Author

Topic: WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform. - page 486. (Read 2389197 times)

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
What is problem to discuss with exchanges about adding Waves? I can not understand you received an investment of more than $ 10 million and can not spend portion of these funds for expansion of trading opportunities Waves.

Poloniex doesn't ask for listing fee like bittrex, you know. Polo will add waves, i bet, they will add when the time is ready, not now, maybe next year, when waves releases more tech.

Poloniex will not add waves because of the Russian. We can bet with escrow if you think different.

It has nothing to do with that, if you think this you are a retard!

Then bet with him and show him he is not only a retard but a retarded loser!
sr. member
Activity: 281
Merit: 250
the ones that invested on this shit deserve to be scammed, you were warned several times since the ICO and still behaved like a stupid chimp

I am still trying to wrap my mind around why this thread had 10x more vitriol than any other new project in the crypto space. Why do people like you come on here and spend your time trying to lecture people about what they should and should not do?

Right now in the ETH eco-system you have a blockchain that just forked for the 4th time and dozens of ICO projects built on top of it - all of which are behind schedule and many of which are frozen in dev due to uncertainty with the ETH blockchain.

How the hell can you come on here and waste not just your own time but everyone elses posting useless comments? And its not just you, its literally hundreds of people like you and I can't figure out what the agenda is.

Yet another false equivalency post between ETH and Waves ....

When will you guys finally understand, ETH dwarfs Waves in every way - # of exchanges, # of devs, market cap, worldwide interest, and on and on and on .... waves is on one pathetic exchange with insignificant volume ... and no prospects in sight to be added on major exchanges ...  and a dev who has reneged on every promised "gateway" promise so far ...

Yet the posts will undoubtedly continue. "Just look at Eth!! ...."

Still here posting useless diatribes?

Get a life loser!

Ummm.... your definition of "a life" seems to include bagholding waves from 50k ....  so no thanks. don't need your life.

Support and volume is on life support.

Waves is going to the teens by the New Year. Whoever dumps into that 35 btc bid at 27 is the only one of you bagholders that will be having a merry christmas.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
What is problem to discuss with exchanges about adding Waves? I can not understand you received an investment of more than $ 10 million and can not spend portion of these funds for expansion of trading opportunities Waves.

Poloniex doesn't ask for listing fee like bittrex, you know. Polo will add waves, i bet, they will add when the time is ready, not now, maybe next year, when waves releases more tech.

Poloniex will not add waves because of the Russian. We can bet with escrow if you think different.

No, i won't bet, do you know why polo will not add waves due to nationality? Many russian scammers? I remember sasha trolled polo, it may be the biggest gap to list there.
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
What is problem to discuss with exchanges about adding Waves? I can not understand you received an investment of more than $ 10 million and can not spend portion of these funds for expansion of trading opportunities Waves.

POLO AREN'T ABOUT TO LIST A PRODUCT THAT ISN'T READY.

WAVES WILL BE A DECENTRALIZED EXCHANGE, THERE WILL BE NO COMPETITION AFTER THAT, WAVES NEEDS NOBODY!

yeah man, grow some Russian balls!
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
What is problem to discuss with exchanges about adding Waves? I can not understand you received an investment of more than $ 10 million and can not spend portion of these funds for expansion of trading opportunities Waves.

Poloniex doesn't ask for listing fee like bittrex, you know. Polo will add waves, i bet, they will add when the time is ready, not now, maybe next year, when waves releases more tech.

Poloniex will not add waves because of the Russian. We can bet with escrow if you think different.

It has nothing to do with that, if you think this you are a retard!
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
What is problem to discuss with exchanges about adding Waves? I can not understand you received an investment of more than $ 10 million and can not spend portion of these funds for expansion of trading opportunities Waves.

POLO AREN'T ABOUT TO LIST A PRODUCT THAT ISN'T READY.

WAVES WILL BE A DECENTRALIZED EXCHANGE, THERE WILL BE NO COMPETITION AFTER THAT, WAVES NEEDS NOBODY!
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
What is problem to discuss with exchanges about adding Waves? I can not understand you received an investment of more than $ 10 million and can not spend portion of these funds for expansion of trading opportunities Waves.

Poloniex doesn't ask for listing fee like bittrex, you know. Polo will add waves, i bet, they will add when the time is ready, not now, maybe next year, when waves releases more tech.

Poloniex will not add waves because of the Russian. We can bet with escrow if you think different.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
What is problem to discuss with exchanges about adding Waves? I can not understand you received an investment of more than $ 10 million and can not spend portion of these funds for expansion of trading opportunities Waves.

Poloniex doesn't ask for listing fee like bittrex, you know. Polo will add waves, i bet, they will add when the time is ready, not now, maybe next year, when waves releases more tech.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
the ones that invested on this shit deserve to be scammed, you were warned several times since the ICO and still behaved like a stupid chimp

I am still trying to wrap my mind around why this thread had 10x more vitriol than any other new project in the crypto space. Why do people like you come on here and spend your time trying to lecture people about what they should and should not do?

Right now in the ETH eco-system you have a blockchain that just forked for the 4th time and dozens of ICO projects built on top of it - all of which are behind schedule and many of which are frozen in dev due to uncertainty with the ETH blockchain.

How the hell can you come on here and waste not just your own time but everyone elses posting useless comments? And its not just you, its literally hundreds of people like you and I can't figure out what the agenda is.

Yet another false equivalency post between ETH and Waves ....

When will you guys finally understand, ETH dwarfs Waves in every way - # of exchanges, # of devs, market cap, worldwide interest, and on and on and on .... waves is on one pathetic exchange with insignificant volume ... and no prospects in sight to be added on major exchanges ...  and a dev who has reneged on every promised "gateway" promise so far ...

Yet the posts will undoubtedly continue. "Just look at Eth!! ...."

Still here posting useless diatribes?

Get a life loser!
sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 250
What is problem to discuss with exchanges about adding Waves? I can not understand you received an investment of more than $ 10 million and can not spend portion of these funds for expansion of trading opportunities Waves.
sr. member
Activity: 281
Merit: 250
the ones that invested on this shit deserve to be scammed, you were warned several times since the ICO and still behaved like a stupid chimp

I am still trying to wrap my mind around why this thread had 10x more vitriol than any other new project in the crypto space. Why do people like you come on here and spend your time trying to lecture people about what they should and should not do?

Right now in the ETH eco-system you have a blockchain that just forked for the 4th time and dozens of ICO projects built on top of it - all of which are behind schedule and many of which are frozen in dev due to uncertainty with the ETH blockchain.

How the hell can you come on here and waste not just your own time but everyone elses posting useless comments? And its not just you, its literally hundreds of people like you and I can't figure out what the agenda is.

Yet another false equivalency post between ETH and Waves ....

When will you guys finally understand, ETH dwarfs Waves in every way - # of exchanges, # of devs, market cap, worldwide interest, and on and on and on .... waves is on one pathetic exchange with insignificant volume ... and no prospects in sight to be added on major exchanges ...  and a dev who has reneged on every promised "gateway" promise so far ...

Yet the posts will undoubtedly continue. "Just look at Eth!! ...."
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
I think Bitcoin it is a digital gold. For the long time. And for the others tasks people will use others blockchains
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
A little while ago, R3 was like Mel Gibson’s Nick Marshall in What Women Want. It was the alpha male of the blockchain world, Wall Street’s gift to distributed ledger technology. The company exuded confidence, capable of seducing techies and finance types in equal measure. The sky was the limit and the world its oyster. Then came an unexpected wake-up call and the reality that it wasn’t quite pushing all the buttons it thought it was.

The decision by several major banks to leave R3 is by no means the death knell for the consortium, but it does raise that age-old mystery: what do businesses really want from their blockchain providers?

Bank run

R3, which consists of around 70 major players from the banking world, is a big deal. There is a huge amount of talent and influence embodied in the organization. Blockchain has a lot to offer the financial world, and R3’s mission was to deliver on the promises.

At the end of November four major banks – Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, the National Australian Bank and Banco Santander – took their leave in a move that prompted experts to suggest that the company was struggling to deliver anything of value. A total of seven banks are rumored to be leaving R3.

R3’s flagship projects — Corda, ‘a distributed ledger platform designed from the ground up to record, manage and synchronize financial agreements between regulated financial institutions,’ and a proof-of-concept KYC registry — have apparently failed to wave their partners’ flags. BTCManager’s Christoph Bergmann concludes, “Both Corda and the KYC-blockchain can be solutions to problems of the banking industry. But as the recent bank drain indicates, neither of R3’s projects seems to be the big thing everybody has waited for. Maybe the three banks just realized, that real innovation rarely blossoms in the gated community of a consortium of established institutions.”

Whilst we don’t know what went on behind closed doors, there’s a war brewing for the soul of blockchain, and if R3 isn’t at its epicenter then it,s symptomatic of its values.

The consortium was a magnet for funding and talent, attracting the likes of bitcoin royalty Ian Grigg, and former bitcoin developer Mike Hearn, who vocally bailed on bitcoin early this year, pronouncing it a failure before starting his new job.

Now it seems a rethink may be on the cards. The banks that have walked out on R3 are all pursuing their own blockchain projects, demonstrating that blockchain isn’t going out of fashion. It’s just that R3 wasn’t able to deliver quite what they wanted — whether in technical or business terms — or it may merely be banks seeing that they may become irrelevant and the banks are trying to keep their piece of the blockchain pie.

Read more: https://due.com/blog/big-business-blockchain-linux-vs-windows/
https://twitter.com/EvelinaLavrova/status/808327741602992128

Interesting read... what does this mean for waves?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 251
A little while ago, R3 was like Mel Gibson’s Nick Marshall in What Women Want. It was the alpha male of the blockchain world, Wall Street’s gift to distributed ledger technology. The company exuded confidence, capable of seducing techies and finance types in equal measure. The sky was the limit and the world its oyster. Then came an unexpected wake-up call and the reality that it wasn’t quite pushing all the buttons it thought it was.

The decision by several major banks to leave R3 is by no means the death knell for the consortium, but it does raise that age-old mystery: what do businesses really want from their blockchain providers?

Bank run

R3, which consists of around 70 major players from the banking world, is a big deal. There is a huge amount of talent and influence embodied in the organization. Blockchain has a lot to offer the financial world, and R3’s mission was to deliver on the promises.

At the end of November four major banks – Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, the National Australian Bank and Banco Santander – took their leave in a move that prompted experts to suggest that the company was struggling to deliver anything of value. A total of seven banks are rumored to be leaving R3.

R3’s flagship projects — Corda, ‘a distributed ledger platform designed from the ground up to record, manage and synchronize financial agreements between regulated financial institutions,’ and a proof-of-concept KYC registry — have apparently failed to wave their partners’ flags. BTCManager’s Christoph Bergmann concludes, “Both Corda and the KYC-blockchain can be solutions to problems of the banking industry. But as the recent bank drain indicates, neither of R3’s projects seems to be the big thing everybody has waited for. Maybe the three banks just realized, that real innovation rarely blossoms in the gated community of a consortium of established institutions.”

Whilst we don’t know what went on behind closed doors, there’s a war brewing for the soul of blockchain, and if R3 isn’t at its epicenter then it,s symptomatic of its values.

The consortium was a magnet for funding and talent, attracting the likes of bitcoin royalty Ian Grigg, and former bitcoin developer Mike Hearn, who vocally bailed on bitcoin early this year, pronouncing it a failure before starting his new job.

Now it seems a rethink may be on the cards. The banks that have walked out on R3 are all pursuing their own blockchain projects, demonstrating that blockchain isn’t going out of fashion. It’s just that R3 wasn’t able to deliver quite what they wanted — whether in technical or business terms — or it may merely be banks seeing that they may become irrelevant and the banks are trying to keep their piece of the blockchain pie.

Read more: https://due.com/blog/big-business-blockchain-linux-vs-windows/
https://twitter.com/EvelinaLavrova/status/808327741602992128
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
what caused the price to turn around? That looks good but the volume is a little low.
hero member
Activity: 716
Merit: 500
Looking at these prices it looks like a buying opportunity maybe a little lower then a buy just trading down and accumulating more waves. Can someone send me an invite to waves slack? Thanks
full member
Activity: 243
Merit: 100
After such Q&A I wonder why the price isn't rising every hour.
Euro gateway in two weeks (!), DEX in January, Microsoft Azure and more...

right .... two weeks ....

where have we heard that phrase before?
He says it is only the matter of technical implementation, all legal and organisational questions are solved.
So if we know about a testing soon, then it is really close... Absolutely!  Cool
sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
+1

They are either letting the steam off or they have an agenda. They might see Waves as a threat to their preferred coin/investment.


the ones that invested on this shit deserve to be scammed, you were warned several times since the ICO and still behaved like a stupid chimp

I am still trying to wrap my mind around why this thread had 10x more vitriol than any other new project in the crypto space. Why do people like you come on here and spend your time trying to lecture people about what they should and should not do?

Right now in the ETH eco-system you have a blockchain that just forked for the 4th time and dozens of ICO projects built on top of it - all of which are behind schedule and many of which are frozen in dev due to uncertainty with the ETH blockchain.

How the hell can you come on here and waste not just your own time but everyone elses posting useless comments? And its not just you, its literally hundreds of people like you and I can't figure out what the agenda is.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
the ones that invested on this shit deserve to be scammed, you were warned several times since the ICO and still behaved like a stupid chimp

I am still trying to wrap my mind around why this thread had 10x more vitriol than any other new project in the crypto space. Why do people like you come on here and spend your time trying to lecture people about what they should and should not do?

Right now in the ETH eco-system you have a blockchain that just forked for the 4th time and dozens of ICO projects built on top of it - all of which are behind schedule and many of which are frozen in dev due to uncertainty with the ETH blockchain.

How the hell can you come on here and waste not just your own time but everyone elses posting useless comments? And its not just you, its literally hundreds of people like you and I can't figure out what the agenda is.
Jump to: