Why are you considering Ethereum and NEO as an ICO? They are both individual protocols that run on the blockchain, just like bitcoin, so they should be considered alts and not ICO or tokens. An ICO normally runs inside protocols that provide smart contracts or similar things. We normally associate ICOs to Ethereum, although there are more altcoins out there (like NEO), that provide ways to create ICOs that have their own tokens.
Maybe I have this wrong, but I really think there is a big difference between alts and ICOs, so if you want to create a list of ICOs (Pundi, ArtToken, Enjin coin, etc), then you shouldn't mix them with alts. As for your question, I like those ICOs I've mentioned, and I also like filecoin and crypto card ICOs (like TenX, Centra and Monaco). They all provide good products with real use, and that's why I consider them successful.
Because NEO(antshares) and ETH both had an ICO.
ICO means initial coin offering. It can be anything. Ethereum held an ICO before their platform got boosted by so many investors that drove up the price. All the ones that you've listed are indeed ICOs, they're just ongoing. ETH's ICO has ended long ago with great profits for investors.
OP, it's surprising to see NXT on top of the list. However for all the projects you mentioned, it's still too early to judge especially EOS and Bancor imho.
