Pages:
Author

Topic: We will have dollar parity all over again - page 2. (Read 2601 times)

legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Last week I stumbled over one question that I didn't have an answer for, maybe uou guys can help.
Let's assume one Satoshi at some point reaches dollar parity, let's assume further that
I want to purchase a cd worth $10 but with ten Satoshis.
Here is the question: What will be the transaction fee, if the Satoshis
aren't further divisible? If I had to pay one Satoshi for the transaction, that would equal
10% and would probably have me buying it somewhere else. So would the network only charge fees
over a certain transaction value to keep the percentage of the transaction low, or would it simply result in buying or transacting only larger sums in order to keep the transaction fee low.

thx.


My assumption is that if we reached that point (a very good problem to have!) we would all suffer through another hard-fork to add extra decimal places to the protocol. If we failed to do that, it would mean very good things for alt-currencies like litecoin.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Last week I stumbled over one question that I didn't have an answer for, maybe uou guys can help.
Let's assume one Satoshi at some point reaches dollar parity, let's assume further that
I want to purchase a cd worth $10 but with ten Satoshis.
Here is the question: What will be the transaction fee, if the Satoshis
aren't further divisible? If I had to pay one Satoshi for the transaction, that would equal
10% and would probably have me buying it somewhere else. So would the network only charge fees
over a certain transaction value to keep the percentage of the transaction low, or would it simply result in buying or transacting only larger sums in order to keep the transaction fee low.

thx.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
True facts. Plus denominating the price in mBTC helps make the price swings seem less wild. Moving a couple cents up or down in a day seems a lot less unnerving than moving ten or twenty dollars in a day.

Personally, I'm looking forward to dollar parity with uBTC.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Of course, it would be easier to use Bit-cents, but there already mechanism in place for milli-Bitcoins, in Bitcoin-qt at least.  I think we'll get there eventually.

With ordinary stocks, usually, when the issue occur, there is a "split", where each share is split in 10 shares each weighting 10 times less (for example... the number is arbitrary).  So, one day, you have 10 shares at 150$, the next you have 100 shares at 15$.  You have the same amount, but fur us, puny weekly minded humans, it's easier to "deal" with less-than-100$ shares.  So, I guess the same limit does apply for Bitcoins in our minds.  We think that >100$ is too high, not worth buying, etc.  But let's say tomorrow we have 0.1$/mBTC, then one could easily see the potential of mBTC raising to .15$, .2$, etc.
sr. member
Activity: 374
Merit: 250
Tune in to Neocash Radio
I think it should just skip right to milliBTC (mBTC).  Now, one mBTC is trading around 9.2 US cents.  I think this is a fine trading unit.
hero member
Activity: 740
Merit: 500
Hello world!
Well I agree.

I would be better if we called 0.0001 bitcoins "1 bitcoin".

Then we'd leave space for future price-hikes too.
hero member
Activity: 634
Merit: 500
When one Bitcoin hit parity with the dollar it was a big deal. I wasn't here to see it, but I have been looking through articles from back then, and old posts.

I just want to point out that we are once again approaching a dollar parity benchmark. One centibitcoin will (possibly) be worth $1.00 on open exchange.

I would like to suggest a gradual shift in the mentality of Bitcoin pricing. I feel that it is less daunting in the long run to denominate $1000/BTC as $10/cBTC.

While I have no proof to back this claim up, I believe this will ultimately lead to stickier prices. While this may not please speculators, it would lead to a healthier Bitcoin economy, and a better public image.

Thoughts, rebuttals?
Pages:
Jump to: