![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fcointelegraph.com%2Fimages%2F720_aHR0cDovL2NvaW50ZWxlZ3JhcGguY29tL3N0b3JhZ2UvdXBsb2Fkcy92aWV3LzJiNzFhMThiOGY0NGI3YWJiNmZkZjBkZjMxZWU0OGJhLnBuZw%3D%3D.jpg&t=591&c=aC4RewKeS8RYwQ)
Wow, that's kind of scary.
But on the other hand, if Eth fails to create a partitioned network, you could be witnessing one of the greatest fortunes ever lost. I don't see how it will work, but maybe he's smarter than everyone believes. I've always hated Eth due to it being released with an invalid consensus mechanism since everyone would consider it a flop if it had to stay on PoW, but that's what it was released with and it's still there. Not to mention needing partitioning to be useful on top of that. As an investor, it just feels like you're buying something that isn't even in real proof of concept yet since the consensus and partitioning is more important than the VM itself, so it's a pretty god damn hard sell.