Topic: We are going to be devating the scaling issue until we are old (Read 1435 times)

"Devating?" Do you mean "evading?"   

You entirely didn't understand the math. Both of your blue comments are incorrect. Sorry but you really need to go re-read and learn 8th grade mathematics. What were you doing since age 13 that you've forgotten the math that you were taught then.

Satoshi was so genius that he designed the AsicBoost into the design.

I can say that with great confidence because double-hashing defeats attacks such as AsicBoost, and Satoshi did double-hashing as a precaution every where it could be required in his design except for the proof-of-work.

He managed to think far ahead on the game theory and realized he would need a poison pill to ensure that no one could modify his evil design.

So therefor he created a design that he knew the Chinese ASIC manufacturers would figure out how to make covert AsicBoost and that if it was patented outside of China, then this would be the poison pill against any changes to the protocol (as I have recently explained at @gmaxwell's Redditard discussion).

@dinofelis STFU on your nonsense about Satoshi wasn't genius. I've strongly refuted all of your nonsense technical claims. Stop your lying nonsense.

The whales do because they will be paying 0% fees, as I explained in my prior post.

And everyone who can afford it, will still want to hodl BTC, because the price is going to the moon.

So it will be a process that as the price rises, more and more riff-raff get priced out of the block chain. But those who remain will hodl because the price is rising logistically.

Really you need to think this out. It works very well economically and Satoshi was an evil genius.

You have an incomplete mathematical conceptualization.

You can't just analyze from the perspective of a percentage fee, because the blocksize is constrained.

It can become possible that transacting in morsels as small as 1 BTC is no longer possible.

No one wants a bitcoin network where they'll have to pay more than 1% of the transaction amount as a fee, paypal taking 2% in average and they even give you the chance of charge back, why are you fooling yourselves? thinking BTC will continue like this, no one forced to use bitcoin in the first place.
Looks like every one forgetting that? people will slowly move on like it never happened. as long as bitcoin has something interesting to say and offer community will follow otherwise they wont go for something that will cause them great loss. some of you are just kids in adult's bodies imagining a $500k per coin price and stuff like that, just wait and see a few month after fees grow higher than 2% you'll see how the support fades away.

I disagree. People will see an incentive to hold bitcoin as long as the price keeps going to the moon. If the fee is 0.01 BTC, but the price of 1 BTC is $10,000 with prospects of going $100,000 BTC, then who is the idiot that doesn't want to hold that?

As long as the price keeps going up and the fees allow you to move your wealth when needed, it will have an incentive to be the holder's coin.

If the fee becomes higher than 99% of people's wealth and only billionaires see a point in using it, well that's a problem, everyone else will have dumped and only a few will be using it (and I don't see how it can survive in this state, since barely any transaction volume would be going on for miners to be worth mining)

I think the people espousing monster fees are already stuck in the mind set that Bitcoin has already triumphed. Maybe in one's own echo chamber, but out in the big bad world that certainly isn't the case.

The longer it survives and the more expensive it becomes to use produces two things - ever increasing knowledge to come up with something better and the incentive to create it.

iamnotback

you set your own opinion, yep opinion.
then when people try to correct it you try to defend your opinion by quoting yourself.
same goes for your 'nashian' debates of talking to yourself.

quoting yourself does not make your opinion stronger.

but please try to learn about bitcoin, because the more you talk about FIAT prices the less interested you seem to care about bitcoins sustainability and only seem to be watching for an exit price back to the land of a fiat holder.

anyway goodluck with your life. and i hope one day you do go back holding alot of fiat.

It is logical to think that Fee will be in ever increasing state unless some code is changed and create a fixed amount for transaction fee depending not on the bytes but rather to the amount of BTC to send.  If this ever increasing fee is not fixed, then all I can see is a dead BTC in the future. Or just some expensive store of value at least.

For now it certainly looks like we are stuck - 30% of miners don't care about any scaling solution and they are not signalling anything.
We are testing how far status quo will take us, but patience of users and business is running out.

BTC might evolve to be ultimate capital investment... and nothing more.

That would be the end and ultimate fail so let's hope we will never see that happen. It defeats the purpose of cryptocurrency.

Good quote,our grand children will read about it in his daily news

Thanks I am doing too much multi-tasking (have a short open on LTC at same time writing posts, its 4am and I haven't slept for 2 days, etc). I'll correct my post.

600 blocks is the delay for spending coinbase. Litecoin is closer at 576.

P.S. Readers note that @franky1 has a vendetta against me because I pointed out that he doesn't understand logic and also he makes technological blunders, and then I deleted his vile reply from the thread because I had warned him to be respectful or leave. Every time he acts like an ass, I will advertise his logic error again. Maybe eventually he'll learn to not be an asshurl. Making war against me isn't wise. I'm a sincere person who tries to help others, but I'll destroy asshurls.

144 blocks a day..
but dont stop learning

Well we can estimate given that BTC trades 1/100th of its market cap daily. So @ $500k per BTC thus a $10 trillion market cap, thus $100 billion transacted daily. Given 144 blocks per day, that is $600 million per block.

Let's assume that whales will put complex settlement transactions on the blockchain with many inputs and outputs so perhaps only 100 transactions per block. Presuming that whales are willing to pay 0.1% fee for security (i.e. $600,000 per block), that means a minimum transaction fee of $6000. If whales are willing to pay more for security, say 1%, then minimum transaction fee of $60,000.

However, I think whales will end up demanding a kickback from miners for their transaction fees, so that miners can jack up fees on non-whales. Whales can make this demand because they can refuse to send their transactions to miners which won't deal. Yet non-whales can't make a credible threat, because miners who generally offered lower fees would end up losing hashrate relative to those miners who didn't defect from the fee market. Thus I think you will probably see miners colluding to extract the maximum fees that gouge non-whales.

So perhaps 10% fees so $600,000 per transaction. You'll pay it because you have no choice, whereas the whales will have exempted themselves from the fee. So in other words, we will be paying the fees for the whales, eventually the millionaires paying exorbitant fees in order to transact unregulated.

You'll of course be able to avoid that exorbitant fees by going through a regulated option as I explained previously.

So the bottom line is the whales will be free from regulation and we will not. We remain slaves.


Monitor the fees paid in blocks. It will gradually rise over the coming years.


It is a function of the supply and demand for BTC. As the demand for transactions outstrips supply of block size space, the transaction fees will rise accordingly. You can project if you can project BTC transaction demand.


Well they exist. MP is one of them. You can speak to him on his IRC channel. Ask him if you want. Be sincere and maybe he won't be too hard on you.

Better to ask directly while you still can access him. I provided the link to his IRC in my prior post.

Please notify us after you did.


Well I think the price of Bitcoin will rise to greater than $10,000 before you have any problem about the fees, as long as you are only spending minimum increments of 1 BTC.


Well at 20 BTC you probably be able to cash out more than a $million if you don't encounter the other pitfalls I mentioned.

We are headed into a difficult time with collapsing governments, chaos, and war.

But if you are clever, you might make it through in a good situation. Remain alert and astute. Don't stop learning.

---

I will start to think bitcoin as useless coin only When bitcoin will loss all its miners and there will be not much active nodes for bitcoin. I don't think this gonna happen in near future.

If you receive lots of small amount of bitcoin in several transactions, yes fees can be more than your holding in future. I have also seen few transactions where fees and amount in transactions almost same several times.

as for the fee/spam thing

I am impressed. This is the best, most reasonable post I have ever seen from you, franky. I am not SegWit or BU supporter, myself, but this post explains much.

High fees are a real problem – every time I talk to people about bitcoin, who are not aware of it, I try to avoid this fees thing because it surely keeps them away. 

ignoring the first sentance (im didnt include in ur quote) you have a very level headed question

my opinion
we are already at and passed the utility point.

if your basing it on moving 1btc... the answer is naturally when it becomes costly to the point of over 1% (so 0.01btc fee) to move it people will lose preferential desire to hold bitcoin.

of course bitcoin fee's dont work as % and most people are not moving funds in 1btc amounts. usually in real life of going to an ATM and banking its $10-$100amounts on average 'spend'. that people withdraw/handle/carry around/spend.
so based on a 0.01-0.1 spend amount .. 0.0001-0.001fee

in developing countries its $0.10-$10(0.0001- 0.01) amounts so (0.000001-0.0001fee)

i have been to a few countries trying to drum up bitcoin support and the main objections is the fee.. $0.60 is about 12 hours labour in some countries so when you tell them they need to work 12 hours just to move funds.. yep you guessed it they are not interested.

bitcoin has become too american economist minded (only for the rich wall streeters) and has been shaped by those refusing to allow onchain growth to keep pushing fake narratives of 'but pools need higher fee's tonight' propaganda. which has made it unattainable to the unbanked/developing countries (unless your a rich nigerian prince/oil baron)

though onchain transactions should not be a world history report of every doughnut bought. it should not cost hours of labour to use it either.

im sure if LN had a $0.0001 LN channel fee and an onchain $0.01 people who spend often will naturally volunteer to use LN. and then we can code a better fee priority mechanism to slowdown/stop spammers onchain from spending every 10 minutes by using CODE not economics.
EG coinage under 144 confirms. fee is higher

But you're one of the core shills who wants these high fees - yet is still planning their dump?
This post just shows the stupidity of the core roadmap, and complete lack of understanding by many vocal accounts here.