Wait, where did you get that source man? I mean, if they are really trying to make this a facade to fool the judge and the entire community, wouldn't it be dangerous? because if Ira tried to back down, then Craig would win the court and would also win the rights for Bitcoin? This is pretty messed up if this is actually true.
in a previous post where i summerised IRA's request for a default judgement it came from
ira's recent filing
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.595.0.pdfyou can see it on like page 19&20. but ill quote it here to save time
ira wants the judge to
First, deem the following facts established: “(1) Dr. Wright and Dave [Kleiman] entered into a 50/50 partnership to develop blockchain-related intellectual property and mine bitcoin; (2) all bitcoin (and forked assets) included in the CSW Filed List is, and remains, property of the partnership; and (3) any such intellectual property developed by Wright prior to Dave’s death is, and remains, property of the partnership.” Id.at 24. According to Plaintiffs, Defendant’s alleged misconduct has made it “extremely difficult to rely on any evidence produced by Wright in this action—including his own statements—to support any fact at issue in this litigation.” Id.Thus, this alternative sanction “cures the wrongdoing.” Id.Second, as an alternative, Plaintiffs request the Court permit an adverse inference instruction as follows: “(1) Wright has committed perjury, produced fabricated evidence, and withheld relevant evidence with respect to whether (a) he and David were partners, (b) the activities of their partnership, and (c) the extent of the partnership’s assets; and (2) the jury may, if it so chooses, properly infer from this misconduct that (a) Wright and David entered into a 50/50 partnership to develop blockchain-related intellectual property and mine bitcoin, (b) any such
intellectual property developed by Wright prior to Dave’s death was property of the partnership, and (c) all bitcoin included in the CSW Filed List is property of the partnership.”
basically 'first'
1. deem that CSW and dave did have a partnership
2.all bitcoins and altcoins listed by CSW ramain property of the partnership
3. all intellectual property of the partnership remain property of partnership
(basically validate a trust and assert they are satoshi without proof but infer it due to lack of proof(facepalm))
'second'
judge that CSW lack of evidence of
1a) CSW and dave were partners
1b)the activities of the partnership (claim they were satoshi)
1c)there are 820k bitcoins 'somewhere'
must result in
2a) jury to give default verdict that there was a partnership of creating bitcoin
2b) jury to give a verdict that bitcoin and other creations are part of the partnership
2c) jury to give default verdict all coins in CSW fake list then become the partners property
yep no evidence. but just wanting a judge/jury to give a verdict that then makes it 'their property' (facepalm)
no where has IRA's team tried to clam that CSW is a pennyless scammer. they are both playing the same side of trying to get a judges order that flows in favour to making the 'trust a valuable asset based on judges rule. not reality fact. trying to make it that by 'law' craig invented bitcoin. not by reality fact. but by judges rule
and IRA has not made claim that would result in any actual punishment for CSW