Topic: What do I have to analyze in the team of an ico? (Read 319 times)
It shouldn't be about networks or number of followers but about professional experience and how relevant that is to making the startup successful and these aren't the only attributes to look for also evaluate the potential use cases, partnerships, marketing strategy, and uniqueness of innovation
Team members are people that are standing behind any ICO, in other words these are people in whom you are investing your money in. You should be sure that the pictures on the website fit the reality and that these people are existing.
At this point of crypto frauds. Check is the team is real is a priority.
Experience says a lot about the team you were trying to analyze. Check previous project and know how it goes. If you just rely on popularity, you might be deceive on the things that they can do and what they cannot. Always remember that popularity doesn't mean anything on crypto. Look at those scam ICO's that sold millions of dollars, they are popular yet they chose not to fulfill their promise.
In what networks do they have to be? 
How many followers as a minimum?
How many followers as a minimum?
First we must sure they are people not bot, find true information that you can use as proof. Second see their works, as long still same with their skill everything will be fine. Last thing try to contact and built communication with them, how good their respond and language. That's the simple way, never see their follower or social media out look.
The thinks that you have to analyzed in the team of ICO, are the things you must considered, when joining and investing in a certain ICO , you have to analyzed the the platform , the form of the road map on where this project go beyond , is this ICO project have resources and it might be needed by the pople ,and the industies
You can look for their experience what all members did before and if they can achieve to build up this project well. And after all the number of people is important. If they plan a huge project but have only a little team it will not be enough to succed and deliever a good project.
Knowing the legitimacy of the team members of a certain project is the most important thing to do before investing to it. You may not need to analyze as to what network they belong as long as their portfolio on linked in or either facebook is legit.Thats for my own opinion only. And make sure this people isn’t an impostor.
See the team, site, roadmap. A lot of information, moreover, now they have learned very skillfully to mask all these dishonest projects.
I am looking their past working experience usually through Linkedin and other sources to make shure
if they are capable to realize the project. Looking at advisers as well as they are playing an important role
in the project success.
if they are capable to realize the project. Looking at advisers as well as they are playing an important role
in the project success.
I don't want to be a racist but everytime I see this certain nationality who heads the team or if the majority of the team is this nationality, I usually don't go further.
the more networks, the better, it proves ICO is running seriously, moreover the team is active in each network and has a positive response to each response, and after all they have more than a thousand followers to see the activity of the network itself, skill problems, the team should have good intellectual ability regarding the project they are working on and there is no doubt in every response given to all investors
In analyzing the team of an ICO, you look out for the following;
1. Do they have the requisite skills and experience to execute the project.
2. Look out for their LinkedIn profiles and how active it is. If they have other companies or projects they claim to have worked on, check to confirm they're real projects out there and not some fictitious ones.
3. Do some background check by doing a Google search of their names, especially the executives to see if they've involved in a fraud in the past or associated with any scam project(s)
These are some of the basic things to look out for in a team, thought it might not be exhaustive
1. Do they have the requisite skills and experience to execute the project.
2. Look out for their LinkedIn profiles and how active it is. If they have other companies or projects they claim to have worked on, check to confirm they're real projects out there and not some fictitious ones.
3. Do some background check by doing a Google search of their names, especially the executives to see if they've involved in a fraud in the past or associated with any scam project(s)
These are some of the basic things to look out for in a team, thought it might not be exhaustive
In what networks do they have to be?
How many followers as a minimum?
I think you must look at their positions at the team whether their qualifications are enough to with stood at the position they are holding in the ICO management team. You must also review their previous projects/works, if they managed it well and if they make it a successful project. Number of followers now matters at all, the important is their leadership and work-experience to run a wholesome project/s. How many followers as a minimum?
They must have good experiences in industry that the project get involved, team must have experiences in blockchain technology, dapps development, cryptocurrency market. Directory members must have experiences in manager project, kept same position in the past in different companies.
The number of fans is just one way to check the ICO project, because it determines how much attention the project gets, and I think the more important is the real address of the project and its partners!
In what networks do they have to be?
How many followers as a minimum?
How many followers as a minimum?
When you are looking at the team, you need to look closely at their genuinety, how real are they ? are they real accounts
After confirming the account proof, you can then look into their work history, and success rate
Then you can look into the followers too, are they pump and dump team, or actually a product creation team ?
they can make any network they like, and followers are not the capacity that determines the network is quality or not, but a very good team will answer all ICO related questions and be active every day to follow the network, simple, they will pay close attention to every little detail that occurs in the network of investors
They should be in almost all social networks and have a large number of subscribers, but the main thing is not bots. But this still does not speak about the success of the ICO.
In what networks do they have to be?
How many followers as a minimum?
What is paramount is their history in crypto and experience so far in crypto.You can check their contribution to crypto sphere in general in the past and present,also check if they have been part of a project before and see how the project turn out to be. How many followers as a minimum?
Jump to: