Author

Topic: WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform. - page 784. (Read 2389197 times)

hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 511
Im the One who Knocks.
150 Bitcoin to only 33k sats, that still lower than ICO price, after how many months now? 2? feels like more  Angry
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1003
Your master sash sash has a serious attitude problem thinking he is the man with other people's BTC. my coin dumped from this shit show, yeh yeh all 1000 of them.

You dumping 1000 Waves made such an impact to the wall.

sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
I LOVE THE LIR PROJECT
Your master sash sash has a serious attitude problem thinking he is the man with other people's BTC. my coin dumped from this shit show, yeh yeh all 1000 of them.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1003
.  Didn't Steem hit like $3-4 while on Bittrex alone?  
I thought 80% of steem was owned by owners so they easily manipulated the bittrex price. Not sure about that though.

Quote
Was your only reason for investing in Waves was because you thought it would be listed on Polo?
no, but if no full nodes is not the reason it is not yet listed on polo then what is the real reason? It's not that waves is not on polo is main concern, concern is why then?



Then it's on Polo.  Nothing Sasha or Waves can do about it.  It's like when you hate someone, nothing they can do will make you like them.  

why would they hate sasha and waves, that is the question.

Dude, that was just an analogy.  I don't know if they hate Sasha or not.  Maybe you can ask this person. 
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
.  Didn't Steem hit like $3-4 while on Bittrex alone?  
I thought 80% of steem was owned by owners so they easily manipulated the bittrex price. Not sure about that though.

Quote
Was your only reason for investing in Waves was because you thought it would be listed on Polo?
no, but if no full nodes is not the reason it is not yet listed on polo then what is the real reason? It's not that waves is not on polo is main concern, concern is why then?



Then it's on Polo.  Nothing Sasha or Waves can do about it.  It's like when you hate someone, nothing they can do will make you like them.  

why would they hate sasha and waves, that is the question.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Why is everyone so upset about what Sasha has said. Is it only because now we might not get listed on the great Polo?

not being on polo doesn't necessarily makes waves a bad investment.

I'd say it is more WHY not? The usual excuse (made by people here, not waves team) was no full nodes yet... well full nodes are coming soif it is not added then why not?
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1003
.  Didn't Steem hit like $3-4 while on Bittrex alone?  
I thought 80% of steem was owned by owners so they easily manipulated the bittrex price. Not sure about that though.

Quote
Was your only reason for investing in Waves was because you thought it would be listed on Polo?
no, but if no full nodes is not the reason it is not yet listed on polo then what is the real reason? It's not that waves is not on polo is main concern, concern is why then?



Then it's on Polo.  Nothing Sasha or Waves can do about it.  It's like when you hate someone, nothing they can do will make you like them.  
sr. member
Activity: 437
Merit: 250
Why is everyone so upset about what Sasha has said. Is it only because now we might not get listed on the great Polo?

not being on polo doesn't necessarily makes waves a bad investment.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1003
GUYS I AM DISAPPOINTED, LET'S GET BACK TO THE LAMBO TALK WE USED TO SEE HERE ALL THE TIME, JUST LIKE LISK CUCKS!!!!



DO NOT FORGET ALL!!!!

For a Lambo, I prefer one of the colors of Skittles candy. 

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
.  Didn't Steem hit like $3-4 while on Bittrex alone?  
I thought 80% of steem was owned by owners so they easily manipulated the bittrex price. Not sure about that though.

Quote
Was your only reason for investing in Waves was because you thought it would be listed on Polo?
no, but if no full nodes is not the reason it is not yet listed on polo then what is the real reason? It's not that waves is not on polo is main concern, concern is why then? You said it yourself, big trading volume possible from waves and good earning to polo..so why not after the full nodes will be released? We still dont know if yes or no but his tweets indicate that it wont gt listed.

legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
GUYS I AM DISAPPOINTED, LET'S GET BACK TO THE LAMBO TALK WE USED TO SEE HERE ALL THE TIME, JUST LIKE LISK CUCKS!!!!



DO NOT FORGET ALL!!!!
hero member
Activity: 703
Merit: 500
should I buy some at this price ?
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1003
It's Waves buying time.  There's no point in kissing Polo's ass just to try to get listed on there.  Sasha spoke his mind and I give him props for it.  Whoever is selling in fear of not being listed on Polo will regret it sooner or later.  Didn't Steem hit like $3-4 while on Bittrex alone?  Polo is about money and once Waves full node is released and they notice the volume, it'll be added.  Money talks!  Even if it doesn't, who really cares.  Was your only reason for investing in Waves was because you thought it would be listed on Polo?  That's just as bad as someone I saw posted "I just invested in your ICO, I don't have time to read through the thread, what is your coin about?" lol
sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
Why are you calling Sasha an idiot. What is he doing wrong in your opinion?

Am I the only one who is worried by Sasha's tweets about polo and ETC? I am not saying at all if he is right or wrong. Some say polo will never list waves after such tweets but I think that the fact that polo wont list waves has already been known to Sasha for some time now. So it is not like he 'started a war", like someone mentioned, I think it is more like he knows waves wont be on polo so he has no reservations to say what he thinks is right.
This worries me. It's not like polo is a make it or break it for every coin but it surely is important. I mean, is there even 1 coin in the history of cryptocurrency that is doing well an isn't listed on polo? Hopefully it is not like this but I'm still thinking that the reason why Sasha is so direct is becasue he might have some confirmation that waves wont be on polo so now he is free to speak his mind. Otherwise, I dont see the reason why would one want to piss off polo moderators.


I'm very disappointed as well. A listing on Poloniex is perceived by many as an "endorsement" for a solid project.

Waves is a potential threat to the Poloniex business model.

And I thought I'd heard it all. Waves is no threat to Poloniex in the slightest and never will be with that idiot behind the wheel of this project. Giving someone like that so much money has gone to his tiny brain.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
ICO Chicken Dinner :)
Am I the only one who is worried by Sasha's tweets about polo and ETC? I am not saying at all if he is right or wrong. Some say polo will never list waves after such tweets but I think that the fact that polo wont list waves has already been known to Sasha for some time now. So it is not like he 'started a war", like someone mentioned, I think it is more like he knows waves wont be on polo so he has no reservations to say what he thinks is right.
This worries me. It's not like polo is a make it or break it for every coin but it surely is important. I mean, is there even 1 coin in the history of cryptocurrency that is doing well an isn't listed on polo? Hopefully it is not like this but I'm still thinking that the reason why Sasha is so direct is becasue he might have some confirmation that waves wont be on polo so now he is free to speak his mind. Otherwise, I dont see the reason why would one want to piss off polo moderators.


I'm very disappointed as well. A listing on Poloniex is perceived by many as an "endorsement" for a solid project.

Waves is a potential threat to the Poloniex business model.

And I thought I'd heard it all. Waves is no threat to Poloniex in the slightest and never will be with that idiot behind the wheel of this project. Giving someone like that so much money has gone to his tiny brain.
sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
Waves will implement a decentralized asset exchange which will include a crypto exchange! No more need for websites you can buy/sell assets(e.g. crpytos) on the blockchain! Sasha is a genius!  Smiley
Am I the only one who is worried by Sasha's tweets about polo and ETC? I am not saying at all if he is right or wrong. Some say polo will never list waves after such tweets but I think that the fact that polo wont list waves has already been known to Sasha for some time now. So it is not like he 'started a war", like someone mentioned, I think it is more like he knows waves wont be on polo so he has no reservations to say what he thinks is right.
This worries me. It's not like polo is a make it or break it for every coin but it surely is important. I mean, is there even 1 coin in the history of cryptocurrency that is doing well an isn't listed on polo? Hopefully it is not like this but I'm still thinking that the reason why Sasha is so direct is becasue he might have some confirmation that waves wont be on polo so now he is free to speak his mind. Otherwise, I dont see the reason why would one want to piss off polo moderators.


I'm very disappointed as well. A listing on Poloniex is perceived by many as an "endorsement" for a solid project.

Waves is a potential threat to the Poloniex business model.
sr. member
Activity: 368
Merit: 250
sideways time... best to hibernate for a while.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Am I the only one who is worried by Sasha's tweets about polo and ETC? I am not saying at all if he is right or wrong. Some say polo will never list waves after such tweets but I think that the fact that polo wont list waves has already been known to Sasha for some time now. So it is not like he 'started a war", like someone mentioned, I think it is more like he knows waves wont be on polo so he has no reservations to say what he thinks is right.
This worries me. It's not like polo is a make it or break it for every coin but it surely is important. I mean, is there even 1 coin in the history of cryptocurrency that is doing well an isn't listed on polo? Hopefully it is not like this but I'm still thinking that the reason why Sasha is so direct is becasue he might have some confirmation that waves wont be on polo so now he is free to speak his mind. Otherwise, I dont see the reason why would one want to piss off polo moderators.


I'm very disappointed as well. A listing on Poloniex is perceived by many as an "endorsement" for a solid project.

Waves is a potential threat to the Poloniex business model.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 511
Im the One who Knocks.
Well if i was Sasha, i would be wanting to prove people wrong and create a fantastic platform, but, hey, its hard to get motivated, when it is not your own money you are using and thats the simple truth here.

Thats why I/OCoin who use their own money, will be around longer than Waves will be.
hero member
Activity: 598
Merit: 500
lack of consideration for investors from the sasha  is very alarming
investors gave the sasha 20mil $$ now he has the funds
but the dev on waves can't even hold his tongue..nor have the decency to  remove the  1 million coins off trex
who would try to push the price when the dev has biggest wallet on trex waiting to dump?
i don't know  why he needs to keep any coin on "centralized " exchange ..i can't think of any reason to keep that many coins on an exchange
if some one has any thoughts on why sasha  needs to have 1 million coins  on trex please fill me in...
anyway old saying "loose lips sink ships"
Jump to: