I am asking what is holding the public release, because I am interested to know why. Your answer is so unprofessional and it does not reflect a good project that you are representing.
You can just easily omit that and just stick to your bolded sentence, why do you want to put that in a response anyway, that's what I am talking about on unprofessional response.
It will depend on the number of errors and time to resolve it. Once testing will be complete, the main net code for nodes will be released. My friend, it was the humor. Anyway I wish you all the best and have a good day.
WAVES Weekly No. 3 Public Full Node Release Candidate
https://blog.wavesplatform.com/waves-weekly-no-3-b119d7b64e54#.mhtq31tf6###
Waves asset specification
https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/blob/master/Assetsspecification.mdNo offense, but obviously you nor most of the Waves team have experience with software development. So your timeline depends on bugs? So you're just going to take your sweet ass time? Imagine a company with $16 mil USD funding saying that. When a company announces a product, they have a timeline. They also have time allotted for QA. They don't just do QA for as long as it takes. That's a bullshit response. That's a response from someone who has no clue. Waves has nothing to do with DAO. You guys are making excuses.
Testnet should have been running before the ICO. Main should have been up after the ICO. What then is the point of the ICO? I believe the real issue is Waves had no actual developers. They raised money on an idea, and now that they finally have a developer perhaps they're trying to sort things out. Or they're just waiting on the Scorex project to update so they can continue to clone and update their project.
Maybe you shouldn't have eaten through $10 mil USD of your budget just for incremental wallet updates. Isn't the node more important? I do consulting work for large tech companies in Silicon Valley and this is not how a project operates. This has amateur written all over it. Pump all you want, but this isn't pump worthy yet.
You know what it's like. It's like Apple saying they will release a new iPhone on a specific date (like an ICO). People line up and pre-order it. Then when the launch date arrives, Apple says "oh actually, we haven't built a prototype yet." And then, after a month, they finally build a prototype. Tons of people are upset. Then they say, "we'll release the iPhone when it's done testing all the bugs", with no date given. When pressed for a response, they say "oh you want an iPhone full of bugs?"
That is what this is like. No we don't want Waves with bugs and issues. We want a development team that sticks to their promises and their word. People invested, they didn't donate for you to make incremental wallet updates for $10 mil USD and then take your jolly time bug testing something you barely built. Asking people if they want a product with bugs is just a really poor excuse. You have no timeline.
I've asked this before and I'll ask again, what is Sasha's technical background? Is there any example of his previous development work? Or is he just a wantrapreneur schemer blowing donation money?
go keep on crying coinbiz after your last failed price manipulation lol
