many times. Was a very bad move from Sasha
But besides that, I think WAVES has a bright future and will see stellar growth in 2017.
Definitely, sasha cursed poloniex and they hate sasha. He should be a real CEO and ignores every negative thing cuz he is so rich.
I think the reason why the centralized crypto exchanges do not hurry to list Waves because there is a conflict of interest between the two. They don't want to support a technology which makes them obsolete.
I'm so glad someone else said it. I've felt that way about poloniex since day one.
LOL no, poloniex couldn't care less about dex. it's all about volume and fees to gain.
and btw nxt and bts are listed since long time and they do offer dex as feature: the conflict of interest make no sense.
Probably Polo wont list WAVES because Sasha pissed them off too many times. Was a very bad move from Sasha
But besides that, I think WAVES has a bright future and will see stellar growth in 2017.
Waves is looking prime for re-entry. Not a bad start for 2017 and a bright future ahead.
Very overvalued, almost no functions, delays follow delays. Dex will be not ready for sure at the end of january. Its not coming before summmer.
The price will go for sure more down.
Waves is looking prime for re-entry. Not a bad start for 2017 and a bright future ahead.
It is looking prime to tumble to ATL.
Waves is looking prime for re-entry. Not a bad start for 2017 and a bright future ahead.
Waves Platform community tokens in CoinTelegraph:
https://cointelegraph.com/press-releases/waves-blockchain-platform-introduces-new-framework-for-community-based-ratings-organizations
https://cointelegraph.com/press-releases/waves-blockchain-platform-introduces-new-framework-for-community-based-ratings-organizations
It's good to see waves in media but I would really wish to see articles about waves that are not either paid or written by waves team. The first thing I look at when I see new article mention : who wrote it? This one is paid, thestreet written by Evelina, some other features on some other sites written by Guy. Don't get me wrong, any promotion is good but I'd like to see organic interest in waves.. You know, sites actually writing about waves because they are interested in tech, waves,vision (or they write about it just to get click, it doesn't matter, as long as THEY write about waves). There seems to be little interest anywhere, it's almost like waves is being ignored. Waves needs to generate some news that will be picked up by media by themselves, it is only then we will know that the interest from broader public is here.
I've followed Waves for quite some time now, as I think it is a great project. I constantly read complaints on here about Waves not being on Poloni for one reason or another. I presume this is because you think that a listing on Poloni is the ticket to a Waves pump. I think that we could see an even bigger Waves pump while primarily on Bittrex though. Steem went up nearly 20 fold on Bittrex, but was then dumped on Poloni. Bittrex is far less liquid than Poloni. That means that if Waves garners the attention of the mainstream crypto audience, volume and buy orders could explode on Bittrex leading to pumps of over 5 fold. Just my thoughts. It might not be such a bad thing that Waves isn't listed on Poloni.
Waves Platform community tokens in CoinTelegraph:
https://cointelegraph.com/press-releases/waves-blockchain-platform-introduces-new-framework-for-community-based-ratings-organizations
https://cointelegraph.com/press-releases/waves-blockchain-platform-introduces-new-framework-for-community-based-ratings-organizations
Jump to: