What Comes First: Block Size or Halving? - page 3.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: n2004al on January 28, 2016, 05:23:37 AM

I din't think that the problem of block size will be resolved so easy. The main core developer (Gavin Andresen) it is supporter of "another" bitcoin. With him even another charismatic developer as Jeff Garzik. The others remaining at bitcoincore are unknown people and with less contributes in the actual bitcoin (as it is actually). I don't see any point in which these two groups can be together.

This is just nonsense. Gavin is far from being 'main core' developer. The group that is working on Bitcoin Core is much bigger and more skilled than the one working for Bitcoin Classic.

Quote from: pooya87 on January 28, 2016, 01:05:12 AM

with what i see from bitcoin developers until now, i say block size debate is not going to be solved this easily and it will take a very long time. because of that i vote block halving to be first.

Even if they make a decision right now, rushing to deploy it is dangerous. Hard forks need time.

n2004al

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Enjorlas on January 23, 2016, 08:06:30 PM

What are your opinions on this? Will the block size problem be resolved or will the halving happen first?

I din't think that the problem of block size will be resolved so easy. The main core developer (Gavin Andresen) it is supporter of "another" bitcoin. With him even another charismatic developer as Jeff Garzik. The others remaining at bitcoincore are unknown people and with less contributes in the actual bitcoin (as it is actually). I don't see any point in which these two groups can be together. Every each of those has already its bitcoin and is working for it. So, according to me, not only before halving but even to much time after halving there it will not be a solution of this problem. Being not a technician (devs or programmer) cannot be able to tell if this division (if can be successful both variants of bitcoin) could affect the halving but normally not. It would be the the halving of the bitcoin of today and not of the bitcoin classic. Anyhow if both are bitcoin and have the same code and development (except the block size) can (or must) be even the halving of the other one. Anyhow this is not something that is much important for this thread so have no meaning to be analyzed more.

pooya87

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 10611

with what i see from bitcoin developers until now, i say block size debate is not going to be solved this easily and it will take a very long time. because of that i vote block halving to be first.

Undermood

legendary

Activity: 950

Merit: 1000

Block size increase will happen after the halving. Because the the debate is ongoing for many months and there is no quick solution at the moment. But halving is planned on the timetable.

Bitcoinpro

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1000

the halving sounds like a Stephen King novel

Cheesy

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

the roadmap is telling me that the segwit thign will be implemented in april, so i say the block size, unless i'm missing something

if you mean the normal increase to 2mb, this is not going to happen in any case already

DimensionZ

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 251

Shit, did I leave the stove on?

I think we will get first the halving and then the block size adjustment will follow. I hope these events will cause the price to increase

aso118

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1012

★Nitrogensports.eu★

We need "consensus" for the block size debate to be resolved. I wouldn't put my money on that happening any time soon.
So I would go for halving.

maokoto

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

✪ NEXCHANGE | BTC, LTC, ETH & DOGE ✪

Halving first, then blocksize solution. At this point it seems to be that a solution for blocksize will not be found until it really becomes a problem, sadly. Hope that is the other way around.

saturn643

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

The halving will probably come first, but that doesn't mean we won't have a capacity increase. SegWit is supposed to come out in April, which is two months before the halving. SegWit will bring with it some capacity increase.

Hazir

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1005

★Nitrogensports.eu★

Of course halving will hit us first. Seeing how majority of miners (Chinese side) already decided to stick with standard bitcoin core and don't upgrade anything I see no way how we can see bigger blocks anytime soon.

gentlemand

legendary

Activity: 2604

Merit: 3056

Welt Am Draht

An interesting question. The halving is one thing that does seem to be agreed upon so that's likely to be first. I'd be happier and feel more positive if it was vice versa but that's life.

mr angry

sr. member

Activity: 298

Merit: 253

I think the halving will happen before the block size thing gets resolved. The block size arguments have dragged on for month after month, and there are so many stake holders involved that reaching consensus could drag on for another year. It could be quickly resolved if somebody devises a coding solution that's so brilliant everyone immediately accepts it, but I don't think anyone will.

MicroGuy

legendary

Activity: 2506

Merit: 1030

Twitter @realmicroguy

Quote from: Enjorlas on January 23, 2016, 08:06:30 PM

What are your opinions on this? Will the block size problem be resolved or will the halving happen first?

If history is any indication, then the halving will first commence.

Enjorlas

hero member

Activity: 788

Merit: 1000

What are your opinions on this? Will the block size problem be resolved or will the halving happen first?

Topic: What Comes First: Block Size or Halving? - page 3. (Read 2381 times)