I've tried BISQ of course, that is decentralized but my point was, Localbitcoins is still P2P, it never claimed to be decentralized. I think people get confused by centralized and decentralized. I like the idea but I don't deny that centralized services are also P2P.
Peer to peer trading means there are two parties directly buying and selling amongst themselves without the involvement of central authority in the process, thus this is where decentralization comes in. If a third party is involved, then that is not P2P.
If you still remember how localbitcoins operated, the truth is that once you deposited the funds to their addresses, it was now their Bitcoin and not yours. You simply had figures showing in your account that you have 0.1 or 10 BTC, but the fact was the Bitcoins were lying in their hotwallets, and therefore they were the Central Authority and had complete control over the deposited assets.
Once you carried out the trade to sell the Bitcoins, it was Trader 1 ----> LocalBitcoins ----> Trader 2. Sincelery, how do you still consider that to be Peer (trader 1) to Peer (trader 2)