Topic: ★ We want @marlboroza on DT1 again ★ (Read 906 times)
Oh dear, you need to have a cup of tea, take a Bex and have a good lie down.
Am replying here because this discussion is off-topic for the thread it was started in... 
Do you think that you are owner of Known Alts thread so you can start shitting on other people and people are not allowed to reply? Don't you have some unanswered questions in that thread?The guy who wants us to distrust him (without explanation) is pondering if those around him are paranoid?
Explain me this post. Then explain everything posted in last few pages in known alts, and as you pick only one thing from my last post in known alts, feel free to discuss every single thing mentioned in that post, and as you went full troll after this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49916524 feel free to discuss links from that post too.
we all know he wants us to distrust him
You are making things up over and over again. Quote me exactly part of my post where I specifically said "I want people to distrust me". What part of "exclude me from DT2" you don't understand?
Very well... I've highlighted the part of your post that shows where you specifically ask us to distrust you.
Go here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
Add this to your trust list:
~marlboroza
I will bump this until I am excluded.
No explanation. No questions, no PM. Not addressing.
Thank you.
Love you all. Except scammers.
Add this to your trust list:
~marlboroza
I will bump this until I am excluded.
No explanation. No questions, no PM. Not addressing.
Thank you.
Love you all. Except scammers.
The opposite of Positive Trust is Negative Trust.
Positive trust means the "you trust someone"
Negative trust means that "you distrust someone"
I see that you speak Croatian. Wonderful country - I hope to be able to visit it one day. Perhaps it is because of the subtleties of differing languages that when you ask people to put
Quote
~marlboroza
on their DT trust wall you are in effect asking them to distrust you. Which even myself are reluctant to do.
Am replying here because this discussion is off-topic for the thread it was started in...
I quoted what you should read.
You said this:
Excuse me, what am I trying to rewrite?
You said this:
Quote
There's also a positive as well: (you probably can't see it given how many positive trust posts you have on your trust wall)
And you should focus on this:Quote
It is impossible for me not to see and to forget first positive feedback I received.
And this one was a joke...Quote
I masturbated on it for few days IIRC.
Excuse me, what am I trying to rewrite?
I voted "No" and that won't happen.
@TalkStar Please fix thread, it contains false information, such as:
You shouldn't jump to conclusions like this...
Hey, what's with neutral?There's also a positive as well: (you probably can't see it)
It is impossible for me not to see and to forget first positive feedback I received.
@TalkStar Please fix thread, it contains false information, such as:
You shouldn't jump to conclusions like this...Quote
What a pity marlboroza is trying to rewrite history by not actually following the link http://archive.fo/2P4CR#selection-5877.85-5877.123 which reads:
Quote
I masturbated on it for few days IIRC.
This is why I removed marlboroza - selectively confrontational.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 4282
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
I voted No
Reason, the new DT system needs users who're not just actively bursting scammers but willing to accept the responsibility of a DT member which includes participating in the politics aspect associated with it. You don't vote someone into power to handle a position he has started publicly that he isn't interested. marlboroza feedbacks are accurate and impressive but let's just respect his decision and hope, maybe he'll change his decision someday.
Reason, the new DT system needs users who're not just actively bursting scammers but willing to accept the responsibility of a DT member which includes participating in the politics aspect associated with it. You don't vote someone into power to handle a position he has started publicly that he isn't interested. marlboroza feedbacks are accurate and impressive but let's just respect his decision and hope, maybe he'll change his decision someday.
I want to vote "Yes," but out respect for marlboroza's wishes I'm abstaining from the vote. Like others, I value marlboroza's reviews and want to be able to see his influence on users' trust score. I'll be keeping him in my custom trust list as well.
I voted "No" and that won't happen.
@TalkStar Please fix thread, it contains false information, such as:
You shouldn't jump to conclusions like this...
It is impossible for me not to see and to forget first positive feedback I received.
stop the drama its getting to obvious. @TalkStar Please fix thread, it contains false information, such as:
You shouldn't jump to conclusions like this...Quote
Hey, what's with neutral?
There's also a positive as well: (you probably can't see it)
I voted "No" and that won't happen.
@TalkStar Please fix thread, it contains false information, such as:
You shouldn't jump to conclusions like this...
It is impossible for me not to see and to forget first positive feedback I received.
@TalkStar Please fix thread, it contains false information, such as:
You shouldn't jump to conclusions like this...Quote
Hey, what's with neutral?
There's also a positive as well: (you probably can't see it)
I think Marlboroza's well researched trust feedbacks have been and are of value to the forum and to its members, so he's staying on my inclusion list which means that, while I stay DT1, they will continue to be visible by default as he will stay as DT2 (whether he likes it or not).
I've voted no because marlboroza's replies to me in his (me me) thread were disrespectful towards me after I asked if we should include his two known alts in the distrust.
While I won't be placing marlboroza on my DT negative list (such as it is) I have taken a few days to carefully conciser his attitude and have, for the time being, removed him from my DT trust list.
While I won't be placing marlboroza on my DT negative list (such as it is) I have taken a few days to carefully conciser his attitude and have, for the time being, removed him from my DT trust list.
Just some small correction >
Marlboroza want to be excluded from D2 , not only D1.
That was his request from day 1 in his thread, because he removed himself from the DT1 by deleting his trust list.
So keeping him in your trust lists is against his will.
I still have him in my trust list, tho.
Marlboroza want to be excluded from D2 , not only D1.
That was his request from day 1 in his thread, because he removed himself from the DT1 by deleting his trust list.
So keeping him in your trust lists is against his will.
Quote
Remove marlboroza (me, me) from DT2
I still have him in my trust list, tho.
Most of the people doesnt want him in his DT position,so respect that OP.
We have our own reasons not to do something we used to do,respect the man.
We have our own reasons not to do something we used to do,respect the man.
You have a different definition of respect than I do.
Perhaps you should learn what it means to respect someone who doesn’t want something.
Am on mobile and voted yes because I misclicked. I meant to vote 🗳 no.
It doesn't matter anyone wants respect or not but i beleive its my responsibility to show mine. If you deserve anything better than i am ready to give it to you. I will not judge on that circumstance. Perhaps you should learn what it means to respect someone who doesn’t want something.
Am on mobile and voted yes because I misclicked. I meant to vote 🗳 no.
I hope @marlboroza will reconsider his decission soon. This community got a lot of impressive activities from him. Yeah i know scammers are really enjoying his departure news.
In case it was unclear, I don’t respect you.
In addition to the above, you failed to respond to my criticism and instead resorted to ad-hominem attacks.
In addition to the above, you failed to respond to my criticism and instead resorted to ad-hominem attacks.
In case it was unclear, I responded by ridiculing your fallacy-laden concern trolling. Stop derailing every fucking thread with your bullshit, scammer.
Never mind even marlboroza not on DT1 list, currently he is on DT2 list. So his feedback's will visible by default. I have already stated on his thread that I am not going to remove him from my trust list. That means he is always DT1 for me 
.
It's just my suspicion that he want to leave DT1 due to, "part of the problem",if I am not wrong. If everyone like to leave himself then who will solve this part of the problem. Although I respect his decision but I can't accept. So really I want to see him back on DT1, I believe he will change his mind.
. It's just my suspicion that he want to leave DT1 due to, "part of the problem",if I am not wrong. If everyone like to leave himself then who will solve this part of the problem. Although I respect his decision but I can't accept. So really I want to see him back on DT1, I believe he will change his mind.
Perhaps you should learn what it means to respect someone who doesn’t want something.
Yet your faux ethics justifies doxing someone "who doesn’t want [to be doxed]". I don't think I should learn anything from you, scammer.
In addition to the above, you failed to respond to my criticism and instead resorted to ad-hominem attacks.
Perhaps you should learn what it means to respect someone who doesn’t want something.
Yet your faux ethics justifies doxing someone "who doesn’t want [to be doxed]". I don't think I should learn anything from you, scammer.
I voted No only out of respect because he does not want to be on DT. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/remove-marlboroza-me-me-from-dt2-5108783 Here's the whole topic for those who missed it somehow.
I of course would like to see him change his mind and I trust his ratings, but sometime's people just don't want to deal with the hassle. Totally understand and wish him the best.
This is what people don't get about being an active DT member--it is most often more of a pain in the ass than it is rewarding. And while Id like to see marlboroza back on DT1, I certainly understand why he chose not to be. I'm not sure what the DT wannabes are thinking, and you know who I'm talking about. I of course would like to see him change his mind and I trust his ratings, but sometime's people just don't want to deal with the hassle. Totally understand and wish him the best.
Guaranteed they'd either misuse the privilege or wouldn't venture to tag scammers in the face of the inevitable blowback that comes from doing so.
I didn't exclude marlboroza, as I trust his ratings and he doesn't need me to exclude him so as not to be on DT1 anymore.
Remove marlboroza (me, me) from DT2
Go here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
Add this to your trust list:
~marlboroza
Go here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
Add this to your trust list:
~marlboroza
I respect him by including him in DT2. [...]
You have a different definition of respect than I do. Perhaps you should learn what it means to respect someone who doesn’t want something.
Am on mobile and voted yes because I misclicked. I meant to vote 🗳 no.
Jump to: