Pages:
Author

Topic: WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested - page 94. (Read 115086 times)

full member
Activity: 199
Merit: 100
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
did someone really just deposited 20 BTC ?

It's OP, he really did a nice thing. I'm glad all that talk was not for nothing.

It should have been like 56 BTC and it should have been done like 22 hours ago when it would have made a difference.   
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
can some one write a unbiased review and process of weeklyponzi  I will pay .01 500 word  easy money. 

Not a review but here is my take this week.   (Keep your .01 BTC)

This is extremely risky game to play because the OP isn't committed to fixing his errors.   When the week 2 games started, the scripts for the site did not run correctly and there was an overpayment of more than 60 BTC to early players.   This crippled the game because the OP did not correct it.    It created a much longer queue for payments and killed the week 2 deposits.    Furthermore the OP collect more than 12 BTC in fees.   The OP did ask for people overpaid to return the overpayment and at least one person did but the majority of the overpayment has not been accounted for.  

There are other problems.   Unconfirmed payments are allowed into the payment queue.   This is a problem because some of these unconfirmed payments did not have transaction fees which makes them very unlikely to confirm.   This problem is compounded as these entries are used to make payments.   Those payments won't confirm until after the inputs confirm.   This is a major risk.  

Finally the OP is starting a new 24 hour game.   This pretty much ensures that the people that should have been paid in the week 2 game won't.   No one is going to put BTC in a stale game when there is a fresh game.   This is nothing but greed on the OP part.  

While the OP (WeeklyPonziv3) hasn't outright stole BTC, he hasn't put in the effort to make his game fair or safe.  

* Script problems have been fix but not rectified.
* The game can payout unconfirmed BTC and it is difficult to know when it will confirm.
* New type of game just killing the old game starting today shows greed is the motivation, not fairness.

Example of a transaction using unconfirmed inputs.    https://blockchain.info/tx/24441d3187743729191c5f845beac8b3d0c33e840cbe4d7c8fc70d9629f80066
(These are hard to find because everything is buried in the 1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk address.   Each transaction has to be checked.  Click on the Medium priority to see why it is listed that way.   Anyway that person will probably have to wait sometime to get their 1 BTC, if ever.  

Summary
This appears to be a good concept but a poor implementation and a poor commitment to fairness by the owner make it very risky.    I wanted to believe there was a fairly run Ponzi like game, I have been disappointed.    

thanks.



OP if you are reading this do somehitng about the unconfirmed ones folks that do not send with fee do not pay them out .


Like Dyask stated it messes up the whole game.  again if you guys do not send with proper fee you shouldn't get paid because you screw up the game.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
can some one write a unbiased review and process of weeklyponzi  I will pay .01 500 word  easy money. 

Not a review but here is my take this week.   (Keep your .01 BTC)

This is extremely risky game to play because the OP isn't committed to fixing his errors.   When the week 2 games started, the scripts for the site did not run correctly and there was an overpayment of more than 60 BTC to early players.   This crippled the game because the OP did not correct it.    It created a much longer queue for payments and killed the week 2 deposits.    Furthermore the OP collect more than 12 BTC in fees.   The OP did ask for people overpaid to return the overpayment and at least one person did but the majority of the overpayment has not been accounted for.  

There are other problems.   Unconfirmed payments are allowed into the payment queue.   This is a problem because some of these unconfirmed payments did not have transaction fees which makes them very unlikely to confirm.   This problem is compounded as these entries are used to make payments.   Those payments won't confirm until after the inputs confirm.   This is a major risk.  

Finally the OP is starting a new 24 hour game.   This pretty much ensures that the people that should have been paid in the week 2 game won't.   No one is going to put BTC in a stale game when there is a fresh game.   This is nothing but greed on the OP part.  

While the OP (WeeklyPonziv3) hasn't outright stole BTC, he hasn't put in the effort to make his game fair or safe.  

* Script problems have been fix but not rectified.
* The game can payout unconfirmed BTC and it is difficult to know when it will confirm.
* New type of game just killing the old game starting today shows greed is the motivation, not fairness.

Example of a transaction using unconfirmed inputs.    https://blockchain.info/tx/24441d3187743729191c5f845beac8b3d0c33e840cbe4d7c8fc70d9629f80066
(These are hard to find because everything is buried in the 1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk address.   Each transaction has to be checked.  Click on the Medium priority to see why it is listed that way.   Anyway that person will probably have to wait sometime to get their 1 BTC, if ever.  

Summary
This appears to be a good concept but a poor implementation and a poor commitment to fairness by the owner make it very risky.    I wanted to believe there was a fairly run Ponzi like game, I have been disappointed.    

Not sure if you saw but 30 mins ago the OP sent 20 BTC to help catch up. Pluss the 6.5 that was given back.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
can some one write a unbiased review and process of weeklyponzi  I will pay .01 500 word  easy money.  

Not a review but here is my take this week.   (Keep your .01 BTC)

Game scripts mostly seem to work and the payout fee is reasonable.   It is nice that it is automatic.   Week 1 game was a huge success.

This is extremely risky game to play because the OP isn't committed to fixing his errors.   When the week 2 games started, the scripts for the site did not run correctly and there was an overpayment of more than 60 BTC to early players.   This crippled the game because the OP did not correct it.    It created a much longer queue for payments and killed the week 2 deposits.    Furthermore the OP collect more than 12 BTC in fees.   The OP did ask for people overpaid to return the overpayment and at least one person did but the majority of the overpayment has not been accounted for.  

UPDATE:  Owner added 20 BTC of his own money.   Another user returned 6.5 BTC of the overpayment.   This is a good if late start to repairing the damage.   However the site has been shutdown for lack of a working IPN service.  So things don't look that good for the week 2 game.  

UPDATE 2: First 24 game was shutdown by ipn service going down.  The Ponzi owner refunded most of the payments.  The ones not refunded yet were probably held because they were confirmed yet.  (See right below.)   I think it is likely they will be refunded too as the trust is trying to be built.   

There are other problems.   Unconfirmed payments are allowed into the payment queue.   This is a problem because some of these unconfirmed payments did not have transaction fees which makes them very unlikely to confirm.   This problem is compounded as these entries are used to make payments.   Those payments won't confirm until after the inputs confirm.   This is a major risk.  

Finally the OP is starting a new 24 hour game.   This pretty much ensures that the people that should have been paid in the week 2 game won't.   No one is going to put BTC in a stale game when there is a fresh game.   This is nothing but greed on the OP part.  

While the OP (WeeklyPonziv3) hasn't outright stole BTC, he hasn't put in the effort to make his game fair or safe.  

* Script problems have been fix but not rectified.  (UPDATE: Partially rectified)
* The game can payout unconfirmed BTC and it is difficult to know when it will confirm.
* New type of game just killing the old game starting today shows greed is the motivation, not fairness.

Example of a transaction using unconfirmed inputs.    https://blockchain.info/tx/24441d3187743729191c5f845beac8b3d0c33e840cbe4d7c8fc70d9629f80066
(These are hard to find because everything is buried in the 1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk address.   Each transaction has to be checked.  Click on the Medium priority to see why it is listed that way.   Anyway that person will probably have to wait sometime to get their 1 BTC, if ever.  

Summary
This appears to be a good concept but a poor implementation and a poor commitment to fairness by the owner make it very risky.    I wanted to believe there was a fairly run Ponzi like game, I have been disappointed so far.   However, that owner has not ran off when they could have with a lot of BTC.   I don't think this is a scam it is just still a rough draft of what it needs to be.  
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
I will send 10BTC in first 20 seconds of 24 hour ponzi.

Start is 25 Minutes from now.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Woot lets get this babys started!!!
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 500
Yeah I have been noticing a number of transactions being paid without deposits coming in.

I just received a payout from a deposit that was about 20+ BTC down the line. There are now about 10 other paid orders above me.

Got to hand it to the dev. Im sure that not many of the Multipayed people returned there coins, at least some of this has to be coming from his own pocket.

If i would had been gambling earlier then i would gamble a bit with the double paid coins and after that return the double paid coins. Anyway i didn't join in time.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000
https://www.bitworks.io
Yeah I have been noticing a number of transactions being paid without deposits coming in.

I just received a payout from a deposit that was about 20+ BTC down the line. There are now about 10 other paid orders above me.

Got to hand it to the dev. Im sure that not many of the Multipayed people returned there coins, at least some of this has to be coming from his own pocket.

Only one person did and that was pushed out earlier, this came from the OPs wallet..
hero member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 500
Yeah I have been noticing a number of transactions being paid without deposits coming in.

I just received a payout from a deposit that was about 20+ BTC down the line. There are now about 10 other paid orders above me.

Got to hand it to the dev. Im sure that not many of the Multipayed people returned there coins, at least some of this has to be coming from his own pocket.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 500
Well with 6 days remaining, if it goes like week #1 there is another 400-500 BTC to play
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
full member
Activity: 257
Merit: 100
Ok, I think his honesty its not in discussion anymore.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
and in 50 minutes that 24 hour ponzi will start, hmz Wink

Just a guess. But I think that will be really quick maybe a few hours and then people will take that money made and send it here. But just a guess.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 500
and in 50 minutes that 24 hour ponzi will start, hmz Wink
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
did someone really just deposited 20 BTC ?

It's OP, he really did a nice thing. I'm glad all that talk was not for nothing.

I was surprised by it. Glad he did it. People have to now realize he is really trying to run an honest game here.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
did someone really just deposited 20 BTC ?

The OP did. It is BTC that is not to be repaid. It is purely to help make up for his problem he had with his api/scropt last night. He over paid a bunch of people cause the game to fall behind.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
lol
op reinvested his money
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
did someone really just deposited 20 BTC ?

It's OP, he really did a nice thing. I'm glad all that talk was not for nothing.
Pages:
Jump to: