Topic: What coin will replace DRK/DASH ? - page 2. (Read 4007 times)

You people are so far behind on new tech it's hilarious.

check SDC out this article explains it well https://www.deepdotweb.com/2015/01/28/shadowcash-zero-knowledge-anonymity/ also this one http://digitalmoneytimes.com/crypto-news/shadowcash-introduces-shadowsend-v2-featuring-ring-signatures-zero-knowledge-anonymity-lots-more/ and this one http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-race-for-the-first-decentralised-silk-road-is-on
and we have just starting testing HD wallet and some other exciting things http://shadowtalk.org/topic/437/v1-3-testnet

The dev team of BBR served the task of solving technical problems, and it has been never failed doing that. I think that is enough.

The full intact blockchain with all ring signature is provided. Check the website, there is a link to it.

Haven't heard of Monero yet?

In my testing of all the coins based on CryptoNote, DigitalNote (XDN) has been the most solid.  So this anno coin is very much in my long term portfolio.  If the devs can keep producing solid code and features, I could see this rising to the top of all anno coins.   

Bolded phrase doesn't mean what you think it I means.

1st party = sender
2nd party = recipient
3rd party = masternode


Bolded phrase is false.

I belive that Zerocash/coin will replace any existent anon coin if it comes out.

Dash takes the most popular / trusted anonimization usage from the real world today (BTC tumbler) and makes it integrated / faster / more convenient / trustless with no 3rd partys.  Then it's ahead-of-time tumbling so you don't have to wait to mix with other anonymous transactions like Cryptonote (which is also unproven in the actual market due to it's lack of practically any adoption/usage).

Second the tech to do this (masternodes) provides an incentivized second-tier of fullnodes that can then be used for a lot of new uses not possible with Bitcoin's single-tier voluntary service provider approach. Features like instant transactions (transactions locked in the MN tier without having to wait for the next block) and decentralized governance / funding for coin development and pruning/abbreviation to prevent bloat and likely lots of use cases not envisaged yet, all provided by tier of (currently 2800+) fully hosted / maintained servers operated by the coin users themselves.  

The high value today compared to most other alts is a reflection of the potential value the market sees for the Dash 2-tier technology that positions Dash to capitalize better on opportunities and demand coming out of the ongoing merging of crypto currencies into main stream applications and services as the whole space matures.  In other words, 2-tier architecture is a much more versatile and flexible approach that provides a lot of added value, and is unique to Dash so it has the first-mover advantage.  This coupled with the track record of consistently delivering working features as planned with a very professional and busy dev team and the large community / ecosystem forming around it.  And has some of the most involved ongoing development of any coin e.g. https://dashtalk.org/forums/testing.53/ which is prerequisite to providing confidence it can succeed in delivering a value-add over Bitcoin from a technological perspective.

More details on the anonimization features from the main dev: https://soundcloud.com/mindtomatter/ltb-e196-distortions-towards-privacy-or-many-hands-makes-light-work

I admit BBR has some nice features. However ignoring the community size and level of developer interest (which I think is very important) XMR may have another advantage.

Could it not be argued that not pruning is safer from a security standpoint (XMR does not prune)?

Not all anon cryptonote are better than Bitcoin. All protocols either bitcoin protocol or cryptonote protocols are safe (in term we never loose coin, because blockchain is protected by network) the only advantage of cryptonote over bitcoin is anon. But if you dont mind doing comparison again, BBR(stand for Boolberry) has enhanced cryptonote by inventing blockchain reduction(by pruning ring signature), fast pow wild keccak with scratchpad, wallet address aliasing, network alerts, nice gui wallet. Which result very fast synchonization with network, smooth transactions not to mention anonimity.

The only cons of cryptonote (not BBR) is blockchain size,  just try to resync XMR, it will take days, while Boolberry only needs few hours/minutes. Good practice of crypto is users should backup the blockchain regularly. You might notice recent BTC blockchain problems, it will happen again and again, syncing with network is really pain and wasting time unless blockchain backed up regularly, but also huge blockchain is difficult to be backed up regularly (daily backup for at least 10 days record).

I have never heard a simple description of why DRK DASH is worth a shit.

XMR has always been expensive (expensive mistake for many in retrospect) but has normalized at current prices.

Nothing based on Bitcoin is anonymous, as long as packets are sent as plain text and peers listen on pre-defined port numbers there is no anonymity.

This was a very impressive coin from the beginning. With the very slow emission curve it is the perfect coin to start mining now. Early adopters were not rewarded with the lion share of all coins. Of the Cryptonote coins with an official GUI (XDN, BCN and BBR) please look carefully at the emission schedules and decide which one looks the most equitable considering the coin features that existed at the time most coins were being distributed

I think Boolberry has great potential to displace DASH based on its superior technology and fair distribution

In the real world, if a business changes its name a couple of times, people wonder about that,
and the business would likely lose money from doing that,
but in the fantasy world of crypto, a coin changes its name twice and who notices and who cares?

Well Stellar just replaced it at cmc as number 4 and the jokeDogecoin has more volume.
By the look of things it is a game of nerves at the moment .   Does Paycoin rings a bell?

Please explain why you believe so 

^
This.

As long as things are transparent, I think there will be no issues. Problem is that cryptocurrencies must be developed to be adopted more widely, rather than focus on that notorious anonymity for which so many people are eager about. If we look on cryptocurrencies as money, then you can't just think you can do whatever you want without expecting some consequences.

I'm guessing that you are talking about if governments defined cryptocurrencies as printing money that they could declare them illegal?
Which AFAIK has already been determined not to be the case in the US as was discussed much in the early goings of Bitcoin legislation, nor would this exclude Bitcoin if the regulators decided to view the existing laws differently.

Now as the specific statement that i think you are making about a coin being anonymous and therefore used for suspicious activities and that having some impact on there legality or regulation, again I'm guessing at your meaning. I would say that it also falls on Bitcoin if you believe it can be made anonymous enough. Now, if you are saying Bitcoin isn't that anonymous, and more anonymous coins can be singled out for regulation or legality, I'd content that as long as they give you the ability to show authorities your transaction history for legal or tax purposes, then you would be keeping with the law and no distinction could be made between a coin with a transparent ledger than one with a opaque ledger. Monero does this with a viewkey as I'm sure any of the cryptonight coins could also.

Did i interpret your meaning clearly?

What is so good about SDC. I see a lot of people hyping it but there is very little or no explanation as to why it is superior.
Why is it so good?

Delusions, use third party mixers?

People were happy with banks too, satoshi opened their eyes. Bitcoin is just a small carrier to big things. True financial privacy and ownership is coming, buckle up