Also, by being under that state of euphoria of being right, you have also missed/ignored the utilities that I have mentioned.
Oh well, that's your opinion. I have no say over that anyway, I appreciate the enthusiasm to converse though.
I can re-read your statement four hundred times and I can read your response nine hundred it won't change a thing, the fact that you failed to mention one coin or token that has an actual utility and that can't be replaced by Bitcoin, and since you're saying I'm missing the "utilities" you have mentioned what are those? Common, don't be shy, one utility other than printing token after tokens with no utility at all.
You were triggered because I picked 5 random coins and those weren't the ones with utility, good, pick 10 out of the first 100 by your choice and tell me the utility behind it that no other coin has.
If you want to contradict my statement and prove me wrong come with the proof.
"I can re-read your statement four hundred times and I can read your response nine hundred -
and still miss it."
You can think of my reasons for responding any way you want, that's your right.
What I wanted to do and still trying to do right now though while typing this response is explain a bit better to make it easier for you to understand since you seem to have gravely misinterpreted my response to OP.
Okay, let me start making it a bit more easier for you to understand. I was talking about different perspectives. And with those varying perspectives people have varying needs or wants and these demand for wants and needs are what gives birth to several projects with different utility or improving the utility of an existing one. These are the real utilities that I have been referring to in my post that you first responded to:
Ease of access for something, fun, satisfying or whatever plus the profitability potential. And I'd be damned if none of these utilities are in the coins that you hold or trade on a daily basis(if you are into leveraged trading or flipping).
While I was a bit lazy to mention more utilities I know of, I thought the word "whatever" in that sentence was pretty easy to understand already; that there are more utilities which weren't mentioned.
But yes, be it decentralization, p2e, defi, dao "etc.," or even shitcoins. They are continuously created or improved because there is demand, a need for improvement or a need to satisfy risk taker's needs for fun or thrill on their get rich quick hopium. Are these things important? That
depends on the
perspective of an investor.
A good example for creating a token with somewhat a copied utility to add improvements or branching out more utilities are these four that are revolving on storage utility :
Siacoin(SIA) - which aims to solve the problem of expensive cloud storage.
Storj - which offers decentralized, end-to-end encrypted cloud storage having the goal of solving problems relating to data security issues.
MaidSafe - which aims to do more on its network than trade storage; it markets itself as a “crowdsourced internet,” on which not only data is stored but decentralized applications live.
Filecoin - which is a blockchain-based marketplace that allows its users to monetize their unused storage space by hosting files for a fee.
The varying stablecoins that currently exist or are still about to pop up can also be good examples but I am sure you already know about those.
Anyway, I hope this response finally made you understand the main point of my response to OP. If by any chance it still doesn't, then apologies but I won't be explaining any further than this.