Wha Do You Think About Nuclear Energy?

arbitrage

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: aardvark15 on March 08, 2016, 07:58:44 PM

I think that nuclear energy could be better for the environment than fossil fuels as long as there are strict regulations on nuclear power plants like in the US and unlike Japan. I think it's a cleaner energy source. However, solar and wind I think would be even better.

Quote from: Hganz11 on March 06, 2016, 07:14:51 PM

Idk many people say it's safer for the environment and I heard its good but I haven't read much into it

Did you really investigate how Nuclear power plant works?
Where and how is waste dumped, how much waste they have "produced over time"?
What happening with this waste over time and how can influence environment and on heath of humans.
How anyone can defend using of nuclear power after Fukushima disaster..
This was not incident this is nuclear holocaust, and victims will be known in future.

aardvark15

hero member

Activity: 994

Merit: 510

I think that nuclear energy could be better for the environment than fossil fuels as long as there are strict regulations on nuclear power plants like in the US and unlike Japan. I think it's a cleaner energy source. However, solar and wind I think would be even better.

Batmanvsduecare

full member

Activity: 175

Merit: 100

Good if all people gonna use it but i think lower class people gonna catch up to that hardly.

Hganz11

jr. member

Activity: 58

Merit: 10

Idk many people say it's safer for the environment and I heard its good but I haven't read much into it

stevejab

newbie

Activity: 39

Merit: 0

Quote from: magnific61 on February 28, 2016, 12:52:42 PM

Please tell your opinions about nuclear energy, effection of environment, natural energy sources and fossil fuels.

Nuclear energy is a great source of energy, more than enough energy for our needs (that's what i think). BUT its effect to the environment is very huge and it's very hard to dispose those waste since those uranium will decay into leads i think. So nuclear energy is a bit shaky for a primary energy source. As for natural energy, these resources are limited and yet people squander these resource for no reason.

Tech Mania

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

I think its safer and modern technology

A0LA

member

Activity: 67

Merit: 10

Quote from: Cynocephalus on March 03, 2016, 04:33:37 PM

Quote from: A0LA on March 03, 2016, 02:49:03 PM

But i'm not sure that nuclear power have no future, I think we need just find who improve this one Wink

Probably have future but need more research and new technology.
Also safety and protection must be on first place not as before.

I'm agree with U, security is not enough important but it should be Undecided

Cynocephalus

member

Activity: 119

Merit: 100

Quote from: A0LA on March 03, 2016, 02:49:03 PM

But i'm not sure that nuclear power have no future, I think we need just find who improve this one Wink

Probably have future but need more research and new technology.
Also safety and protection must be on first place not as before.

A0LA

member

Activity: 67

Merit: 10

But i'm not sure that nuclear power have no future, I think we need just find who improve this one Wink

A0LA

member

Activity: 67

Merit: 10

Quote from: arbitrage on March 02, 2016, 02:32:45 AM

Quote from: darkangel11 on March 01, 2016, 12:13:43 PM

I have nothing against nuclear plants. It's a cheap energy after all. Nuclear waste could be launched into space towards the sun, but it's too expensive for our politicians, who prefer to bury it for the time being hoping they won't live to see the consequences. Very smart of them.

launching missiles with contaminated contents?This is suicide!
Risking greatly, createing major ecological disaster if lanch faild, also those space travels are not cheap.
What to do with waste is real question, thets is why nuclear power have no future.

I'm okay with U it's not a good idea to launch into space towards the sun except if you want that the space becomes a waste ^^

arbitrage

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: darkangel11 on March 01, 2016, 12:13:43 PM

I have nothing against nuclear plants. It's a cheap energy after all. Nuclear waste could be launched into space towards the sun, but it's too expensive for our politicians, who prefer to bury it for the time being hoping they won't live to see the consequences. Very smart of them.

launching missiles with contaminated contents?This is suicide!
Risking greatly, createing major ecological disaster if lanch faild, also those space travels are not cheap.
What to do with waste is real question, thets is why nuclear power have no future.

darkangel11

legendary

Activity: 2296

Merit: 1335

Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com

I have nothing against nuclear plants. It's a cheap energy after all. Nuclear waste could be launched into space towards the sun, but it's too expensive for our politicians, who prefer to bury it for the time being hoping they won't live to see the consequences. Very smart of them.

Hizzmoot

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 251

Its still safer than this

Its pretty dangerous to produce it. What I mean is I met people that produce it. health problems- you can not work more than 2-3 years with it otherwise you will have pretty bad problems with your health. And if not government supporting it would be completely non profitable to set it near highways

And I wont say about these all birds cases and so on

arbitrage

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

"There are some drawbacks to thorium fuel cycles, but they are highly technical. For instance, thorium reactors have been criticized as potentially having more neutron leak compared with conventional reactors. More neutron leak means more shielding and other protection is needed for workers at the power plant"
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2015/01/16/thorium-future-nuclear-energy/#.VtVxw7QrLIU

"The advantages of thorium are purely theoretical, he told BBC News."
"The technology development is decades in the future. Instead I think we should focus on developing renewable technology - for example offshore wind technology - which I think has a huge potential to develop.”
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-24638816

After all there is no other super element that can be used instead of uranium.
I don't know why people don't realize there is great lobby, standing behind all this. Wink

fizzling

member

Activity: 63

Merit: 10

Quote from: Vika NSFW on February 28, 2016, 01:01:31 PM

Is perfect for Electric Vehicles and cheap.
Give no CO2

Dont you think they take TOO much time to charge?
After all time is money

poptok1

hero member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 756

Bobby Fischer was right

The future belongs to fusion.
Advantages of nuclear fusion versus nuclear fission
Currently the generation of electricity in nuclear reactors is done by nuclear fission reactions. For the moment, nuclear fusion is not valid to generate electric power. Once developed, if nuclear fusion is really practicable, it will provide great advantages over nuclear fission:
-Virtually inexhaustible sources of fuel.
-No accidents in the reactor due to the chain reactions that occur in fissions.
-The waste generated will be much less radioactive.

TheButterZone

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1031

RIP Mommy

It can be done safely, but we can't have nice things, so governments force reactors to be built on fault lines and in tsunami zones, or not at all.

arbitrage

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: Lethn on March 01, 2016, 06:07:44 AM

Quote from: Invulner on February 29, 2016, 09:12:48 PM

I think it's the best energy source available. It is pretty safe, and environmentally friendly. I think people are just paranoid of nuclear energy being unsafe.

How many craters will it take for you to realise that's a completely stupid statement to make?

Yes this can be done this way.
But at some moment we will have leakage when corrosion win this battle.

Or like this.

http://hubpages.com/politics/Dumping-of-Nuclear-Waste-In-the-Oceans

Lethn

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Invulner on February 29, 2016, 09:12:48 PM

I think it's the best energy source available. It is pretty safe, and environmentally friendly. I think people are just paranoid of nuclear energy being unsafe.

How many craters will it take for you to realise that's a completely stupid statement to make?

arbitrage

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: Vika NSFW on February 29, 2016, 07:54:27 AM

The cost of waste recovery is just in energy price.

I don't know why people don't read how the is this bad for health?
Even if incident never occurs this still have problems with storing waste.
We still don't have such technology for safe use of Nuclear energy!

Topic: Wha Do You Think About Nuclear Energy? (Read 1502 times)