Author

Topic: WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform. - page 701. (Read 2389197 times)

sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
What is your point what are you trying to make? That they are not doing anything? You have chosen to prove your point linking a one-liner change in github trivializing all the other commits and judging them as "some minor build script or config edit". This is simply not true. In this commit for example they have rewritten the peer-to-peer handshake algorithm: https://github.com/wavesplatform/Scorex/commit/33d917efeb8ee29e95f2aa513398a8b168115c91

Furthermore there is a continuous, heavy load on the testnet every day to check the reliability of the blockchain network. I can only repeat myself: Sasha's strategy is to release the main net only after having achieved an error-free stable testnet for a few weeks. And this is a very responsible approach, IMHO.



Yes, you are wrong. The main programmer responsible for the Waves back-end has made a lot of changes since the launch of the testnet: middle of August: https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/commits/master

You are right on the devnet. They have an own developer network where most of the work is being done. If a module is ready for testing they upload it to github.

That's exactly where I looked. So please prove me wrong and link at least one major fix or feature addition since 18 August which is not a version number change, Scorex merge or some minor build script or config edit. I want to see that "lots of changes".

All CPU, stability and blockchain size improvements mentioned above seem to be caused by this:
https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/commit/3cad6e3c244cdfe5b2efc3e20a60291f049d8323

This is not even a fix but a configuration for low-end hardware. This, together with restricting memory usage made the node more stable on cheap VPS most testers use.

And no, I didnt mean private network. I meant private Github branch.

FUD accusations are irrelevant. This thread needs some technical discussion Smiley Also, I'm giving everyone concerned an easy opportunity to hype the project some more by proving me wrong Wink
hero member
Activity: 690
Merit: 500
Yes, you are wrong. The main programmer responsible for the Waves back-end has made a lot of changes since the launch of the testnet: middle of August: https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/commits/master

You are right on the devnet. They have an own developer network where most of the work is being done. If a module is ready for testing they upload it to github.

That's exactly where I looked. So please prove me wrong and link at least one major fix or feature addition since 18 August which is not a version number change, Scorex merge or some minor build script or config edit. I want to see that "lots of changes".

All CPU, stability and blockchain size improvements mentioned above seem to be caused by this:
https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/commit/3cad6e3c244cdfe5b2efc3e20a60291f049d8323

This is not even a fix but a configuration for low-end hardware. This, together with restricting memory usage made the node more stable on cheap VPS most testers use.

And no, I didnt mean private network. I meant private Github branch.

FUD accusations are irrelevant. This thread needs some technical discussion Smiley Also, I'm giving everyone concerned an easy opportunity to hype the project some more by proving me wrong Wink
legendary
Activity: 1045
Merit: 1000
Those above are serious worries, I'd stay cautious.

60k is ok, not worries here
.m.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 260
Those above are serious worries, I'd stay cautious.
full member
Activity: 217
Merit: 100
Sasha said he will not released a buggy product. But with the current weak coder team that he has, their will always be bugs or something found that will cause a delay lol. Prepare for a release in mid 2017 at the earliest, if you can hold that long.

Also in the Q&A, it will be coinomat that will be integrated with mycelium and not WAVES since it is not ready lol

Also, I checked the monthly expense report and they burn $60,000+ a month? 20,200 go to programming and 14,300 in marketing alone? They spend that much to do not much? Lol




blablablablablabla... all knows all understand it...
full member
Activity: 192
Merit: 100
Sasha said he will not released a buggy product. But with the current weak coder team that he has, their will always be bugs or something found that will cause a delay lol. Prepare for a release in mid 2017 at the earliest, if you can hold that long.

Also in the Q&A, it will be coinomat that will be integrated with mycelium and not WAVES since it is not ready lol

Also, I checked the monthly expense report and they burn $60,000+ a month? 20,200 go to programming and 14,300 in marketing alone? They spend that much to do not much? Lol


legendary
Activity: 1045
Merit: 1000
Yes, you are wrong. The main programmer responsible for the Waves back-end has made a lot of changes since the launch of the testnet: middle of August: https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/commits/master

They want to be absolutely sure that the testnet is running stable for and extended period of time(few weeks) with alternating middle and heavy load. That's why there was relative calm in the last 1.5 week.

You are right on the devnet. They have an own developer network where most of the work is being done. If a module is ready for testing they upload it to github.


Since the launch of testnet there is only a bunch of version number changes and one test config edit. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Let me guess, all the important changes must be on the private branch not visible to outsiders?

Lets see if FUD continue

github is easy to find, contribution are real.
sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
Yes, you are wrong. The main programmer responsible for the Waves back-end has made a lot of changes since the launch of the testnet: middle of August: https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/commits/master

They want to be absolutely sure that the testnet is running stable for and extended period of time(few weeks) with alternating middle and heavy load. That's why there was relative calm in the last 1.5 week.

You are right on the devnet. They have an own developer network where most of the work is being done. If a module is ready for testing they upload it to github.


Since the launch of testnet there is only a bunch of version number changes and one test config edit. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Let me guess, all the important changes must be on the private branch not visible to outsiders?
sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
Not yet, but transcript is coming on this weekend, according to the team members in Slack.
It was the best Q & A session to date.

Is there any online summary available ?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
hi... is mediacore doing any transcript based on yesterday Q/A? Grin
hero member
Activity: 508
Merit: 500
Jahaha
It was the best Q & A session to date.

Is there any online summary available ?
hero member
Activity: 622
Merit: 504
Your only Amigo, in the World of Crypto
Hi guys! Welcome to the new Q&A Session. Smiley



Please retweet - https://twitter.com/wavesplatform/status/774181082199576577

Just answer one question, when are the full nodes releasing?

As soon as the test phase will be completed.

Why can't WAVES do a weekly update like this? LISK is doing a way better job lol

https://blog.lisk.io/weekly-summary-001-3be1a5a79333#.jjh10f6qo

I think WAVES can do it also, they have so much more resources than LISK.

urm...haven't WAVES been doing it all this time already? with the weekly updates and the next one is supposingly #9 (this week)?
sr. member
Activity: 459
Merit: 250
Hi guys! Welcome to the new Q&A Session. Smiley



Please retweet - https://twitter.com/wavesplatform/status/774181082199576577

Just answer one question, when are the full nodes releasing?

As soon as the test phase will be completed.

Why can't WAVES do a weekly update like this? LISK is doing a way better job lol

https://blog.lisk.io/weekly-summary-001-3be1a5a79333#.jjh10f6qo

I think WAVES can do it also, they have so much more resources than LISK.
hero member
Activity: 690
Merit: 500
I am a Waves beta tester. I can tell you that progress is being made and we are close to the release of the main net.

This is the real truth. Perhaps this process took longer time than we expected, but nevertheless the Waves team continues to work hard and actively. That's right.

What makes you think so? I mean facts, preferably technical.

Facts - https://github.com/wavesplatform

New version of testnet node (0.2.4): Low CPU/Ram usage. Much more stable the blockchain.dat file. The total stability and so on.

Since the launch of testnet there is only a bunch of version number changes and one test config edit. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Let me guess, all the important changes must be on the private branch not visible to outsiders?
full member
Activity: 192
Merit: 100
Hi guys! Welcome to the new Q&A Session. Smiley



Please retweet - https://twitter.com/wavesplatform/status/774181082199576577

Just answer one question, when are the full nodes releasing?

As soon as the test phase will be completed.

Why can't WAVES do a weekly update like this? LISK is doing a way better job lol

https://blog.lisk.io/weekly-summary-001-3be1a5a79333#.jjh10f6qo
hero member
Activity: 1708
Merit: 606
Buy The F*cking Dip
It was the best Q & A session to date.

Never had the chance to attend Sasha's Q&A. Do you happen to remember some key points/questions that were answered by Sasha? Wave's value is still declining by this minute.

sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
Send a DM to twiggy.smile for an invite.
how do we get into the waves slack channel?
hero member
Activity: 494
Merit: 500
how do we get into the waves slack channel?
sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
It was the best Q & A session to date.
sr. member
Activity: 581
Merit: 250
Thanks for sharing. Listening now. Hopefully good news.
Jump to: