WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested - page 3.

Mcqueen44

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

Quote from: LovSan on February 23, 2015, 06:05:50 AM

To get about a 100BTC with tax and to steal 5BTC at the end, it's just something. Roll Eyes

Yeah. It would be good ponzi if owner hadn't slolen that 5 btc in the end. Really mean act... Sad

And it would be nice from OP's side to return it to players. At least deposits only.
Everyone will be happy then and meet next version of this ponzi with respect.

LovSan

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

(●´ω´●) Nil de nihilo fit

To get about a 100BTC with tax and to steal 5BTC at the end, it's just something. Roll Eyes

ndnh

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1005

New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit

Quote from: mrTorrio on February 23, 2015, 05:43:18 AM

And it the end it turned to scam, hooray!

Yeah. I get this message when I visit the site:

It was fun while it lasted. Stay tuned for a possible v4 late 2015 or early 2016.
Thank you for making WeeklyPonzi and 24HourPonzi the successes they were. I know the system wasn't always perfect, but many people profited immensely during the lifetime of the sites.

- j (admin of WeeklyPonzi and 24HourPonzi)

Nooooo, they are coming back to scam us again..

mrTorrio

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

And it the end it turned to scam, hooray!

fearlesscat10

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Can't believe this thing is still alive. Does anyonr except OP profit from this anymore? I'm just waiting for v4.

elephantas1

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: prince_k on February 22, 2015, 05:09:25 AM

Why owner of that ponzi took 5 btc from this week's round?

maybe of fees or something or maybe he just wanted to take some money

prince_k

member

Activity: 82

Merit: 10

Why owner of that ponzi took 5 btc from this week's round?

cheako911

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: sickhouse on February 21, 2015, 01:59:06 PM

Quote from: cheako911 on February 21, 2015, 01:48:55 PM

If I were a journalists, or just plain in love with the sound of my own voice, I'd write something like.

Along came Ponzi and it was good. Though some deposits were not confirmed by the bitcoin network. A withdrawal was made by the OP of 5BTC. Then the non-confirmed transactions were spent else where.

Thank god you aren't a journalist Cheesy

Seconded, I only write for perl(1) these days.

sickhouse

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

Quote from: cheako911 on February 21, 2015, 01:48:55 PM

Quote from: Mcqueen44 on February 21, 2015, 01:27:00 PM

Quote from: cheako911 on February 21, 2015, 01:19:46 PM

Quote from: cheako911 on February 20, 2015, 08:06:43 PM

Quote from: Mcqueen44 on February 21, 2015, 01:05:19 PM

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario. The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
7a31ee5c558bc91e437a897f0f248cdaccd39392ff653da88bbda8e9cbdb73b9
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 15PPVtQ25V4EUavNBs2BNbp4ZfjZ8XuVix (1.0002002 BTC - Output)
Outputs:
1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk - (Unspent) 0.99997 BTC
1Exca117ik6cR2mySwfpz4GGrUGRx5p3Eh - (Unspent) 0.0000002 BTC

The spend:
11ec73c7b6b2a65e2d6a99e6497abb0ab4bd565d152c40e8cedea79f09917cfb
Included In Blocks 344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )

While the withdrawal is:
bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878
Included In Block 344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

What is that shit means? Explain in normal human language.

Well, remove the shit and it says...

Quote from: cheako911 on February 20, 2015, 08:06:43 PM

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario. The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 1.0002002
Outputs: 0.99997 BTC 0.0000002 BTC

The spend:
Included In Blocks 344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )

While the withdrawal is:
Included In Block 344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

If I were a journalists, or just plain in love with the sound of my own voice, I'd write something like.

Along came Ponzi and it was good. Though some deposits were not confirmed by the bitcoin network. A withdrawal was made by the OP of 5BTC. Then the non-confirmed transactions were spent else where.

However there is no proof included in the previous statements, they tell a good story, but are empty of any justification. Don't be taken in by sweet talk, only trust the long strings of encoded data. Without the data backing this Ponzi up, they truly would be just scamming everybody.

Thank god you aren't a journalist Cheesy

"THIS JUST IN: A SCAM THATS BEEN KNOWN FOR ALMOST 100 YEARS IS STILL A SCAM!"

cheako911

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: Mcqueen44 on February 21, 2015, 01:27:00 PM

Quote from: cheako911 on February 21, 2015, 01:19:46 PM

Quote from: cheako911 on February 20, 2015, 08:06:43 PM

Quote from: Mcqueen44 on February 21, 2015, 01:05:19 PM

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario. The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
7a31ee5c558bc91e437a897f0f248cdaccd39392ff653da88bbda8e9cbdb73b9
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 15PPVtQ25V4EUavNBs2BNbp4ZfjZ8XuVix (1.0002002 BTC - Output)
Outputs:
1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk - (Unspent) 0.99997 BTC
1Exca117ik6cR2mySwfpz4GGrUGRx5p3Eh - (Unspent) 0.0000002 BTC

The spend:
11ec73c7b6b2a65e2d6a99e6497abb0ab4bd565d152c40e8cedea79f09917cfb
Included In Blocks 344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )

While the withdrawal is:
bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878
Included In Block 344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

What is that shit means? Explain in normal human language.

Well, remove the shit and it says...

Quote from: cheako911 on February 20, 2015, 08:06:43 PM

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario. The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 1.0002002
Outputs: 0.99997 BTC 0.0000002 BTC

The spend:
Included In Blocks 344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )

While the withdrawal is:
Included In Block 344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

If I were a journalists, or just plain in love with the sound of my own voice, I'd write something like.

Along came Ponzi and it was good. Though some deposits were not confirmed by the bitcoin network. A withdrawal was made by the OP of 5BTC. Then the non-confirmed transactions were spent else where.

However there is no proof included in the previous statements, they tell a good story, but are empty of any justification. Don't be taken in by sweet talk, only trust the long strings of encoded data. Without the data backing this Ponzi up, they truly would be just scamming everybody.

Mcqueen44

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

Quote from: cheako911 on February 21, 2015, 01:19:46 PM

Quote from: cheako911 on February 20, 2015, 08:06:43 PM

Quote from: Mcqueen44 on February 21, 2015, 01:05:19 PM

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario. The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
7a31ee5c558bc91e437a897f0f248cdaccd39392ff653da88bbda8e9cbdb73b9
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 15PPVtQ25V4EUavNBs2BNbp4ZfjZ8XuVix (1.0002002 BTC - Output)
Outputs:
1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk - (Unspent) 0.99997 BTC
1Exca117ik6cR2mySwfpz4GGrUGRx5p3Eh - (Unspent) 0.0000002 BTC

The spend:
11ec73c7b6b2a65e2d6a99e6497abb0ab4bd565d152c40e8cedea79f09917cfb
Included In Blocks 344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )

While the withdrawal is:
bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878
Included In Block 344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

What is that shit means? Explain in normal human language.

cheako911

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: cheako911 on February 20, 2015, 08:06:43 PM

Quote from: Mcqueen44 on February 21, 2015, 01:05:19 PM

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario. The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
7a31ee5c558bc91e437a897f0f248cdaccd39392ff653da88bbda8e9cbdb73b9
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 15PPVtQ25V4EUavNBs2BNbp4ZfjZ8XuVix (1.0002002 BTC - Output)
Outputs:
1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk - (Unspent) 0.99997 BTC
1Exca117ik6cR2mySwfpz4GGrUGRx5p3Eh - (Unspent) 0.0000002 BTC

The spend:
11ec73c7b6b2a65e2d6a99e6497abb0ab4bd565d152c40e8cedea79f09917cfb
Included In Blocks 344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )

While the withdrawal is:
bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878
Included In Block 344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

Mcqueen44

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

everlast25

newbie

Activity: 45

Merit: 0

Blockchain will vanish all double spend transactions in around 30 hours and then it will be good time to SEND BACK THAT 5 BTC IN GAME

sevenseas

newbie

Activity: 33

Merit: 0

Quote from: arieq on February 20, 2015, 11:48:01 PM

Quote from: Work2Work on February 20, 2015, 08:12:07 PM

Still dont get, why OP moved coins and when payments be processed... Huh

Payments are not processed because the bank has insufficient fund to pay out, current balance left is 0.9BTC, it should be 5.9BTC if OP didnt steal 5BTC from the bank

So who is next in the line for payment then?
Also 24hour script works fine.

Petpowder

member

Activity: 71

Merit: 10

I doubt it is scam, probably precautionary measures.
What is the point to steal 5 btc when you could steal 60 or 30?
All we have to do is wait.
BTW anywone wrote to OP about those 5 btc?

brizio71

sr. member

Activity: 456

Merit: 250

Blockchain Just Entered The Real World

Quote from: fandango66 on February 21, 2015, 03:09:18 AM

Quote

Payments are not processed because the bank has insufficient fund to pay out, current balance left is 0.9BTC, it should be 5.9BTC if OP didnt steal 5BTC from the bank

https://blockchain.info/tx/bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878

hmm

That's the end !!!

....remember when will be release the version 4 !!!

fandango66

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Quote

Payments are not processed because the bank has insufficient fund to pay out, current balance left is 0.9BTC, it should be 5.9BTC if OP didnt steal 5BTC from the bank

https://blockchain.info/tx/bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878

hmm

arieq

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 256

Quote from: Work2Work on February 20, 2015, 08:12:07 PM

Still dont get, why OP moved coins and when payments be processed... Huh

Payments are not processed because the bank has insufficient fund to pay out, current balance left is 0.9BTC, it should be 5.9BTC if OP didnt steal 5BTC from the bank

cheako911

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: arallmuus on February 20, 2015, 09:34:22 PM

Quote from: padrino on February 20, 2015, 08:27:37 PM

Quote from: cheako911 on February 20, 2015, 08:07:57 PM

Quote from: everlast25 on February 20, 2015, 08:03:41 PM

Quote from: cheako911 on February 20, 2015, 08:01:17 PM

Quote from: resya on February 20, 2015, 07:54:59 PM

Be careful, excalibur (cheako911) is playing double spend attack again, he's trying to recover his lost from previous weekly round

I smell tears getting closer

Those were false starts, they didn't show up in the game.

It looks like the attack was successful, thus this is the problem with going based on confirmed order. Players can double spend if they don't get confirmed in the first block, thus we end up with a single block Ponzi.

Who are you?

Nasty computer hacker.

Or just someone that pays shit for TX fees and his payouts are missed like last week...

if someone keep on repeating this kind of cycle than this game isnt really a ponzi game anymore but instead a cheating game where someone keep on trying to do double spend and tried to cheat by depositing earlier every week, i wonder why people keep on playing in this nasty script

One wonders how much is accidental, luck, scheming?

Topic: WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested - page 3. (Read 115086 times)