Topic: What! btc-e leading in volume. (Read 2869 times)
here is the reason
quoting my brilliant self:
Consider the following scenarios:
1) 100,000 btc 24hr volume by 10,000 traders, with 90% of trades by 9,000 traders; and
2) 500,000 btc 24hr volume by 100 traders, with 90% of trades by 10 traders.
A noob investor/trader is likely to consider high volume as an indication of high demand, especially after a calm period. In 2), the few major traders can manipulate the price around at will.
This should be common sense.
1) 100,000 btc 24hr volume by 10,000 traders, with 90% of trades by 9,000 traders; and
2) 500,000 btc 24hr volume by 100 traders, with 90% of trades by 10 traders.
A noob investor/trader is likely to consider high volume as an indication of high demand, especially after a calm period. In 2), the few major traders can manipulate the price around at will.
This should be common sense.
So the idea is to manipulate the volume on BTC-E in order to drive the price down on exchanges with greater depth such as MTGox or BitStamp?
You are stupid.
There is a reason this guy's ignore button glows brightly............
Russians > Everyone else.
In all seriousness though, the growth in volume probably has more to do with the Altcoin crash than anything else.
In all seriousness though, the growth in volume probably has more to do with the Altcoin crash than anything else.
I trade there. The walls are usually fake, but sometimes, they get market ordered through before they can be pulled. That's fun to watch. Seen it happen several times the past couple days. Does seem a bit high though. 25k wouldn't have surprised me, though.
Boris, The Sneaky fucking russian!
Just a thought, given btc-e has been top of the volume table for nigh on a day now: OP, How's about changing the title of this thread to Wall Observer: BTC-e wall movement tracker?
I kinda like having mainly headed to the gox wall thread for a year or so now, over the last couple of months flipping between the various wall threads now that the era of gox's dominance appears to be over. It would be nice to have a btc-e one too (unless there's one already I've missed out on)?
I kinda like having mainly headed to the gox wall thread for a year or so now, over the last couple of months flipping between the various wall threads now that the era of gox's dominance appears to be over. It would be nice to have a btc-e one too (unless there's one already I've missed out on)?
You do understand arbitrage trading?
Its instant cash, the more you invest the larger the profit.
On the other hand the rate hasnt moved much.
Maybe they are going Chinese style and modifying their API.
Its instant cash, the more you invest the larger the profit.
On the other hand the rate hasnt moved much.
Maybe they are going Chinese style and modifying their API.
There wouldnt be 20k coins on BTC-E to arb.
You do understand arbitrage trading?
Its instant cash, the more you invest the larger the profit.
On the other hand the rate hasnt moved much.
Maybe they are going Chinese style and modifying their API.
Its instant cash, the more you invest the larger the profit.
On the other hand the rate hasnt moved much.
Maybe they are going Chinese style and modifying their API.
Whats so surprising about that?
They are 20%+ below Gox obviously there is some arbitrage trading going on.
They are 20%+ below Gox obviously there is some arbitrage trading going on.
...arb traders... dont make 20k of volume.. lmao
Whats so surprising about that?
They are 20%+ below Gox obviously there is some arbitrage trading going on.
They are 20%+ below Gox obviously there is some arbitrage trading going on.
quoting my brilliant self:
Consider the following scenarios:
1) 100,000 btc 24hr volume by 10,000 traders, with 90% of trades by 9,000 traders; and
2) 500,000 btc 24hr volume by 100 traders, with 90% of trades by 10 traders.
A noob investor/trader is likely to consider high volume as an indication of high demand, especially after a calm period. In 2), the few major traders can manipulate the price around at will.
This should be common sense.
1) 100,000 btc 24hr volume by 10,000 traders, with 90% of trades by 9,000 traders; and
2) 500,000 btc 24hr volume by 100 traders, with 90% of trades by 10 traders.
A noob investor/trader is likely to consider high volume as an indication of high demand, especially after a calm period. In 2), the few major traders can manipulate the price around at will.
This should be common sense.
So the idea is to manipulate the volume on BTC-E in order to drive the price down on exchanges with greater depth such as MTGox or BitStamp?
You are stupid.
Not sure. I didn't actually read anything in this thread, other than the title.
The volume increase I mentioned occurred weeks ago. It is not in that chart.
It's not that BTC-E volume has gone up, it's that Bitstamp/Gox/BTCChina volume has gone down. BTC-E is catching up in terms of prices, so this is to be expected.
False. The actual volume number has gone way up, not just the ratio. One day they were doing 8Kbtc per day on average and then it shot up to 20K-45K per day.
I do not see anything suspicious in this chart of BTC-E volume over the past few days. This looks very normal to me, given the Bitcoin trend reversal.
It's not that BTC-E volume has gone up, it's that Bitstamp/Gox/BTCChina volume has gone down. BTC-E is catching up in terms of prices, so this is to be expected.
False. The actual volume number has gone way up, not just the ratio. One day they were doing 8Kbtc per day on average and then it shot up to 20K-45K per day.
It's not that BTC-E volume has gone up, it's that Bitstamp/Gox/BTCChina volume has gone down. BTC-E is catching up in terms of prices, so this is to be expected.
I don't think they have dark pools, but I also have never heard reports in the past of them faking volume.
I do, however, sometimes get the impression that there are orders in the book that are not listed. Sometimes I make an order, say to buy 10 BTC, filling the top 10 orders in the book and then, to my surprise I find it buys 10 BTC but filling only the top 2 orders, which were never even near 10 BTC total.
Bitstamps API was broken for nearly a day, perhaps the BTCe volume is not so much increased, but rather bitstamp has decreased. Or some customers switched.
quoting my brilliant self:
Consider the following scenarios:
1) 100,000 btc 24hr volume by 10,000 traders, with 90% of trades by 9,000 traders; and
2) 500,000 btc 24hr volume by 100 traders, with 90% of trades by 10 traders.
A noob investor/trader is likely to consider high volume as an indication of high demand, especially after a calm period. In 2), the few major traders can manipulate the price around at will.
This should be common sense.
1) 100,000 btc 24hr volume by 10,000 traders, with 90% of trades by 9,000 traders; and
2) 500,000 btc 24hr volume by 100 traders, with 90% of trades by 10 traders.
A noob investor/trader is likely to consider high volume as an indication of high demand, especially after a calm period. In 2), the few major traders can manipulate the price around at will.
This should be common sense.
So the idea is to manipulate the volume on BTC-E in order to drive the price down on exchanges with greater depth such as MTGox or BitStamp?
You are stupid.
quoting my brilliant self:
Consider the following scenarios:
1) 100,000 btc 24hr volume by 10,000 traders, with 90% of trades by 9,000 traders; and
2) 500,000 btc 24hr volume by 100 traders, with 90% of trades by 10 traders.
A noob investor/trader is likely to consider high volume as an indication of high demand, especially after a calm period. In 2), the few major traders can manipulate the price around at will.
This should be common sense.
1) 100,000 btc 24hr volume by 10,000 traders, with 90% of trades by 9,000 traders; and
2) 500,000 btc 24hr volume by 100 traders, with 90% of trades by 10 traders.
A noob investor/trader is likely to consider high volume as an indication of high demand, especially after a calm period. In 2), the few major traders can manipulate the price around at will.
This should be common sense.
So the idea is to manipulate the volume on BTC-E in order to drive the price down on exchanges with greater depth such as MTGox or BitStamp?
You are stupid.
quoting my brilliant self:
Consider the following scenarios:
1) 100,000 btc 24hr volume by 10,000 traders, with 90% of trades by 9,000 traders; and
2) 500,000 btc 24hr volume by 100 traders, with 90% of trades by 10 traders.
A noob investor/trader is likely to consider high volume as an indication of high demand, especially after a calm period. In 2), the few major traders can manipulate the price around at will.
This should be common sense.
1) 100,000 btc 24hr volume by 10,000 traders, with 90% of trades by 9,000 traders; and
2) 500,000 btc 24hr volume by 100 traders, with 90% of trades by 10 traders.
A noob investor/trader is likely to consider high volume as an indication of high demand, especially after a calm period. In 2), the few major traders can manipulate the price around at will.
This should be common sense.
So the idea is to manipulate the volume on BTC-E in order to drive the price down on exchanges with greater depth such as MTGox or BitStamp?
quoting my brilliant self:
Consider the following scenarios:
1) 100,000 btc 24hr volume by 10,000 traders, with 90% of trades by 9,000 traders; and
2) 500,000 btc 24hr volume by 100 traders, with 90% of trades by 10 traders.
A noob investor/trader is likely to consider high volume as an indication of high demand, especially after a calm period. In 2), the few major traders can manipulate the price around at will.
This should be common sense.
1) 100,000 btc 24hr volume by 10,000 traders, with 90% of trades by 9,000 traders; and
2) 500,000 btc 24hr volume by 100 traders, with 90% of trades by 10 traders.
A noob investor/trader is likely to consider high volume as an indication of high demand, especially after a calm period. In 2), the few major traders can manipulate the price around at will.
This should be common sense.
In times like these triangular arbitrage between LTC/BTC/USD and EUR/USD/BTC can go a long way.
Jump to: