Pages:
Author

Topic: What can happen next time due to a lack of proper knowledge about Bitcoin? - page 3. (Read 1298 times)

member
Activity: 66
Merit: 5
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
The Banking system have failed the people in so many ways, it is about time that there are some payback for them. In the previous economic crisis, Banks were bailed out by tax payers money and we just had to take it up the a$$.

A lot of industries have been disrupted by newer technologies and they just had to adapt or die... so the Banks just have to do the same. Let's forget about them, like they forgot about us.. when they harmed us.
The intention of Satoshi in creating bitcoin is not to take avenge or revenge on what you believe banks did to us (those you have lost to the banking system) rather it was for the simple purpose of financial freedom and free from central control by governments.
I don't think banks will be destroyed but it will have to adapt to the new technology and keep it activities if banks are going to be wiped out all over the world it will take years, this year's might be up to a centenary or more or less. Though the disadvantages of banks over shadow the advantages but that should don't make anyone to forget the value it aided to human life.
sr. member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 326
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
3: Many developing or underdeveloped countries (especially those with low leverage) will consider cryptocurrency a curse rather than a blessing due to their lack of proper understanding of its importance.

Cryptocurrency is now getting acceptable and those who don't know yet will surely go towards learning about its characteristic because it is a reality that whenever new things come into use then people first start investigating about it then use their money for investment.

Those were the people of past were innocent who don't understand well but put money into anything but now age is modern and also people are modified according to era so they will not think bitcoin as a curse but they will realize its benefits. Like you have seen that instead of having strict regulations in some country people are still buying more and more bitcoin because they know that a day will come when their country will accept bitcoin so I think that it is will of everyone to be educated about bitcoin as they already know that importance of bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
OP's question is like the crypto will become world currency in a blip and everyone who don't know about crypto and is not very educated will lost their job and become unemployed.
When you say crypto, what is crypto anyhow?  Does that expression mean much of anything unless you place it into some kind of a bitcoin context?, and if you are talking about bitcoin then why not say bitcoin at some point rather than using vague and imprecise language regarding how some kind of a supposed crypto has any kind of meaning without somehow figuring out how you consider the role of bitcoin to be within whatever it is that you might be saying...
I do understand that most people do not know where to classify bitcoin or let me say the difference between bitcoin and cryptocurrencies which always results in given the place of bitcoin to cryptocurrency, and yes I won't apportion any blame to those people who are interchanging the words or misinterpreting the knowledge of bitcoin to cryptocurrency.

It is not up to you to clarify what someone else might have meant when they are using vague and meaningless language, but surely you can accept that people speak (write) with sloppiness if you like to live in a world in which people are either not clarifying what they mean or purposefully speaking in vaguenesses in order to mislead others.

Sure, sometimes whatever that person said may well have been sufficiently clear and/or unimportant, and sure sometimes their use of vague, meaningless and misleading language is due to inadvertance rather than purposefulness, but still it does not mean that any of us should accept such vagueness, even if you personally choose such course of action and/or choose to defend that others use such sloppiness in their speaking/writing.

Cryptocurrency most at times are all classified together including those shitcoin which are more volatile and riskier in terms of investment which might not know their future plan or a pre-proposed plan that would leads to the utility of such projects/tokens or even generalizing overall plans, that was why many cryptocurrencies today that was introduced 2 year to 8 years ago are no place to be founds till date excepts for few that  managed to survived those hard and dying times, at then I usually get most of the updates on twitter which is X and some of them on the local TV news...

Of course, there are a lot fewer damages when you clarify your terms and clarify what you mean when you use your crypto currency term or whatever term that you choose to use and however you choose to define it.. so part of the problem is resolved when you at least clarify what you mean by the term, even if others might not agree with your definition, they at least have some better ideas about what it is that you are trying to say.

... But in bitcoin words we can say the volatility doesn't still breaks down the purpose and the mission of bitcoin to reason it was created till date, people often term bitcoin to Cryptocurrency because that is their overall knowledge and exposure to how they knows and get information concerning bitcoin that is why we must go for knowledge to know what are venturing into.

Fair enough.. The nature of bitcoin is not affected regarding what it is called, but it is still nice to know what people mean, so if they throw out a term like "crypto" or "cryptocurrency" and they are talking about bitcoin, then why not just clarify bitcoin is what they are talking about, so if they use the term crypto, then we might not know if they are talking about bitcoin or something else... if they use the term crypto because they are talking about something.. maybe even including bitcoin in what they are talking about, it still seems better many of the times to say what it is that they are talking about rather than leaving it vague.. and sure sometimes there can be purposefulness in terms of leaving thing vague.. and in some contexts it might not make a difference.. but then if we are talking about public threads, then we have a whole bunch of potential people who might be reading such communications.. and not every one has time to be trying to get clarification, but I find it is a decently good thing to either attempt to clarify or at least to point out that what the person had posted has ambiguities and potential misleadingness contained therein.
hero member
Activity: 1316
Merit: 561
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
`
Of course I agree with your point of view. Bitcoin is not regulated by governments around the world which is why governments around the world cannot control it. If this Bitcoin was controlled by a government then surely Bitcoin would run in a regulated manner. I am a Bangladeshi Bitcoin is still banned in my country. There are several reasons why Bitcoin is banned in my country, one of the reasons being that most people in my country don't know about Bitcoin. Also my country is not very developed as an underdeveloped country it is better not to legalize Bitcoin in this country. However, two MP(Member of Parliament) in my country's parliament spoke about the legitimacy of Bitcoin, but now no MPs speak about the legitimacy of Bitcoin. However, even though Bitcoin is not legal in this country, various government employees and thousands of young people who work in Bitcoin are using Bitcoin freely. As Bitcoin is not legal in my country, there is no problem administratively, but sometimes due to money laundering, some young people are brought under administrative control. Moreover, even though Bitcoin is not legal in my country, we are using it safely.
I agree with your point of view on Bitcoin's regulation, or lack thereof, by governments. This brings up an important point about cryptocurrencies: they are not connected to standard financial systems. For countries like Bangladesh, this freedom is especially hard to handle, even though it sounds desirable. Its interesting that people are still using Bitcoin even though its been banned. Wonderful human

I can relate to what you said about people in less developed places. Education could make a big difference. Imagine that it were easier for people in Bangladesh to find information about cryptocurrencies. Informed decision-making could be improved by giving people more power. Money laundering and other problems with administration are real risks, but they also create chances for new rules to be made. Could Bangladesh create a new set of rules that recognizes Bitcoin's promise while also keeping it from being abused? Its possible that this method could lead to a more balanced and open-minded mindset about cryptocurrencies.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 800
OP's question is like the crypto will become world currency in a blip and everyone who don't know about crypto and is not very educated will lost their job and become unemployed.
When you say crypto, what is crypto anyhow?  Does that expression mean much of anything unless you place it into some kind of a bitcoin context?, and if you are talking about bitcoin then why not say bitcoin at some point rather than using vague and imprecise language regarding how some kind of a supposed crypto has any kind of meaning without somehow figuring out how you consider the role of bitcoin to be within whatever it is that you might be saying...

I do understand that most people do not know where to classify bitcoin or let me say the difference between bitcoin and cryptocurrencies which always results in given the place of bitcoin to cryptocurrency, and yes I won't apportion any blame to those people who are interchanging the words or misinterpreting the knowledge of bitcoin to cryptocurrency.
Cryptocurrency most at times are all classified together including those shitcoin which are more volatile and riskier in terms of investment which might not know their future plan or a pre-proposed plan that would leads to the utility of such projects/tokens or even generalizing overall plans, that was why many cryptocurrencies today that was introduced 2 year to 8 years ago are no place to be founds till date excepts for few that  managed to survived those hard and dying times, at then I usually get most of the updates on twitter which is X and some of them on the local TV news...
... But in bitcoin words we can say the volatility doesn't still breaks down the purpose and the mission of bitcoin to reason it was created till date, people often term bitcoin to Cryptocurrency because that is their overall knowledge and exposure to how they knows and get information concerning bitcoin that is why we must go for knowledge to know what are venturing into.
copper member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 539
LuckyDiamond.io - FLAT 50% Deposit Bonus!
It’s not at all possible for Bitcoins to completely take over the fiat. The reason is very simple. Bitcoins are limited in numbers. Hence majority of the people consider it as a digital asset rather than any currency. Moreover due to the decentralised nature of the coin, it cannot be controlled, hence government will impose the traditional banking methods only. Moreover we are also in very early stage to think something like this. Let’s practically see things and let’s progress slowly.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 195
Buy on Amazon with Crypto
.

Secondly, @OP, even if what you said is possible, those who lack knowledge of Bitcoin, blockchain technology, and other cryptocurrency will definitely learn about the technology and its user case. The use of bitcoin or cryptocurrency is not very sophisticated. Even bank workers studied at the university for some years and archived their degrees; that's also how people will learn about whatever they need to know about blockchain technology. If necessary.
Fuck crypto, I think Bitcoin is what is being referred to here and although we can't deny the fact that there is a possibility of Bitcoin becoming globally accepted of which is just a small percent of you ask me but I believe we can't write out anything in the world of possiblity as I believe no one would have taught that Bitcoin would get this massive adoption and attention prior to the first time it was created.

I believe as Bitcoin continues to grow more person or government would have no option than to join the queue on the diversification of its use as the way El Salvador have done although it's still in testing phase but I believe this sends a statement that Bitcoin use and government is actually possible even if they don't accept to the phase of making it a legal tender, learning about it more to properly know the areas which they can benefit won't be a bad idea and this has also started with my nation that first posed a restriction on the use of Bitcoin, now that decision has been reviewed back and plans to start learning more on Blockchain technology has put in place by the government so as they can know the area of which they can all benefit mutually from Bitcoin tech. That's certainly a growing and big step up in terms of Bitcoin and it's relation also with government if you ask me .

@Mr. Suevie, Don't get me quite off. I always used to say to myself that despite the fact that the governments of most countries are against Bitcoin and don't want it to be widely adopted by the citizens, that doesn't actually mean that some of those government officials are not investing in Bitcoin secretly. Of course, some of the government appointees, in one way or another, might be into Bitcoin secretly, but they don't want to make any effort to make Bitcoin a legal tender.

Bitcoin is a decentralized asset, and it was never created to become centralized. Currently, we know how many centralized exchanges out there and can't be compared to the decentralized exchange, and many new investors in Bitcoin are becoming more familiar with and feeling very secure with most of these centralized exchanges. Normally, you know that all those exchanges were given licenses of operation by the same government. So, don't you think that if the government decides to begin ceasing people's Bitcoin assets, they can possibly force those centralized exchanges to give them KYC details of customers  and the amount of Bitcoin they have purchased?

If such a situation begins to take place, and the government can begin to watch and monitor every user's Bitcoin wallet and the amount of transaction that is going on in it, then Bitcoin transactions will not really be that secure in the sense that if you make a withdrawal of any amount, the government will quickly know that you (Mr. Suevie) have withdrawn a certain amount from your wallet.

If things happen in such a manner, how can you not say that Bitcoin is now becoming like the traditional bank where the bank workers are aware of every bit of transaction you carry out on your account and whom you have sent that money to?

Quickly, let's still remind ourselves that Satoshi Nakamoto said he created Bitcoin for the purpose of removing financial control from the hands of financial elites, like banks or any traditional financial system, and placing financial control in the hands of common men and women so that they can carry out their transactions without the involvement of any third party or even without having to reveal their identity to anyone.

So, if the government decides and tries to make Bitcoin centralized by creating some Bitcoin system and they (the government) become aware of your wallet, how much Bitcoin you hold, and that of all Bitcoiners, it is not going to really make much sense to me, bro.

Well, like you said, I should not speak of something as never going to be impossible, yea, but making Bitcoin a legal tender world wide, then I am thinking that that's what will even make the government properly look at how they can control the space, since they can't access Bitcoin to make it centralized, then they will force the users to obey the rules that they are going to lay out, and it might be a very uncomfortable law that will not allow us to freely enjoy the use of Bitcoin and our investment.

If you ask me this question over and over again, my answer would be that, whether the government makes Bitcoin a legal tender or whether it is globally accepted or not, Bitcoin will keep growing and waxing wide, with different user cases. Bitcoin doesn't need to first be approved by the government or accepted worldwide before its adoption will keep increasing.

Since its creation, Bitcoin has lived for more than 10 years, yet its adoption keeps growing. Meanwhile, it's not even globally approved by all the governments, so do you think that the government needs to approve it before the adoption will continue?

Lastly, in my first comment, I was not talking about any other cryptocurrency, if not Bitcoin.
I settle down to read every line of your comments and I do say that you are apparently right, however, I have in mind even before now that most government are investing in Bitcoin quietly and don't want others to know. (I can see you are a Nigerian, so let's talk about our government) more especially our Nigerian government, I have come in conclusion that the main reason why they didn't totally ban Bitcoin in our country is because they are also investing in it secretly, if they do ban Bitcoin totally they might find it difficult to invest, despite with the P2P transactions they will find it difficult to invest in Bitcoin, (I don't know how it will be difficult for them, but my instincts tell me so), they are scared to make Bitcoin so dem popular because they thought that Bitcoin will overcome the fiat currency and much people will not save their funds in the fiat banks anymore, just imagine if Bitcoin was legal in Nigeria during the cashless economy period, people wouldn't have suffered because of cash anymore rather they will just make sure that they convert there fiat currency into Bitcoin by clicking the buy button, and start making use of it, although most of the citizens wouldn't have the mind to risk their money, but a lot will do so because at that time, so many people will have no other options than to use Bitcoin.

As the world government can't control Bitcoin, it will be hard for the whole world to accept Bitcoin, but I have to say that Bitcoin doesn't need the whole world to accept it before it reaches where it will (hope you get my point?).
Of course I agree with your point of view. Bitcoin is not regulated by governments around the world which is why governments around the world cannot control it. If this Bitcoin was controlled by a government then surely Bitcoin would run in a regulated manner. I am a Bangladeshi Bitcoin is still banned in my country. There are several reasons why Bitcoin is banned in my country, one of the reasons being that most people in my country don't know about Bitcoin. Also my country is not very developed as an underdeveloped country it is better not to legalize Bitcoin in this country. However, two MP(Member of Parliament) in my country's parliament spoke about the legitimacy of Bitcoin, but now no MPs speak about the legitimacy of Bitcoin. However, even though Bitcoin is not legal in this country, various government employees and thousands of young people who work in Bitcoin are using Bitcoin freely. As Bitcoin is not legal in my country, there is no problem administratively, but sometimes due to money laundering, some young people are brought under administrative control. Moreover, even though Bitcoin is not legal in my country, we are using it safely.
hero member
Activity: 1792
Merit: 534
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
~snip
I settle down to read every line of your comments and I do say that you are apparently right, however, I have in mind even before now that most government are investing in Bitcoin quietly and don't want others to know. (I can see you are a Nigerian, so let's talk about our government) more especially our Nigerian government, I have come in conclusion that the main reason why they didn't totally ban Bitcoin in our country is because they are also investing in it secretly, if they do ban Bitcoin totally they might find it difficult to invest, despite with the P2P transactions they will find it difficult to invest in Bitcoin, (I don't know how it will be difficult for them, but my instincts tell me so), they are scared to make Bitcoin so dem popular because they thought that Bitcoin will overcome the fiat currency and much people will not save their funds in the fiat banks anymore, just imagine if Bitcoin was legal in Nigeria during the cashless economy period, people wouldn't have suffered because of cash anymore rather they will just make sure that they convert there fiat currency into Bitcoin by clicking the buy button, and start making use of it, although most of the citizens wouldn't have the mind to risk their money, but a lot will do so because at that time, so many people will have no other options than to use Bitcoin.

As the world government can't control Bitcoin, it will be hard for the whole world to accept Bitcoin, but I have to say that Bitcoin doesn't need the whole world to accept it before it reaches where it will (hope you get my point?).

I agree with your thoughts, and not only governments are quietly investing in bitcoin, but people who talk bad about bitcoin like Warren Buffett or Jim Cramer, always say that bitcoin is trash and it will disappear soon as well is quietly investing in bitcoin. I also recently found interesting news about Warren Buffett. Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway bought a stock and asked the SEC to let them keep the name of the stock private. Even though everything is still being kept secret, chances are I'm guessing it has something to do with bitcoin and cryptocurrency, otherwise there's no reason they would ask to keep it a secret.

We just need to understand one simple thing: the majority of poor people always have the mindset of helping each other overcome difficulties. But for rich people, they never want to share their rich cake with anyone. They don't want others to become rich like them, so never believe what they say but look at what they do. Their goal is to increase wealth so they will be willing to say anything to keep people away from wealth.


https://twitter.com/unusual_whales/status/1724769466821885976
sr. member
Activity: 882
Merit: 326
Let me also make additional comments. @Dr.Bitcoin_Strange has clearly stated in detail that even though Bitcoin is accepted in all countries of the world or not, it cannot shift the role of banks, banks will not die because we clearly know that banks control fiat currency, and I don't think governments and even countries will be as stupid as This makes Bitcoin the country's fixed currency, they will continue to use fiat currencies such as USD, Yuan, Yen, Rubber, Rupiah and so on.
I totally agree with this. I want to say that Bitcoin never violates the backing system. Since banks control fiat money, Since fiat money will always exist, so banking system will also exist. We can not say Bitcoin will be the central currency of any particular country because Bitcoin is volatile and its value is always changing. Moreover, since it has no centralization. But we can accept it as a means of investment or payment. It is enough if we use the benefits that we get through it properly. I think it is not a big deal whether a country's government accepts it or not. What is important is the benefits that people can get from it. In the meantime, the governments of various countries have not officially accepted Bitcoin, but they are accepting Bitcoin personally. This is where Bitcoin has great strength.
Bitcoin as a commodity, as an alternative payment, as a safe haven asset which is likened to gold but in digital form alone is Bitcoin's great strength to survive and exist. From here we know that Bitcoin's actions are at that limit and as a form of innovation for decentralization lovers, of course they also use and are very dependent on centralized systems (here fiat money and banks). Bitcoin appears to be a balance to the centralized system, Yin and Yang 😉
full member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 214
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
what you estimate might not happen considering that the government and banking institutions have long worked together to make banks and fiat remain popular, and weaken cryptocurrency.


the whole point of bitcoin is that it can be used without any third party bitcoin goes against the very purpose of banks and the government doesn’t like this, through btc the government won’t have as much control and won’t get to see everything in regards of their people’s financial situation

Quote

moreover, not everyone understands or wants to adopt crypto as their payment and this makes it more difficult to be able to penetrate the wider community.


think about the older generations who might not be as enthusiastic as us when it comes to technology what more if we combine technology and something so common as money?
member
Activity: 388
Merit: 30
Reward: 10M Sheen (Approx. 5000 BNB) Bounty
It is practically impossible to sweep away the fiat, the only thing is that it will depreciate in usage. As far fiat is concerned, it is still main means of transaction. Talking about global domination of bitcoins is a nightmare that may not happen in this generation even if there are news of it everywhere. Don't forget that as some people believe on bitcoin, others don't want to here about it. A lot of person are stereotype while others study the positive and negative effect of it to reach their own decision.  To be more realistic, how do you pay for product less than a dollar everytime you want to buy such things , especially children. Bitcoins dominance in today's world will not be base on usage as means of payment but mostly as means of investment and store of wealth and value when it is no longer as volatile as it is now.
member
Activity: 168
Merit: 77
There are still less educated people who cannot withdraw their money through bank ATM card although it is a very convenient method but still they face difficulties in transferring or withdrawing money online.

You know what CONVENIENCE is? Having to go to a mall or a superstore and after getting what you need, you take out your phone scan a QR Code and just like Zap, your transaction is successful. What could be more convenient than that. The normal banking system has a lot of glitches that can really cause you lots of inconvenience either as an educated or an uneducated person, but globally legalizing Bitcoin would for sure fix those glitches. Due to the centralized nature of our regular banking system, trust that the government and the financial agencies will always enforce laws and easily manipulate the banking system to suit Their interest and always fall in their favor, but the presence of Bitcoin would for sure solve those glitches due to its decentralized nature. Why do you think the government and so called law makers are strictly against Bitcoin and are fighting tirelessly to give Bitcoin a bad image just so Bitcoin wouldn't be legalized.

On 26 January 2022, BBC reported that Criminals laundered $8.6bn (£6.4bn) of cryptocurrency in 2021, up by 30% from the previous year, said it was a report by blockchain data company Chainalysis, amongst other several reports. All for what? Just to give Bitcoin a bad name. So my question is, before the introduction of Bitcoin as a means of moving money around, has their not been several other reports of money laundering via fiat? So why make it a big deal or make it look like it's a disadvantage or a glitch in Bitcoin when long before Bitcoin was introduced we've had several reports. I think it's just preposterous and this whole parade about Bitcoin being evil is just because the fast rising of Bitcoin poses a great threat to them and is gradually making them loose total control of the economy.


I settle down to read every line of your comments and I do say that you are apparently right, however, I have in mind even before now that most government are investing in Bitcoin quietly and don't want others to know.

There's no doubt that the Nigerian government are secretly investing in Bitcoin and uses Bitcoin as a means of moving money secretly, how then do you think the so called politicians move all the millions they loot. All the so called shitty crusade of making Bitcoin illegal are just mere formality, take for instance In June 2021 when Twitter was banned in Nigeria, some government officials were still reportedly seen making appearances on Twitter. LoL, the same lawmakers are the same people who break the laws.  in their dark circle, they all know the importance of Bitcoin, don't be surprised if they're the same persons who abuse the use of Bitcoin.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 292
20BET - Premium Casino & Sportsbook

All your aforementioned thoughts cannot be ignored but we can’t take all of them into account if eventually bitcoin will be used as the only currency for transactions. If the currency eventually becomes accepted globally, a lot of things will be put in place to make it simple to use and accessible to even the less educated. I have come to realise for every new innovation, it’ll take time for people to adopt to the change and when it becomes the only option to use, it becomes more faster for them to comprehend and explore its use.

I don't think Bitcoin will be the only currency used for transactions. Even if Bitcoin is accepted globally, there will still be alternative currencies. There are still less educated people who cannot withdraw their money through bank ATM card although it is a very convenient method but still they face difficulties in transferring or withdrawing money online.

Therefore, less educated people will face a lot of difficulties in Bitcoin transactions as one wrong transaction can damage their capital. The most important point is that you have no margin for error in making a wrong bitcoin transaction and you cannot get your bitcoins back. If Bitcoin becomes the only transaction option then educated people will not have any problem but what will the less educated people do?.I don't think it will be so easy for such people to understand the use and transaction of Bitcoin
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 366
I still want a world with only bitcoin without traditional currencies, but you are right. We cannot be that selfish because not everyone can afford to use cryptocurrency like us, especially people like our parents and grandparents.
You got that right. We will be gone one day and the next generation will keep on living in this world. The same goes with traditional currency and cryptocurrency. If we let both of them coexist, one day one will replace other. Old one will be gone, and the new one will take its place. That's how the whole world works. New things will replace the older ones.

We cannot just get rid of our previous generation and let everyone from this generation live. That is insane. We exist together unless our time will come and we will perish too. Having multiple options gives people the comfort to choose from any of them. People should be able to use whatever they are comfortable with. Not everyone is blessed with knowledge of everything. And the world with only Bitcoin may one day come for sure. But it's a long road.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 199
~

I might be wrong, and I don't know much about advanced technology, crypto, or bitcoin yet, so please don't take my questions negatively.
 In fact, all these questions have been created from the thoughts that I have presented here.

All your aforementioned thoughts cannot be ignored but we can’t take all of them into account if eventually bitcoin will be used as the only currency for transactions. If the currency eventually becomes accepted globally, a lot of things will be put in place to make it simple to use and accessible to even the less educated. I have come to realise for every new innovation, it’ll take time for people to adopt to the change and when it becomes the only option to use, it becomes more faster for them to comprehend and explore its use.
hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 513
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Let me also make additional comments. @Dr.Bitcoin_Strange has clearly stated in detail that even though Bitcoin is accepted in all countries of the world or not, it cannot shift the role of banks, banks will not die because we clearly know that banks control fiat currency, and I don't think governments and even countries will be as stupid as This makes Bitcoin the country's fixed currency, they will continue to use fiat currencies such as USD, Yuan, Yen, Rubber, Rupiah and so on.
I totally agree with this. I want to say that Bitcoin never violates the backing system. Since banks control fiat money, Since fiat money will always exist, so banking system will also exist. We can not say Bitcoin will be the central currency of any particular country because Bitcoin is volatile and its value is always changing. Moreover, since it has no centralization. But we can accept it as a means of investment or payment. It is enough if we use the benefits that we get through it properly. I think it is not a big deal whether a country's government accepts it or not. What is important is the benefits that people can get from it. In the meantime, the governments of various countries have not officially accepted Bitcoin, but they are accepting Bitcoin personally. This is where Bitcoin has great strength.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 337
.

Secondly, @OP, even if what you said is possible, those who lack knowledge of Bitcoin, blockchain technology, and other cryptocurrency will definitely learn about the technology and its user case. The use of bitcoin or cryptocurrency is not very sophisticated. Even bank workers studied at the university for some years and archived their degrees; that's also how people will learn about whatever they need to know about blockchain technology. If necessary.
Fuck crypto, I think Bitcoin is what is being referred to here and although we can't deny the fact that there is a possibility of Bitcoin becoming globally accepted of which is just a small percent of you ask me but I believe we can't write out anything in the world of possiblity as I believe no one would have taught that Bitcoin would get this massive adoption and attention prior to the first time it was created.

I believe as Bitcoin continues to grow more person or government would have no option than to join the queue on the diversification of its use as the way El Salvador have done although it's still in testing phase but I believe this sends a statement that Bitcoin use and government is actually possible even if they don't accept to the phase of making it a legal tender, learning about it more to properly know the areas which they can benefit won't be a bad idea and this has also started with my nation that first posed a restriction on the use of Bitcoin, now that decision has been reviewed back and plans to start learning more on Blockchain technology has put in place by the government so as they can know the area of which they can all benefit mutually from Bitcoin tech. That's certainly a growing and big step up in terms of Bitcoin and it's relation also with government if you ask me .

@Mr. Suevie, Don't get me quite off. I always used to say to myself that despite the fact that the governments of most countries are against Bitcoin and don't want it to be widely adopted by the citizens, that doesn't actually mean that some of those government officials are not investing in Bitcoin secretly. Of course, some of the government appointees, in one way or another, might be into Bitcoin secretly, but they don't want to make any effort to make Bitcoin a legal tender.

Bitcoin is a decentralized asset, and it was never created to become centralized. Currently, we know how many centralized exchanges out there and can't be compared to the decentralized exchange, and many new investors in Bitcoin are becoming more familiar with and feeling very secure with most of these centralized exchanges. Normally, you know that all those exchanges were given licenses of operation by the same government. So, don't you think that if the government decides to begin ceasing people's Bitcoin assets, they can possibly force those centralized exchanges to give them KYC details of customers  and the amount of Bitcoin they have purchased?

If such a situation begins to take place, and the government can begin to watch and monitor every user's Bitcoin wallet and the amount of transaction that is going on in it, then Bitcoin transactions will not really be that secure in the sense that if you make a withdrawal of any amount, the government will quickly know that you (Mr. Suevie) have withdrawn a certain amount from your wallet.

If things happen in such a manner, how can you not say that Bitcoin is now becoming like the traditional bank where the bank workers are aware of every bit of transaction you carry out on your account and whom you have sent that money to?

Quickly, let's still remind ourselves that Satoshi Nakamoto said he created Bitcoin for the purpose of removing financial control from the hands of financial elites, like banks or any traditional financial system, and placing financial control in the hands of common men and women so that they can carry out their transactions without the involvement of any third party or even without having to reveal their identity to anyone.

So, if the government decides and tries to make Bitcoin centralized by creating some Bitcoin system and they (the government) become aware of your wallet, how much Bitcoin you hold, and that of all Bitcoiners, it is not going to really make much sense to me, bro.

Well, like you said, I should not speak of something as never going to be impossible, yea, but making Bitcoin a legal tender world wide, then I am thinking that that's what will even make the government properly look at how they can control the space, since they can't access Bitcoin to make it centralized, then they will force the users to obey the rules that they are going to lay out, and it might be a very uncomfortable law that will not allow us to freely enjoy the use of Bitcoin and our investment.

If you ask me this question over and over again, my answer would be that, whether the government makes Bitcoin a legal tender or whether it is globally accepted or not, Bitcoin will keep growing and waxing wide, with different user cases. Bitcoin doesn't need to first be approved by the government or accepted worldwide before its adoption will keep increasing.

Since its creation, Bitcoin has lived for more than 10 years, yet its adoption keeps growing. Meanwhile, it's not even globally approved by all the governments, so do you think that the government needs to approve it before the adoption will continue?

Lastly, in my first comment, I was not talking about any other cryptocurrency, if not Bitcoin.
I settle down to read every line of your comments and I do say that you are apparently right, however, I have in mind even before now that most government are investing in Bitcoin quietly and don't want others to know. (I can see you are a Nigerian, so let's talk about our government) more especially our Nigerian government, I have come in conclusion that the main reason why they didn't totally ban Bitcoin in our country is because they are also investing in it secretly, if they do ban Bitcoin totally they might find it difficult to invest, despite with the P2P transactions they will find it difficult to invest in Bitcoin, (I don't know how it will be difficult for them, but my instincts tell me so), they are scared to make Bitcoin so dem popular because they thought that Bitcoin will overcome the fiat currency and much people will not save their funds in the fiat banks anymore, just imagine if Bitcoin was legal in Nigeria during the cashless economy period, people wouldn't have suffered because of cash anymore rather they will just make sure that they convert there fiat currency into Bitcoin by clicking the buy button, and start making use of it, although most of the citizens wouldn't have the mind to risk their money, but a lot will do so because at that time, so many people will have no other options than to use Bitcoin.

As the world government can't control Bitcoin, it will be hard for the whole world to accept Bitcoin, but I have to say that Bitcoin doesn't need the whole world to accept it before it reaches where it will (hope you get my point?).
sr. member
Activity: 882
Merit: 326
.

Secondly, @OP, even if what you said is possible, those who lack knowledge of Bitcoin, blockchain technology, and other cryptocurrency will definitely learn about the technology and its user case. The use of bitcoin or cryptocurrency is not very sophisticated. Even bank workers studied at the university for some years and archived their degrees; that's also how people will learn about whatever they need to know about blockchain technology. If necessary.
Fuck crypto, I think Bitcoin is what is being referred to here and although we can't deny the fact that there is a possibility of Bitcoin becoming globally accepted of which is just a small percent of you ask me but I believe we can't write out anything in the world of possiblity as I believe no one would have taught that Bitcoin would get this massive adoption and attention prior to the first time it was created.

I believe as Bitcoin continues to grow more person or government would have no option than to join the queue on the diversification of its use as the way El Salvador have done although it's still in testing phase but I believe this sends a statement that Bitcoin use and government is actually possible even if they don't accept to the phase of making it a legal tender, learning about it more to properly know the areas which they can benefit won't be a bad idea and this has also started with my nation that first posed a restriction on the use of Bitcoin, now that decision has been reviewed back and plans to start learning more on Blockchain technology has put in place by the government so as they can know the area of which they can all benefit mutually from Bitcoin tech. That's certainly a growing and big step up in terms of Bitcoin and it's relation also with government if you ask me .

~snip~

Let me also make additional comments. @Dr.Bitcoin_Strange has clearly stated in detail that even though Bitcoin is accepted in all countries of the world or not, it cannot shift the role of banks, banks will not die because we clearly know that banks control fiat currency, and I don't think governments and even countries will be as stupid as This makes Bitcoin the country's fixed currency, they will continue to use fiat currencies such as USD, Yuan, Yen, Rubber, Rupiah and so on. The reason is clear and has been explained by @Dr.Bitcoin_Strange previously, namely centralization. The realms of centralization and decentralization are very different and opposite, this certainly cannot be combined and used by the state.

Bitcoin will continue to develop and will have its own market focus, for example other alternative methods of payment or money transfer that are parallel to credit cards, master cards, wire transfers and so on, Bitcoin's development is only limited to that according to my observations.

If the problem is that there will be unemployment as discussed by the OP, industrial robots can also cause a lot of unemployment, but in fact they still require human power to supervise and run the robotic machines.
We need to remember, every technological development will definitely provide convenience, not add to problems. State officials must have thought about it and looked for other alternatives to maintain innovation.
sr. member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 334
Your worry is not far fetch but it is still unlikely to happen right now because by the time those stuff happen, it is likely that there is a lot of people that already knows about bitcoin or even cryptocurrency. When there is more people that has an adequate knowledge on bitcoin or cryptocurrency then the more the adoption grows and when the adoption grows more then by that time we will probably see banks being decimated and becoming obsolete but the people are not that heavily affected because as I have said, the adoption is already widespread.
full member
Activity: 868
Merit: 202
what you estimate might not happen considering that the government and banking institutions have long worked together to make banks and fiat remain popular, and weaken cryptocurrency. moreover, not everyone understands or wants to adopt crypto as their payment and this makes it more difficult to be able to penetrate the wider community.
Pages:
Jump to: