Funny how those westerners who 'don't know jack shit' have been going full steam ahead while fools like those fillipinos delude themselves thinking they are 'richer in experience'. Is there a need for further solid concrete proof in this world of their desperate, eager myopic thinking to comfort themselves with delusional sense of 'moral, mental superiority'?
As someone who most definitely wouldn't be mistaken for a 'westerner' (whatever the fuck fools think that means
), I find this kind of thinking by non-western people to be hilarious.
Also, 'ignorance' and 'racism'. LOL
I've been around the world and actually lived, not visited or stayed as a foreigner or outsider in various places and among different people. People are naive little fucks when they bitch about western nations being 'racists' or 'ignorant'. West is the west, and white people's countries, just as africa is for blacks, saudi arabia is for arabs, china and east asia for asians, india for indians, and so forth.
Deal with it. Those who deny this or claim their racial background takes precedence over whites in the west are no different than anyone who claim black africans do not belong in africa, indians do not belong in india, or chinese are not in possession of china.
It's a given that those who do not fit or otherwise proclaim identity that is separate and different from the central majority to be not given the same treatment as others. You do not get to keep a dual identity.
Now, let's posit a question: What specific argument, one that does not rely on wishful thinking, can you bring up to objectively support the idea that any non-westerner has attitude different then what was posted by the OP? Because I will gladly demonstrate how ignorant you are